Bethesda Handbook of Clinical Oncology, 2nd Edition

Head and Neck

1

Head and Neck Cancer

Barbara A. Conley*

Arlene A. Forastiere

David Gius

Carter VanWaes§

*Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

  • Head and Neck Surgery Branch, National Institute for Deafness and Other Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Tumors of the head and neck are the sixth most common malignancy in the United States, with a yearly incidence of 40,000 to 50,000 cases. Ninety percent of these cancers involve squamous cell histology. The most common sites are the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers, salivary gland malignancies, and various sarcomas, lymphomas, and melanoma are less common.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The worldwide incidence of head and neck squamous cancer is more than 500,000 cases per year, and in the United States, it comprises approximately 4% to 5% of all new cancers and 2% of all cancer deaths (11,000 per year) (1). Most patients are older than 50 years, and incidence increases with age; the male-to-female ratio is 2.5:1. The age-adjusted incidence is higher among black men, and, stage-for-stage, survival among African Americans is lower overall than in whites. Approximately 34% of oral and pharyngeal cancers present as localized disease, 46% present as locoregional (i.e., locally advanced or involving regional lymph nodes) disease, and 10% present as metastatic disease.

RISK FACTORS

Tobacco and alcohol use are major risk factors for developing cancer. Heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk twofold to sixfold, whereas smoking increases the risk fivefold to 25-fold, depending on gender, race, and the amount of smoking. Both factors together increase the risk 15-fold to 40-fold. Smokeless tobacco and snuff are associated with oral cavity cancers. Case–control studies show that the relative risk for developing erythroplasia cancer in tissues in contact with snuff powder (cheek and gum) is nearly 50-fold (2). In many parts of Asia and some parts of Africa, chewing betel with or without tobacco and slaked lime is associated with premalignant lesions and oral squamous cancers (3,4).

Alcohol and tobacco affect the entire respiratory mucosa, leading to multifocal mucosal abnormalities known as “field cancerization” (5). There is a 2% to 6% per year risk for a second head and neck, lung, or esophageal cancer in patients with a history of cancer in this area. Those who

P.4


continue to smoke have the highest risk. Second primary cancers represent a major risk factor for death among survivors of an initial squamous carcinoma of the head and neck (6,7,8).

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been detected in virtually all nonkeratinizing and undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancers but less consistently in squamous nasopharyngeal cancers (reviewed in 9). Correlation has been observed between the presence of papillomavirus and oral and oropharynx cancers (10,11,12).

Other risk factors include sun exposure (lip cancer); occupational exposure to nickel (nose and ethmoids), radium (antrum), mustard gas (sphenoid), chromium (sinuses and nose), leather (ethmoids and nasal cavity), and wood dust (ethmoids and nasal cavity); radiation exposure (thyroid and salivary gland cancer); EBV exposure (nasopharyngeal cancer); and, possibly, vitamin A deficiency and marijuana. Disorders of DNA repair (e.g., Fanconi anemia) as well as organ transplantation with immunosuppression are associated with increased risk of squamous head and neck cancer.

PREVENTION AND CHEMOPREVENTION

The most important recommendation for prevention of head and neck cancer is to avoid smoking and to limit alcohol intake. Premalignant lesions occurring in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx manifest as leukoplakia (a white patch that does not scrape off and that has no other obvious cause) or erythroplakia (friable reddish or specked lesions) (see Table 1.1.). The risk of leukoplakias without dysplasia progressing to cancer is about 4%. However, up to 40% of severe dysplasias or erythroplasias progress to cancer. Retinoids can reversibly improve premalignant histology. In a small randomized placebo-controlled trial in patients treated for a head and neck cancer, isotretinoin decreased the incidence of second primary tumors (13). A larger definitive randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with curatively treated stages I and II head and neck squamous cell carcinoma failed to find any benefit of 13-cis-retinoic acid in preventing

P.5


second primary cancers or in survival (14). Euroscan, a large European chemoprevention trial that randomized patients with stage I to stage III non–small cell lung cancer or head and neck squamous cancer to either vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) or N-acetylcysteine (a free radical scavenger), neither drug or both drugs, also failed to find preventive benefit (15).

TABLE 1.1. Premalignant Lesions

From McFarland M, Abaza NA, El-Mofty S. In: Damjanov I, Linder J, eds. Anderson's pathology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996, with permission.

Premalignant lesions

Leukoplakia

Erythroplakia

Dysplasia

Clinical features

White patch or plaque occurring in surface of mucous membrane that does not rub off, once other oral diseases are ruled out

Bright red velvety plaques that cannot be characterized clinically or pathologically as being due to any other condition

Can present as leukoplakia, erythroplakia, or without obvious macroscopic findings

Probability of progression to malignant lesions

4%

15%–30% of dysplastic Lesions

15%–30%

Histopathology

Hyperkeratosis associated with variable histologic findings; rarely contain dysplasia or carcinoma. (Invasive or in situ carcinoma found in only 6% of cases)

Mild to moderate dysplasia in 10% of patients; severe dysplasia, in situ or invasive carcinoma in 90% of cases

True histologic diagnosis: pleomorphic changes, increased number of nucleoli, prominent nucleoli

Presently, there is no effective chemoprevention for patients at risk for head and neck squamous cancer. Chemoprevention outside a clinical trial is not recommended and is potentially harmful. Two large randomized chemoprevention trials for lung cancer demonstrated a worse outcome for those patients randomized to Vitamin A and β-Carotene (CARET study) or to β-Carotene alone (ATBC study) (16,17,18,19).

ANATOMY

A simplified depiction of extracranial head and neck anatomy is presented in FIG. 1.1.

 

FIG. 1.1. Sagittal section of the upper aerodigestive tract. (Used with the permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, Illinois. The original source for this material is the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition (2002) published by Springer-Verlag, New York, http://www.springer-ny.com.)

The patterns of lymphatic drainage divide the neck into several levels (see FIG. 1.2). Level I comprises the submental or submandibular nodes; level II (upper jugular lymph nodes) extends from the skull base to the hyoid bone; level III (middle jugular lymph nodes) is the area between the hyoid bone and the lower border of the cricoid cartilage; level IV (lower jugular lymph nodes) is the area between the cricoid cartilage and the clavicle; level V is the posterior triangle; level VI is the anterior compartment from the hyoid bone to the suprasternal notch, bounded on each side by the medial carotid sheath; and level VII is the area of the superior mediastinum. Masses more than 3 cm in greatest dimension are generally groups of nodes or a single node, with the tumor extending into the soft tissues (20). Knowledge of the lymphatic

P.6


drainage of the neck assists the surgeon in planning the extent of neck resection and in locating a primary tumor when a palpable lymph node is the initial presentation.

 

FIG. 1.2. Diagram of the neck showing levels of lymph nodes. Level I, submandibular; level II, high jugular; level III, midjugular; levelIV, low jugular; level V, posterior jugular; level VI, tracheoesophageal; level VIII (superior mediastinal) is not shown. (Used with the permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, Illinois. The original source for this material is the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition (2002) published by Springer-Verlag, New York, http://www.springer-ny.com.)

STAGING SYSTEM

Staging is based on physical examination and imaging tests. The staging system put forth by the American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) (see Table 1.2) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) [tumor, node, metastasis (TNM)] is used. The AJCC classification (20) emphasizes resectability status by dividing advanced disease stages into stage IVA (resectable), stage IVB (unresectable), and stage IVC (distant metastatic disease).

TABLE 1.2. TNM Staging of Head and Neck Tumors

Parapharyngeal extension denotes posterolateral infiltration of tumor beyond the pharyngobasilar fascia.
Central compartment of soft tissues includes prelaryngeal strap muscles and subcutaneous fat.
Midline nodes are considered ipsilateral nodes.
Supraclavicular zone or fossa is relevant to the staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and is the triangular region originally described by Ho. It is defined by three points: (a) the superior margin of the sternal end of the clavicle, (b) the superior margin of the lateral end of the clavicle, (c) the point where the neck meets the shoulder. Note that this would include the caudal portions of levels IV and V. All cases with lymph nodes (whole or part) in the fossa are considered N3b.
Used with the permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, Illinois. The original source for this material is the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition (2002) published by Springer-Verlag, New York, http://www.springer-ny.com .

Definition of TNM

Primary tumor (T)

   TX

Primary tumor cannot be assessed

   T0

No evidence of primary tumor

   Tis

Carcinoma in situ

Nasopharynx

   T1

Tumor confined to the nasopharynx

   T2

Tumor extends to soft tissue

   T2a

Tumor extends to the oropharynx and/or nasal cavity without parapharyngeal extensiona

   T2b

Any tumor with parapharyngeal extensiona

   T3

Tumor involves bony structures and/or paranasal sinuses

   T4

Tumor with intracanial extension and/or involvement of cranial nerves, infratemporal fossa, hypopharynx, orbit, or masticator space

Oropharynx

   T1

Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

   T2

Tumor more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension

   T3

Tumor more than 4 cm in greatest dimension

   T4a

Tumor invades the larynx, deep/extrinsic muscle of tongue, medial pterygoid, hard palate, or mandible

   T4b

Tumor invades lateral pterygoid muscle, pterygoid plates, lateral nasopharynx, or skull base or encases carotid artery

Hypopharynx

   T1

Tumor limited to one subsite of hypopharynx and 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

   T2

Tumor invades more than one subsite of hypopharynx or an adjacent site, or measures more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest diameter without fixation of hemilarynx

   T3

Tumor more than 4 cm in greatest dimension or with fixation of hemilarynx

   T4a

Tumor invades thyroid/cricoid cartilage, hyoid bone, thyroid gland, esophagus, or central compartment soft tissueb

   T4b

Tumor invades prevertebral fascia, encases carotid artery, or involves mediastinal structures

Regional Lymph Nodes (N)

Nasopharynx

The distribution and the prognostic impact of regional lymph node spread from nasopharynx cancer, particularly of the undifferentiated type, are different from those of other head and neck mucosal cancers and justify the use of a different N classification scheme.

   NX

Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

   N0

No regional lymph node metastasis

   N1

Unilateral metastasis in lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossac

   N2

Bilateral metastasis in lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossac

   N3

Metastasis in a lymph node(s)c >6 cm and/or to supraclavicular fossa 
N3a Greater than 6 cm in dimension 
N3b Extension to the supraclavicular fossad

Oropharynx and Hypopharynx

   NX

Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

   N0

No regional lymph node metastasis

   N1

Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension

   N2

Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, more than 3 cm but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, or in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, or in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension.

   N2a

Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node more than 3 cm but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

   N2b

Metastasis in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

   N2c

Metastasis in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

   N3

Metastasis in a lymph node more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

Distant Metastasis (M)

   MX

Distant metastasis cannot be assessed

   M0

No distant metastasis

   M1

Distant metastasis

Stage Grouping: Nasopharynx

   Stage 0

Tis

N0

M0

   Stage I

T1

N0

M0

   Stage IIA

T2a

N0

M0

   Stage IIB

T1

N1

M0

T2

N1

M0

T2a

N1

M0

T2b

N0

M0

T2b

N1

M0

   Stage III

T1

N2

M0

T2a

N2

M0

T2b

N2

M0

T3

N0

M0

T3

N1

M0

T3

N2

M0

   Stage IVA

T4

N0

M0

T4

N1

M0

T4

N2

M0

   Stage IVB

Any T

N3

M0

   Stage IVC

Any T

Any N

M1

Stage Grouping: Oropharynx, Hypopharynx

   Stage 0

Tis

N0

M0

   Stage 1

T1

N0

M0

   Stage II

T2

N0

M0

   Stage III

T3

N0

M0

T1

N1

M0

T2

N1

M0

T3

N1

M0

   Stage IVA

T4a

N0

M0

T4a

N1

M0

T1

N2

M0

T2

N2

M0

T3

N2

M0

T4a

N2

M0

   Stage IVB

T4b

Any N

M0

Any T

N3

M0

   Stage IVC

Any T

Any N

M1

The T classification indicates the extent of the primary tumor. It differs for each site. For primary tumors of the oral cavity, hypopharynx, and oropharynx, lesions greater than 4 cm are classified as T3. Vocal cord paralysis with a larynx or hypopharynx primary indicates at least T3. Lesions with local invasion of adjacent structures indicate T4.

The N classification is uniform for all primary sites, except nasopharynx. For all primary sites except nasopharynx, any clinical lymph node involvement indicates at least stage III, and nodes larger than a single 3-cm ipsilateral node are classified as stage IV regardless of T stage.

The presence of distant metastasis (M1) indicates stage IVC disease. Mediastinal lymph node involvement is considered distant metastasis.

Tumor grade has not shown significant association with outcome and is not considered when staging head and neck cancers.

P.7

 

P.8

 

P.9

 

PRESENTATION

Signs and symptoms are usually secondary to mass effect and/or pain from primary tumor or involved lymph nodes and invasion of adjacent structures or nerves (see Table 1.3) Adult patients with any of these symptoms for more than 4 weeks should be referred to an otolaryngologist. Delay in diagnosis is common: either patient delay or repeated courses of antibiotics for otitis media or sore throat, for example. A lateralized firm cervical mass in an elderly smoker is highly suggestive of squamous cell carcinoma. For nasopharyngeal cancers, the most common presenting symptom is a neck mass, sometimes in the posterior triangle. In advanced lesions, cranial nerve abnormalities may be present.

TABLE 1.3. Common Presenting Signs and Symptoms of Head and Neck Cancer

Painless neck mass
Odynophagia
Dysphagia
Hoarseness
Hemoptysis
Trismus
Otalgia
Otitis media
Loose teeth
Ill-fitting dentures
Cranial nerve deficits
Nonhealing oral ulcers

With the exception of hypopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancers, distant metastases are uncommon at presentation. The most common sites of distant metastases are lung and bone; liver involvement is less common.

DIAGNOSIS

The history should include:

  1. tobacco exposure (pack-years, amount chewed, and duration of habit, current or former)
  2. alcohol exposure (number of drinks per day)
  3. other risk factors mentioned earlier
  4. cancer history of family
  5. signs and symptoms listed in Table 1.3
  6. thorough review of systems.

The physical examination should include:

  1. careful inspection of the scalp, ears, nose, and mouth;
  2. palpation of the neck and mouth, assessment of tongue mobility, determination of restrictions in the ability to open the mouth (trismus), and bimanual palpation of the base of the tongue and floor of the mouth;
  3. special attention should be given to the examination of cranial nerves.

Abnormalities are suggested by asymmetry in the physical examination. Referral for direct and indirect laryngoscopy should be strongly considered for symptoms of hoarseness or sore throat not cured by a single course of antibiotics.

Friability (easy bleeding), an indicator of an early malignant process and erythroplakia (Table 1.1), is frequently associated with severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ and the site should be biopsied. When neck mass is the first presentation, the primary site can be located and biopsied in approximately 80% of cases. If no primary site is obvious, tissue diagnosis

P.10


can be obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the node, with sensitivity and specificity approaching 99%. A nondiagnostic FNA does not rule out the presence of tumor.

Computerized tomography scan (CT scan) remains the primary imaging study for evaluation of metastatic adenopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may complement the CT scan. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are being used more frequently to detect tumors that are not obvious on other scans, but this technique is still under evaluation (21,22).

Laryngoscopy and nasopharyngoscopy should be performed. With occult primary tumors, directed biopsies of the nasopharynx, tonsil, base of tongue, and pyriform sinus should be performed (see FIG. 1.3). Bilateral tonsillectomy will sometimes reveal the source of an occult cancer.

 

FIG. 1.3. Evaluation of cervical adenopathy when a primary cancer of the head and neck is suspected.

Surgical biopsy of a neck mass is contraindicated if a squamous cell carcinoma is suspected. Studies show that open biopsy may worsen local control, increase the rate of distant metastases, and decrease overall survival rate, possibly by spreading the disease at the time of the biopsy. Finally, an open biopsy does not provide any information additional to that obtained from FNA, and laryngoscopy is still necessary for treatment planning.

P.11

 

WORK-UP AND STAGING EVALUATION

After the diagnosis of cancer is established, the patient should be clinically staged by physical examination and radiologic studies, usually by CT scan and/or MRI of the primary tumor, neck, and chest. CT scan better defines the cortical bone and is better than MRI for evaluating metastatic adenopathy. MRI has superior soft tissue contrast, does not involve radiation, and may be better than CT scan for primary tumor staging. PET scanning is still undergoing evaluation for sensitivity and specificity (21,22). A chest radiograph or chest CT scan is indicated for all patients because of the risk of a second malignancy. Additional studies vary according to the clinical stage, symptoms, and primary site.

PROGNOSIS

The most important determinant of prognosis is stage at diagnosis. The 5-year survival for stage I patients exceeds 80% but is less than 40% in stage III and IV disease. Most patients have locally advanced disease involving one or several lymph nodes on one or both sides of the neck. The presence of a palpable lymph node in the neck generally decreases the survival rate by 50% compared to the same T stage without node involvement.

Most relapses occur locoregionally. Distant metastases are more commonly seen later in the course of the disease, or as part of relapse after successful initial treatment, and predominantly involve lung, bone, and liver. The lifetime risk of developing a new cancer for a patient with head and neck cancer is 20% to 40% (6,8). After 3 years, development of a new cancer represents the greatest survival risk (seeTables 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6).

TABLE 1.4. Head and Neck Cancer: Oral Cavity

Site

Epidemiology

Natural history and common presenting symptoms

Nodal involvement

Prognosis (5-yr survival)

M:F, male-to-female ratio.

Lip

Risk factors are sun exposure and tobacco; 3,600 new cases a year; 10 to 40 times more common in white men than in black men or women (black or white)

Exophytic mass or ulcerative lesion; more common in lower lip (92%); slow-growing tumors; pain and bleeding

5%–10%

T1, 90%

Midline tumors spread bilaterally

T2, 84%

Level I more common (submandibular and submental); upper lip lesions metastasize earlier: Level I and also preauricular

With Lymph node involvement, 50%

Alveolar ridge and retromolar trigone

10% of all oral cancers; M:F, 4:1

Exophytic mass or infiltrating tumor, may invade bone; bleeding, pain exacerbated by chewing, loose teeth, and ill-fitting dentures

30% (70% if T4)

T1, 85%

Levels I and II more common

T2, 80%

T3, 60%

T4, 20%

Floor of mouth

10%–15% of oral cancers, (occurrence 0.6/100,000);

Painful infiltrative lesions, may invade bone, muscles of floor of mouth and tongue

T1, 12%; T2, 30%; T3, 47%; and T4, 53%

By stage:

M:F, 3:1; median age, 60 yr

Levels I and II more common

I, 85%–90%

II, 80%

III, 66%

IV, 32%

Tongue (anterior two thirds)

6,200 new cases/yr; median age, 60 yr; M:F, 3:1

Exophytic or infiltrative pain, occasional difficulty in speech and deglutition

Greatest propensity for lymph node metastasis of oral cavity sites; bilateral involvement, 25%; level II more common, followed by I, III, and IV

Early stage node negative, 74%

Advanced stage, 30%

Hard palate

0.4 cases/100,000 (5% of oral cavity); M:F, 8:1; 50% cases squamous, 50% salivary glands

Deeply infiltrating or superficially spreading pain

Less frequently: 6%–29%

By stage:

I, 75%

II, 46%

III, 36%

IV, 11%

Buccal mucosa

8% of oral cavity cancers in United States; Women > men

Exophytic more often, silent presentation; pain, bleeding, difficulty in chewing

10% at diagnosis
Levels I and II more common

18%–77% all Stages

TABLE 1.5. Head and Neck Cancer: Oropharynx and Larynx

Site

Epidemiology

Natural history and common presenting symptoms

Nodal involvement

Prognosis (5-yr survival)

 

M:F, male-to-female ratio.

 

Base of tongue

4,000 new cases annually in the United States; M:F ratio, 3 to 5:1.

Advanced at presentation (silent location, aggressive behavior);

All stages: 70% (T1) to 80% (T4)

By stage:

 

Pain, dysphagia, weight loss, and otalgia(from cranial nerve involvement);

Level II and III more common, also IV, V, and VI

I, 60%

 

Neck mass is a frequent presentation

II, 40%

 

III, 30%

 

IV, 15%

 

Tonsil, tonsillar pillar, and soft palate

Tobacco and alcohol are the most significant risk factors

Tonsillar fossa: more advanced at presentation: 75% stage III or IV, pain, dysphagia, weight loss, and neck mass

Tonsillar pillar T2, 38%

Tonsillar fossa, 93% (stage I) to 17% (stage IV)

 

Tonsillar fossa T2, 68% (55% present with N2 or N3 disease)

Soft palate, 85% (stage I) to 21% (stage IV)

 

Soft palate: More indolent, may present as erythroplakia

 

Posterior pharyngeal wall

Advanced at diagnosis (silent location);

Clinically palpable nodes

By stage:

 

Pain, bleeding, and weight loss;

T1, 25%

I, 75%

 

Neck mass is common initial symptom

T2, 30%

II, 70%

 

T3, 66%

III, 42%

 

T4, 75%

IV, 27%

 

Bilateral involvement is common

 

Supraglottis

35% of laryngeal cancers

Most arise in epiglottis; early lymph node involvement due to extensive lymphatic drainage; two-thirds of patients have nodal metastases at diagnosis

Overall rate:

By stage:

 

T1, 63%; T2, 70%; T3, 79%; T4, 73%

I, 70%–100%

 

Levels II, III, and IV more common

II, 50%–90%

 

III, 45%–70%

 

IV, 20%–60%

 

Glottis

Most common laryngeal cancer

Most favorable prognosis; late lymph node involvement; usually well differentiated, but with infiltrative growth pattern; hoarseness is an early symptom, 70% have localized disease at diagnosis;

Sparse lymphatic drainage, early lesions rarely metastasize to lymph nodes. Clinically positive: T1, T2 < 2%

T1, 74%–86%

 

Levels II, III, and IV more common

T2, 67%–75%

 

T3, T4, 20%–25%

T3, 55%

 

T4, 50%

 

Subglottis

Rare, 1%–8% of laryngeal cancers

Poorly differentiated, infiltrative growth pattern unrestricted by tissue barriers; rarely causes hoarseness, may cause dyspnea from airway involvement; two-thirds of patients have metastatic disease at presentation

20%–30% overall

26% overall

 

Pretracheal and paratracheal nodes more commonly involved

 

TABLE 1.6. Head and Neck Cancer: Hypopharynx, Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx

Site

Epidemiology

Natural history and common presenting symptoms

Nodal involvement

Prognosis (5-yr survival)

M:F, male-to-female ratio; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus.

Hypopharynx

2,500 new cases yearly in United States; etiology: tobacco, alcohol, and nutritional abnormalities

Aggressive, diffuse local spread, early lymph node involvement; occult metastases to thyroid and paratracheal node chain; pain, neck stiffness (retropharyngeal nodes), otalgia (cranial nerve X), irritation, and mucus retention
50% present as neck mass; high risk of distant metastases

Abundant lymphatic drainage
Up to 60% have clinically positive lymph nodes at diagnosis

Survival varies between sites within hypopharynx T1, T2, 40%
T3–T4, 16%–37%

Nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses

Rare, 0.75/100,000 occurrence in United States
Nasal cavity and maxillary sinus, four-fifths of all cases
M:F, 2:1
Increased risk with exposure to furniture, shoe, textile industries; nickel, chromium, mustard gas, isopropyl alcohol, and radium

Nonhealing ulcer, occasional bleeding, unilateral nasal obstruction, dental pain, loose teeth, ill-fitting dentures, trismus, diplopia, proptosis, epiphora, anosmia, and headache, depending of site of invasion
Usually advanced at presentation

10%–20% clinically positive nodes
Levels I and II more common

60% for all sites all stages, 30% for T4
Principal determinant for survival is local recurrence

Nasopharynx

Rare (< 1/100,000) except in North Africa, Southeast Asia, and China, far northern hemisphere
Associated with EBV, diet, genetic factors

Most common initial presentation: neck mass
Other presentations: otitis media, nasal obstruction, tinnitus, pain, and cranial nerve involvement

Clinically positive:
WHO I, 60%
WHO II and III, 80%–90%

T1, 37%–60%
T2, 46%–68%
T3, 16%–25%
T4, 11%–40%

SCREENING

Careful examination of the head and neck is warranted in individuals with risk factors or suggestive symptoms. Mucosal abnormalities and palpable neck masses should be biopsied (see the section, Diagnosis).

The United States Preventive Task Force (http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm) does not recommend regular screening for oral cancer in the general population but recommends counseling for cessation of tobacco use and limitation of alcohol intake. The American Cancer Society (http://www.cancer.org) recommends oral examination or dental appointments. The oral examination should include inspection of all mucosal areas, assessment of range of motion of tongue, bimanual palpation of floor of mouth, palpation of the tongue, and assessment of dental health. Any of the complaints described earlier require evaluation, especially if symptoms persist for more than 4 weeks or after treatment for presumed infection.

TREATMENT

The management of patients with head and neck cancer is complex. The choice of treatment modality depends on the stage and site of disease. Patients with locally advanced disease should be evaluated (prosthodontics, nutrition, speech, and swallowing) by a multidisciplinary team including otolaryngologist or head and neck surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist, medical oncologist, dentist, and personnel involved in rehabilitation before treatment is initiated.

In general, either surgery or radiation is effective as single-modality therapy for patients with early-stage disease (stage I or II) for most sites. The choice of modality depends on local expertise, patient preference, and functional result. For the 60% of patients with locally advanced disease (stage III, IV, and M0), combined-modality therapy is indicated.

Surgery

The nature of the surgical procedure is determined primarily by the size of the tumor and the structures involved. Extensive surgeries and those involving function of the tongue

P.12

 

P.13

 

P.14

 

P.15


frequently require myocutaneous flaps or microvascular free flaps to achieve a more functional reconstruction.

Resectability depends on the experience of the surgeon and the rehabilitation team. In general, a tumor is unresectable if the surgeon believes that all of the gross tumor cannot be removed or that local and distant control will not be achieved after surgery even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Generally, involvement of the skull base, pterygoid, and deep neck musculature, and of the major vessels portends a poor outcome with surgery as a primary modality.

Cervical lymph node dissections may be elective or therapeutic. Elective neck dissections are done at the time of surgery in patients with necks that are clinically negative when the risk of a positive lymph node is at least 30%. Therapeutic neck dissections are done for clinically obvious masses. Cervical lymph node dissections are classified as radical, modified radical, or selective. The radical dissection includes removal of all lymph nodes in the neck from levels I to V (Fig. 1.2), including removal of the internal jugular vein, spinal accessory nerve, and sternocleidomastoid muscle. This surgery is now rarely performed because of excessive morbidity, especially loss of shoulder function. The modified radical dissection preserves one or more of the nonlymphatic structures. In selective neck dissections, only certain levels of lymph nodes are removed on the basis of the specific lymphatic drainage from the primary site. With no palpable or CT scan evidence of clinical nodal involvement, nodal metastases will be present beyond the confines of an appropriate selective neck dissection less than 10% of the time. Sentinel lymph node dissection and PET scanning are currently being evaluated for use in diagnosing positive lymph nodes in patients with necks that are clinically negative.

Radiation Therapy

The use of radiation as a single therapy in early-stage tumors (i.e., T1 and T2) is as efficacious as surgery. The choice of therapy depends on expected quality of life, functional outcome, sequelae of therapy, and options for treatment in case of recurrence.

In locally advanced tumors (i.e., T3 and T4), radiation therapy is combined with surgery. In general, postoperative radiation is preferred over preoperative radiation according to the results of two randomized prospective studies that show superior local control and minimally increased survival in the postoperative radiation arm in hypopharyngeal cancer patients (23).

Postoperative radiotherapy is recommended for patients at high risk for local recurrence [i.e., T4 tumor, close or positive margins (<5 mm), perineural or perilymphatic or vascular invasion by the tumor, multiple or large positive nodes, and/or extracapsular invasion (23)].

The radiation type (i.e., dose, fractionation regimen, and indication for brachytherapy) varies for specific sites and for definitive versus adjuvant therapy. The standard fractionation regimen in the United States is 1.8 to 2.0 Gy once daily, 5 days per week. The total dose of irradiation for definitive treatment is in the range of 70 to 80 Gy depending on the treatment schedule given and on the ability to shield normal tissue. Recent large randomized trials of hyperfractionated accelerated radiation as the primary treatment modality in locally advanced disease have shown improved local control but no or minimally increased survival with b.i.d. or t.i.d. fractionation as well as with the “concomitant boost” technique, in which radiation is given daily early in the course, then twice daily at the end of the course, with the second treatment representing a “boost” volume (24,25). Most of these regimens result in increased acute toxicities but similar long-term toxicities compared to daily fractionation. Conformal and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy techniques are being used to conform and confine the radiation dose to the tumor while maximally sparing the normal tissue, particularly salivary glands (26,27).

Common severe acute radiation toxicity includes epidermitis, mucositis, loss of taste, xerostomia, dysphagia, and hair loss. Dental evaluation and necessary extractions should be performed before radiation because dental extractions in a radiated mandible can lead to osteonecrosis (28). Dentulous patients should be given prophylactic fluoride. Patients receiving radiation are at high risk for tooth decay due to the xerostomia caused by injury to the salivary glands as well as mucosal damage. The drug amifostine has been shown in a randomized trial to decrease the

P.16


incidence of chronic severe radiation-induced xerostomia from 57% to 34% in patients receiving postoperative radiation (single agent) to a maximal dose of 60 cGy (29).

Brachytherapy can be used as a definitive treatment for early-stage tumors or combined with external beam radiation in more advanced lesions in selected tumors (e.g., tongue, floor of mouth, tonsil, and nasopharynx) with excellent results. Brachytherapy is an option for recurrent cancers of the head and neck, particularly in previously irradiated patients.

Chemotherapy

Until relatively recently, chemotherapy was used mainly for palliation of patients with locally recurrent or disseminated disease without proven survival advantage. Combination chemotherapy yields higher response rates but has increased toxicity and no proven survival advantage when compared with single agents. The choice of single-agent or combination chemotherapy depends on the patient's preference and performance status.

Single agents with more than 10% response activity are listed in Table 1.7(30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50). Several Combination regimens have been developed to improve response rates. (see Table 1.8) (51,52,53,54,55,56,57). The combination of cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) produces a 70% response rate and a 27% complete remission (CR) rate in chemotherapy-naive patients (58), but the response rate is 30% to 35% in patients who have relapsed after radiation therapy.

TABLE 1.7. Active Chemotherapeutic Agents for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck

Drug

Dose

Response rate

Median survival

Reference

Comments

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CI, continuous infusion; UFT, uracil/ftorafur; LV, leucovorin; G-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor; MTA, multi-targeted antifolate.

Methotrexate

40–60 mg/m2/wk

16%–23.5%

6 mo

30,31,32

Better response rates reported in patients not exposed to chemoradiation or platinum

Cisplatin

50 mg/m2 d1–8, 80–100 mg/m2 q21–28d

8%–28.6%

6 mo

30,31,32

 

Carboplatin

60–80 mg/m2 qd × 5 q4–5wk or 400 mg/m2q4wk

24%–26%

26 wk

33, 34

 

Oxaliplatin 5-FU

130 mg/m2 q3wk 1 g/m2/24 h CI for 9–120 h q3wk

6%–13%

5 mo

35

 

72%

36

8 of 11 patients, previously untreated

UFT/LV

300 mg/m2/d and LV 90 mg 3 × daily for 28 d every 35 d 600 mg/d daily

21%

8.7 mo

37, 38

 

32.4%

Paclitaxel

250 mg/m2 over 24 h, with G-CSF 80 mg/m2/wk

36%–40%

9.2 mo

39, 40

 

9.3%

235 d

Docetaxel

80–100 mg/m2 q21d

11%–42%

 

41,42,43,44

11% in platinum-refractory patients

35–45 mg/m2/wk

three of seven pretreated head/neck cancer patients

not reported for head and neck

Pemetrexed (LY231514)

500 mg/m2 q21d

26%

7.3 mo

45

 

Irinotecan

75 mg/m2/wk × 2 q3 wk or 75–125 mg/m2/wk × 4q5 wk

14.2%

214 d

46

 

26.3%

Gemcitabine

800–1,250 mg/m2weekly × 3q4 wk

13%

 

47

 

Vinorelbine

30 mg/m2/wk

7.5%–16%

32 wk

48, 49

 

Gefitinib

   500 mg/d

10.6%

8.1 mo

50

Prior systemic therapy allowed

TABLE 1.8. Active Combination Chemotherapeutic Regimens for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck

Regimen

Response rate

Median survival

Reference

Comments

Phase III Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/d CI × 96 h q21d

32%

6.6 mo

51

277 patients
No prior chemotherapy
Doses modified ≤ 25% toxicity or lack of toxicity

Carboplatin 300 mg/m2 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/d CI × 96 h q28d

21%

5 mo

 

 

Methotrexate 40 mg/m2/wk

10%

5.6 mo

 

 

Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d 1 5-FU 600 mg/m2over 4 h d 2–5 Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 d 2, 8 q28d

55%

9.7+ mo

52

80 patients
No prior chemotherapy

Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2(3 h infusion) q21 d

28%

9 mo
30% 1 yr survival

53

No significant difference from cisplatin-5FU in efficacy or quality of life; cisplatin and paclitaxel may have fewer toxicities compared to cisplatin and 5-FU

Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/d; CI × 96 h q21d

23%

8 mo
41% 1 yr survival

 

 

Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h infusion) Ifosfamide 1,000 mg/m2 2 h infusion d 1–3 Mesna 600 mg/m2 d 1–3 Carboplatin AUC6 d 1 Or Cisplatin 60 mg/m2 d 1 q21—28d

58–59%

8.8–9.1 mo

54, 55

Few patients had prior chemotherapy

Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 d 1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d 2; 5-FU 1 g/m2/d on d 2–5 continuous infusion every 21 d

60%

6 mo (range 1–26 mo)

56

Phase I/II trial

37% 1 yr survival

All had prior radiation, but were chemotherapy naive.

Docetaxel 80 mg/m2 d 1, cisplatin 40 mg/m2 d 2, 3 and 5-FU 1 g/m2/d continuous infusion d 1–3 q28 d

44%

11 mo (range 1–18 mo)

57

Most patients had prior radiation but not prior chemotherapy

49% 1 yr survival

G-CSF needed-15% had febrile neutropenia

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens and the single agent methotrexate are the most commonly used regimens for metastatic disease. Carboplatin may be slightly less active than cisplatin for head and neck squamous cancer, but carboplatin combinations with other chemotherapy agents are generally better tolerated than those with cisplatin. Carboplatin is preferred in patients at high risk for cisplatin toxicity, that is, those with renal dysfunction, neuropathy, or hearing loss (59).

Both docetaxel and paclitaxel have shown antitumor activity (39,40,41,42,43,44). Several dosing schedules for paclitaxel have been investigated. Three-hour infusions are probably the best balance between theoretically optimum exposure and tolerable toxicity (60). Docetaxel is usually administered at doses of 60 to 100 mg per m2 every 3 to 4 weeks. Weekly schedules are being evaluated for both drugs. Taxane combinations, including paclitaxel with ifosfamide and cisplatin or carboplatin, and docetaxel with cisplatin and 5-FU (61) show promising response rates.

Prior to the use of taxane combinations, meta-analyses and randomized trials demonstrated improved response for cisplatin compared with methotrexate, improved response for cisplatin and 5-FU combination compared with single drugs, and improved response for cisplatin and 5-FU combination when compared with other regimens for treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cancer (62,63). In the metastatic or recurrent setting, the response rate of cisplatin and infusional 5-FU combination (Table 1.8) is approximately 30%, with less than 10% complete responses. A randomized trial of cisplatin and 5-FU versus carboplatin (300 mg per m2) and 5-FU versus weekly methotrexate in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cancers demonstrated response rates of 32%, 21%, and 10%, respectively. Median survival was not improved by combination chemotherapy (6.6, 5.0, and 5.6 months, respectively) (51).

The role of chemotherapy has expanded significantly over the last decade because of the results of clinical trials incorporating chemotherapy in multimodality regimens for previously untreated disease.

Studies have evaluated the use of chemotherapy administered before (i.e., neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy), during (i.e., concomitant chemotherapy), or after (i.e., adjuvant chemotherapy) radiation therapy or surgery.

Combined modality (chemoradiation) is indicated for patients with locally advanced disease that would require total laryngectomy if treated by surgery and who wish to preserve the larynx, for patients who are technically resectable but who are not medically fit enough for surgery, and for patients with technically unresectable locally advanced cancer. In the patient who presents with locally advanced tumor concomitant with distant metastasis, local control of the disease may prevent infectious and necrotic complications.

P.17

 

P.18

 

P.19

 

Induction Chemotherapy

Induction chemotherapy followed by definitive radiation therapy in patients responding to chemotherapy has been studied for organ preservation in patients with locally advanced cancers of the larynx and of the hypopharynx. No significant survival difference has been demonstrated for chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy compared to surgery followed by radiotherapy in these patients (64,65). Close follow-up is indicated in the event that salvage surgery is needed. For laryngeal cancer, concomitant cisplatin and radiation therapy leads to better local control and organ preservation than neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation or radiation alone (66). Induction chemotherapy followed by radiation did not show any benefit when compared to radiation alone.

Presently, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy can be considered standard only for patients with previously untreated locally advanced squamous cancers in the hypopharynx. Cisplatin, 100 mg per m2 IV, on day 1 and 5-FU, 1,000 mg per m2 daily as continuous IV infusion, for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5), repeated every 3 weeks, followed by radiation therapy in patients who were complete responders exhibited equivalent survival rates in a phase III trial compared to surgery followed by radiation therapy (65). Induction chemotherapy does not increase surgical or radiation therapy complications. Prognostic factors for survival include performance status, tumor site, and stage.

CONCOMITANT CHEMORADIATION

The rationale for concomitant chemoradiation is based on experimental evidence of synergism between chemotherapy and radiation that is theoretically mediated by interference of chemotherapy with multiple intracellular radiation-induced stress-response pathways involved in apoptosis, proliferation, and DNA repair (67). The finding that certain chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., cisplatin, 5-FU, taxanes, and hydroxyurea) can induce radiosensitivity and increase log cell kill for radiation supports this treatment strategy. Cisplatin, the most extensively evaluated drug in recent large randomized trials, has the advantage of not having mucositis as toxicity, although as a radiation enhancer, it does increase radiation-induced mucositis.

Recent meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials published before 1994 show that for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, concomitant chemoradiation produces a small but significant survival advantage of about 8% compared to radiation therapy alone (68,69,70). The U.S. intergroup compared concomitant cisplatin and radiation to split-course radiation with cisplatin and 5-FU to standard radiation alone in patients with unresectable head and neck squamous cancer and showed that concurrent cisplatin at 100 mg per m2 every 21 days with daily radiation significantly improved survival rates (71). A randomized trial of cisplatin and 5-FU followed by radiation versus concurrent cisplatin and 5-FU with radiation in patients with unresectable head and neck cancer showed similar survival rates but improved locoregional control for the concomitant arm. This early study highlighted the importance of aggressive supportive care for concomitant regimens, including adequate fluid and electrolyte support (72). Concomitant platinum-based chemoradiation has become standard therapy for patients with unresectable advanced head and neck cancer with good performance status.

Although no randomized phase III trial has been done, results using taxanes with 5-FU and/or cisplatin show promising results as do regimens containing 5-FU and hydroxyurea with concomitant twice-daily radiation, with both chemotherapy and radiation administered together every other week (73). A phase randomized II study compared three regimens of concurrent chemoradiation for stage III or IV head and neck squamous carcinoma in 241 patients: a continuous infusion of cisplatin (10 mg/m2/day) and 5-FU (400 mg per m2) daily for the final 10 days of once-daily radiation (chemotherapy boost), hydroxyurea (1 g every 12 hours) and 5-FU (800 mg/m2/day) continuous infusion for 5 days with radiation (entire regimen given every other week), or paclitaxel (30 mg per m2) and cisplatin (20 mg per m2) given weekly with daily radiation. Grade 4 or greater toxicity occurred in 22%, 29%, and 23% of patients in each arm, respectively, although three deaths occurred in the chemotherapy boost arm. The estimated

P.20


2-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 38.2% and 57.4%, 48.6% and 69.4%, and 51.3% and 66.6%, respectively (74).

Current studies are evaluating the possibility that induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and/or surgery can increase locoregional disease-free and overall survival rates for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cancer.

Agents that inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling are being evaluated as radiation enhancers in head and neck squamous cancers. More than 90% of head and neck squamous cancers express EGFR (75), and increased expression has been correlated with poorer survival rates after radiation therapy (76,77). Upregulation of EGFR after radiation has been noted in cell lines (78). Blocking EGFR signals enhances radiosensitivity and chemotherapy effects in preclinical models (79). Clinical studies are ongoing with combinations of EGFR inhibitors with radiation and with standard chemotherapy agents. A recent phase III trial of cisplatin with either placebo or the EGFR antibody C225 in patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck squamous cancer found no significant advantage in adding the EGFR inhibitor (80). Additional molecular alterations, in addition to expressing EGFR, are likely to be important for response to EGFR inhibitors.

Elective lymph node dissection is often carried out after chemoradiation in patients with N2, N3, or multiple nodes at diagnosis, regardless of nodal response to chemoradiation, when complete response is obtained at the primary site. N2 or greater nodes often (about 20%) harbor tumor even if a clinically complete response is obtained in the neck with chemoradiation (81). Surgical salvage may be attempted if complete control is not achieved at the primary or locoregional site. Major complications with surgical salvage are found in about 52% of patients previously treated with organ-preserving regimens (82).

As expected, concomitant regimens are associated with increased toxicity compared with sequential chemoradiation. Patients should be followed closely for dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and adequacy of nutritional intake. Most centers place enteral feeding tubes prophylactically prior to the start of treatment for patients undergoing concomitant chemoradiation because the incidence of grade 3 or greater mucositis is 70% to 80%.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy

A large randomized study in resected patients with stage III or IV disease compared adjuvant radiation therapy with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation. This trial showed improved local control and overall survival rates approaching statistical significance for a subset of patients treated with chemotherapy who were at high risk for local recurrence. Patients with low-risk disease (negative resection margins, one or no positive nodes, and no extracapsular spread of tumor) did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (83).

Adjuvant concomitant cisplatin and radiation in patients at high risk for recurrence after surgery has been studied both in Europe and in the United States. Both studies found a possible benefit in disease-free or overall survival for patients receiving concomitant cisplatin and radiation (84,85).

SITE-SPECIFIC HEAD AND NECK TUMORS

Oral Cavity

The oral cavity includes the lip, anterior two thirds of the tongue, floor of the mouth, buccal mucosa, gingiva, hard palate, and retromolar trigone. Approximately 20,000 new cases are diagnosed annually in the United States. Squamous cell carcinoma is the histologic type observed in most cases.

The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for specific subsites are shown inTable 1.4. Early lesions (stages I and II) are treated with surgery or radiation therapy as single-modality therapy. For resectable locally advanced disease (stages III and IV, and M0), surgery followed by radiation therapy is

P.21


indicated (see FIG. 1.4). Definitive radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy is an option for patients with resectable disease at any stage who have high medical or surgical risks, or according to patient preference (based on discussions about quality of life, functional outcome, and toxicity profile of each treatment). Treatment for locally advanced and metastatic disease is discussed in subsequent text.

 

FIG. 1.4. Treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (M0).

Oropharynx

The oropharynx includes the base of the tongue, tonsils, posterior pharyngeal wall, and the soft palate.

The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for specific subsites of the oropharynx are shown in Table 1.5. Treatment may include primary surgery and postoperative radiotherapy or primary radiation therapy, with chemotherapy if stage III or IV, thereby reserving surgery for management of regional node metastases or for salvage of persistent disease. Chemoradiation is an acceptable standard of care for treating locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer when organ preservation is desired. Randomized trials show that concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve locoregional control and survival compared with radiotherapy (86). Increased complexity and toxicity of this combined-modality approach mandates that the patient has adequate performance status and psychosocial resources.

P.22

 

Larynx

More than 9,500 cases of laryngeal cancer were diagnosed in the United States in 2003. Risk factors are a history of tobacco and/or alcohol intake. In addition, certain dietary factors and exposure to wood dust, nitrogen mustard, asbestos, and nickel have been implicated as etiologic factors. The male-to-female ratio for laryngeal cancer is 4.5:1, with a peak incidence in the sixth decade of life. This disease is 50% more common in African Americans than in whites and 100% more common in whites than in Hispanics and Asians. More than 95% of laryngeal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas.

Laryngeal cancers can be supraglottic, glottic, and/or subglottic. The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for specific subsites of the larynx are shown in Table 1.5.

Early cancers not requiring laryngectomy (T1–T2 N0) are usually treated with radiation. If lymph nodes are involved, neck dissection and/or neck radiation is indicated. Locally advanced resectable tumors (T3–T4 or T2 N+) may be treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation if locoregional risk factors are present (i.e., close or positive margins, T4 tumor, lymphatic or vascular or perineural involvement, vascular invasion, multiple positive nodes, extracapsular invasion, subglottic extension, or prior tracheostomy). An alternative is the use of combined radiation and chemotherapy. In 1991, the Veterans Administration Laryngeal Study Group trial established (64) that sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin and infusional 5-FU followed by radiation therapy in highly responsive patients resulted in equivalent survival and a larynx preservation rate of about 66% compared to treatment with surgery followed by radiation. However, high volume T4 disease (with destruction of larynx or massive extension of supraglottic laryngeal cancer to the base of tongue) should be treated with surgery followed by radiation therapy rather than by organ preservation therapy, if possible.

A subsequent randomized phase III trial conducted in the United States comparing radiation therapy alone, sequential chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and concomitant cisplatin and radiation therapy for organ preservation in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer demonstrated that concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per m2 on days 1, 22, and 43) and radiation therapy resulted in better laryngectomy-free survival, larynx preservation rate, and local–regional control rate than either sequential (induction) cisplatin and 5-FU followed by radiation therapy or radiation therapy alone. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy was shown to have no advantage over radiotherapy alone. Survival rate was not significantly different for the three treatments, in part reflecting the ability to surgically salvage laryngeal cancer patients treated for organ preservation. It is of interest to note that patients who received any chemotherapy regardless of receiving radiotherapy or not had a lower metastatic rate at 2 years than did patients who received radiation alone (66).

Speech rehabilitation is critically important for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer who are undergoing total laryngectomy. Phonation options include a mechanical electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal puncture. Most patients can obtain satisfactory communication through one of these techniques.

Patients whose lesions are unresectable or patients who are considered to have high surgical risks are candidates for definitive radiation therapy with chemotherapy if performance status is good. The treatment for a patient with metastatic disease is discussed later.

Hypopharynx

The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for specific subsites of the hypopharynx are shown in Table 1.6.

Early cancers not requiring laryngectomy (most T1 N0–N1; small T2 N0) can be treated with surgery or radiation. Locally advanced resectable tumors (T3–T4 any N) may be treated with surgery followed by radiation or sequential or concomitant chemoradiation. In these cases, surgery involves total laryngectomy and partial or total pharyngectomy and neck dissection.

P.23


Even with this radical surgery and the consequent functional impairment of the tumor, the survival prognosis is poor.

Combined-modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation allows organ function preservation with chances of survival being equivalent to that after surgery. Patients who achieve a CR at the primary site after two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy (Table 1.6) receive definitive radiation, whereas those achieving less than CR at the primary site undergo surgery. A large randomized trial is in progress comparing induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy to concomitant chemoradiation in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. The outcome of this trial will provide more definitive information on the most efficacious therapy.

Patients who are prone to high surgical or medical risks can be treated with radiation. The management of metastatic disease is discussed later.

Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses

The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for carcinomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are shown in Table 1.6.

Most tumors are squamous cell carcinomas and are usually slow growing with low incidence of metastasis.

Carcinomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are usually detected in patients in advanced stages because of the relatively silent tumor location. Treatment follows the same general guidelines as those for oral cancer. If feasible, surgery is the preferred primary management.

Nasopharynx

The epidemiology, natural history, common presenting symptoms, risk of nodal involvement, and prognosis for nasopharyngeal cancer are shown in Table 1.6. It is extremely rare in most parts of the world, with an incidence of less than 1 case per 100,000 population. However, it is endemic in certain areas, including North Africa, Southeast Asia, China, and the far northern hemisphere. EBV is strongly associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This association has been demonstrated by serologic studies and by the detection of the viral genome in tumor samples. Diet (salt-cured fish and meat) and genetic susceptibility are other probable risk factors; tobacco and alcohol are not risk factors, except in a minority of cases.

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification divides nasopharyngeal carcinoma into three types: type I, keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma; type II, nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma; and type III, undifferentiated carcinoma (20). Type II, the most common, is also sometimes referred to as lymphoepithelioma because of the characteristic exuberant lymphoid infiltrate accompanying malignant epithelial cells.

The most common initial presentation is a neck mass. Other presenting signs and symptoms are related to tumor growth, with resulting compression or infiltration of neighboring organs. These include serous otitis media, nasal obstruction, tinnitus, pain, and involvement of one or multiple cranial nerves.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma has a high metastatic potential to regional nodes and distant sites. WHO type I has the greatest propensity for uncontrolled local tumor growth and the lowest propensity for metastatic spread (60% clinically positive nodes) compared with WHO type II and type III cancers (80% to 90% clinically positive nodes). Even though type I WHO cancer is associated with a lower incidence of lymphatic and distant metastases than are types II and III, its prognosis is worse because of a higher incidence of deaths from uncontrolled primary tumors and nodal metastases.

The prognoses for different stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma are shown in Table 1.6.

General treatment guidelines are shown in FIG. 1.5. Surgery is usually not recommended because of anatomic considerations and the pattern of spread of the cancer via the retropharyngeal lymphatics. Radiation has been the standard treatment, with good results (local control

P.24


rates: T1–T2, 70% to 90%; T3–T4, 30% to 65%), and remains the standard of care for early (stages I and II) cancer.

 

FIG. 1.5. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (M0).

In a randomized trial in the United States, concurrent cisplatin (cisplatin 100 mg per m2 every 21 to 28 days) and daily radiation followed by three courses of adjuvant cisplatin and 5-FU was shown to improve overall survival (76% for concurrent chemoradiation versus 46% for radiation therapy alone) (87). On the basis of this study, concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for locally advanced nonmetastatic (stages III and IV) nasopharyngeal cancer in the United States. Other drugs, such as taxanes, appear to have activity but have not been evaluated extensively.

ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK TUMORS: UNRESECTABLE, RECURRENT, AND METASTATIC DISEASE

In patients with good performance status (ECOG 0-1), concurrent radiation and chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable disease. In several recent trials, chemoradiation therapy was shown to improve the overall survival, disease-free survival, and/or local control when compared with radiation therapy alone. Several cisplatin- or carboplatin-containing regimens and several standard and altered fractionation-radiation regimens have been evaluated. In patients with poor performance status, radiation alone is a reasonable option.

Local or regional recurrences can sometimes be salvaged by radiation therapy or surgery. In patients unable to undergo resection, re-irradiation with a dose of 60 cGy with or without concomitant chemotherapy can achieve prolonged survivals in about 15% to 20% of highly selected patients (88). In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a second course of radiation may be delivered. If salvage is not possible, palliative treatment will be guided by the performance status of the patient.

Single-agent or combination chemotherapy is indicated for palliation of patients with good performance status with local or distant recurrence and of those patients presenting with distant metastasis. Combination chemotherapy achieves higher response rates at the cost of increased toxicity when compared with single-agent chemotherapy. The most active agents are listed in Table 1.7. Cisplatin plus infusional 5-FU (Table 1.8) or cisplatin with a taxane are the most commonly used combination-chemotherapy regimens. Weekly methotrexate or taxanes have also shown some activity in patients with advanced head and neck tumors. Oral agents, such as gefitinib (Iressa) may have some palliative effect (30,31,32,50). The choice of single-agent or combination chemotherapy (61) depends on preference and performance status of patients. Patients with good performance status, no prior chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent disease, and minimal tumor burden may benefit most from combination chemotherapy. A small subset of these patients may achieve durable CR and prolonged survival. However, the median response duration to combination or single-agent chemotherapy is about 3 months.

P.25

 

The median survival for patients with locally recurrent or disseminated disease is 6 to 9 months, and only 20% to 30% are alive at 1 year. No therapy has been shown to affect survival rate. Therefore, whenever possible, patients should be encouraged to enroll in clinical trials that evaluate new agents or new combination regimens.

Cancer of Unknown Primary Site (of the Head and Neck)

The work-up of a patient with a neck mass is shown in Fig. 1.3. In 10% of cases, a primary tumor is not found, and the term “cancer of unknown primary site” is used.

Cervical lymph node involvement (except supraclavicular) by carcinoma indicates a head and neck primary tumor. Unknown primary tumors of the head and neck are usually treated with neck dissection and radiation. The prognosis is roughly equivalent to cancers with the same N (nodal) status. Five-year survival ranges from 30% to 50% in patients treated definitively.

A supraclavicular mass often represents spread from an infraclavicular (thoracic or abdominal) cancer, and the work-up and treatment of these cancers is beyond the scope of this chapter.

Salivary Gland Cancer

Salivary gland cancers make up about 3% of all head and neck cancers diagnosed in the United States yearly. Tobacco and alcohol consumption are not risk factors, except possibly in women. Ionizing radiation and certain occupational exposures (e.g., in workers in rubber and automotive industries, wood workers, and farm workers) have been associated with the development of salivary gland cancer.

The salivary glands are classified as major (parotid, submandibular, and sublingual) and minor (distributed along upper aerodigestive tract, predominantly in the oral and nasal cavities and the paranasal sinuses). Most of the salivary gland cancers arise from the parotid glands; sublingual and minor salivary gland cancers are rare.

Most salivary gland tumors are benign, and the most common histology is pleomorphic adenoma, which is characterized by slow growth and few symptoms, and is most frequently seen in the parotid gland. The most common presentation of benign salivary gland tumors is asymptomatic swelling of the lip, the parotid, or the submandibular or the sublingual glands. Persistent pain or neurologic involvement (mucosal or tongue numbness and facial nerve weakness) suggests malignant disease. The benign salivary gland tumors are listed in Table 1.9.

TABLE 1.9. Salivary Gland Benign Tumors

Pleomorphic adenoma (benign mixed tumor)

Warthin tumor (papillary cystadenoma lymphomatosum)

Monomorphic adenoma

Benign lymphoepithelial lesion

Oncocytoma

Ductal papilloma

Sebaceous lymphadenoma

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of specific malignant salivary gland tumors are shown in Table 1.10.

TABLE 1.10. Salivary Gland Malignant Tumors: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis

Histology

Clinical characteristics

Prognosis

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Most common malignant tumor in major salivary glands. Most common in parotid glands (32%)

Low grade: 76%–95% 5-yr survival

Low grade: Local problems, long history, cure with aggressive resection. Rarely metastasizes

High grade: 30%–50% 5-yr survival

High grade: locally aggressive, invades nerves and vessels, and metastasizes early

 

Adenocarcinoma

16% of parotid and 9% of submandibular malignant tumors

76%–85% 5-yr survival

 

Grade correlates with survival

34%–71% 10-yr survival

 

Squamous cell carcinoma

Uncommon: 7% of parotid gland and 10% of submandibular gland malignant tumors

24% 5-yr survival

 

Grade correlates with survival

18% 10-yr survival

 

Squamous cell carcinoma of temple, auricular, and facial skin can metastasize to parotid nodes and can be confused with primary parotid tumor

 

Acinic cell carcinoma

<10% of all salivary gland malignant tumors

82% 5-yr survival

 

Low grade with slow growth, infrequent facial nerve involvement, infrequent and late metastases (lungs)

68% 10-yr survival

 

Regional metastasis in 5%–10% of patients

 

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

Most common malignant tumor in submandibular gland (41%), 11% of parotid gland

50%–90% 10 yr survival: 30%–67% 15 yr survival: 25%

 

High incidence of nerve invasion, which compromises local control

 

40% of patients develop metastases. Most common site of metastases is the lung. Patients may live many years with lung metastasis, but visceral or bone metastases indicate poor prognosis

 

Malignant mixed tumor

14% of parotid gland and 12% of submandibular gland cancers

31%–65%

 

May originate in previous pleomorphic adenoma

 

Lymph node involvement in 25% of cases

10 yr; 23%–30%

 

26%–32% of patients develop metastases

 

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for all localized stages of salivary gland tumors. Postoperative radiation is indicated for localized tumors of high-grade histology, that are large, with close or positive margins, and/or positive regional lymph nodes. Radiation is the primary treatment for unresectable tumors. The role of chemotherapy is limited to the management of locally recurrent, unresectable disease or distant metastatic disease. There is no established standard chemotherapy for salivary gland cancer. Regimens employing cisplatin, carboplatin, anthracyclines, taxanes, cyclophosphamide, and 5-FU result in transient responses in 14% to

P.26


30% of patients with adenocarcinoma or mucoepidermoid carcinoma (89), but the effect on survival is unknown. Patients with good performance status should be encouraged to enter clinical trials.

Follow-up

Curative treatment of patients with head and neck cancer should be followed by a comprehensive head and neck physical examination every 1 to 3 months during the first year after

P.27


treatment, every 2 to 4 months during the second year, every 3 to 6 months from years 3 to 5, and every 6 to 12 months after year 5. The thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level should be checked every 3 to 6 months if the thyroid is irradiated. Generally, thyroid hormone replacement therapy should begin when, and if, TSH remains stably elevated, before symptoms of hypothyroidism appear. Up to 50% of patients will develop hypothyroidism by 5 years after radiation therapy to the head and neck. Patients with nasopharyngeal tumors who were treated with radiation are at risk for pituitary failure (90,91).

The highest risk of relapse is during the first 3 years after treatment. After 3 years, a second primary tumor in the lung or head and neck is the most important cause of morbidity or mortality. Because of this risk, a semiannual chest radiograph is recommended. Some recurrences, as well as second primaries, can be treated with curative intent.

OTHER HEAD AND NECK TUMORS

Sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck are relatively rare. Of head and neck sarcomas, 80% are seen in adults and 20% are in children. These tumors are heterogeneous and can present in any head and neck site, commonly as a submucosal or subcutaneous painless mass. In the hypopharynx and nasopharynx, the presenting symptoms may be cranial nerve abnormalities or airway or swallowing difficulties. As in sarcomas at other sites, grade is an important prognostic indicator. High-grade, aggressive tumors such as malignant fibrous histiocytoma, angiosarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, neurofibrosarcoma, and soft part sarcomas tend to be locally aggressive and spread along neurovascular structures, fascia, and bone. In addition to aggressive local behavior, there is a high risk for metastatic disease, particularly in lung, bone, central nervous system, and liver. Metastatic disease may occur without local lymph node involvement. Sarcomas may arise after radiation therapy, but this is very uncommon in the head and neck region. The prognosis for these secondary sarcomas may be worse than for primary sarcomas.

Treatment depends on stage, age of the patient, tumor type, location, and size. Wide margin en bloc resection is the goal, but may not be possible because of the proximity of vital structures. Adjuvant postoperative radiation and/or brachytherapy can improve local control in aggressive sarcomas. The major indications for adjuvant radiation are high-grade sarcomas or positive margins, lesions greater than 5 cm, and recurrent sarcoma. Elective neck radiation is not necessary because the incidence of occult positive lymph nodes is low. Soft tissue and possibly osteogenic sarcomas may benefit from adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Such patients should be referred to clinical trials when possible. Overall survival rate approaches 60% for patients with sarcomas of the head and neck (92,93).

Melanoma

Mucosal melanomas represent less than 1.5% of all melanomas. About 50% of mucosal melanomas occur in the head and neck, and more than 20% of melanomas that occur in the head and neck region are mucosal. The age of diagnosis is 60 to 80 years. The hard palate is the most common site. Nearly one-third of these tumors are amelanotic. The proportion of mucosal melanomas is higher in African American and Hispanic populations than in white populations. Although rare in the United States, mucosal melanomas are more frequent in Japan and in some parts of Africa. Mucosal melanomas may be multiple, may have satellite lesions, may invade angiolymphatics, and can metastasize. They behave more aggressively than skin melanomas. Lymph node metastasis is observed at presentation in up to 48% of patients. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for local or locoregional disease. Prophylactic lymph node dissection is not recommended. Radiation, when used, is usually employed adjuvantly for positive margins or used palliatively for local recurrence or unresectability. Adjuvant use of radiation has not been shown to improve survival. Prophylactic nodal radiation is not recommended. Chemotherapy and

P.28


immunotherapy have been studied, but the effect of these interventions on survival when used as palliation or as adjuvant therapy has not been defined. Patients should be encouraged to enter clinical trials where available. Mean overall 5-year survival is 17% (range 0% to 48%) (94).

REFERENCES

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin2003;53:5–26.
  2. Rodu B, Jansson C. Smokeless Tobacco and Oral cancer: a review of the risk and determinants. 2004 Crit Rev Oral Bio Med 15(5);252–263.
  3. Norton SA. Betel: consumption and consequences. J Am Acad Dermatol1998;38(1):81–88.
  4. Sankaranarayanan R, Duffy SW, Day NE, et al. A case-control investigation of cancer of the oral tongue and the floor of the mouth in Southern India. Int J Cancer1989;44(4):617–621.
  5. Slaughter DL, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium: clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer1953;6:963–968.
  6. Schwartz LH, Ozsahin M, Xhang GN, et al. Synchronous and metachronous head and neck carcinomas. Cancer1994;74:1933–1938.
  7. Laccourreye O, Veivers FD, Hans S, et al. Metachronous second primary cancers after successful partial laryngectomy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the true vocal cord. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol2002;111:204–209.
  8. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Rubin P, et al. Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1989;17:449–456.
  9. Niedobitek G. Epstein-Barr virus infection in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol: Mol Pathol 2000;53:248–254.
  10. Mellin H, Friesland S, Lewensohn R, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical correlates, risk of relapse, and survival. Int J Cancer (Pred Oncol) 2000;89:300–304.
  11. McKaig RG, Baric RS, Olshan AF. Human papillomavirus and head and neck cancer: epidemiology and molecular biology. Head & Neck 1998;20:250–265.
  12. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, et al. Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst2000;92:709–720.
  13. Hong WK, Lippman SM, Hittelman WN, et al. Retinoid chemoprevention of aerodigestive cancer: from basic research to the clinic. Clin Cancer Res1995;1:677–686.
  14. Khuri F, Lee JJ, Lippman SM, et al. Isotretinoin effects on head and neck cancer recurrence and second primary tumors. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol2003;22:90a.
  15. van Zandwijk N, Dalesio O, Pastorino U, et al. EUROSCAN, a randomized trial of vitamin A and N-acetylcysteine in patients with head and neck cancer or lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst2000;92:977–986.
  16. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, et al. Risk factors for lung cancer and for intervention effects in CARET, the BETA-CAROTENE and Retinol Efficacy Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst1996; 88(21):1550–1559.
  17. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med1994;330:1029–1035.
  18. Albanes D, Heinonen OP, Taylor PR, et al. Alpha tocopherol and beta carotene supplements and lung cancer incidence in the alpha tocopherol, beta carotene cancer prevention study: effects of base-line characteristics and study compliance. J Natl Cancer Inst1996;88(21):1560–1570.
  19. Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Karp DD, et al. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of isotretinoin to prevent second primary tumors in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst2001;93(8):605–618.
  20. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming, ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
  21. Schechter NR, Gillenwater AM, Byers RM, et al. Can positron emission tomography improve the quality of care for head-and-neck cancer patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51(1):4–9.
  22. Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schoder H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol2002;20:4199–4208.
  23. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere A, et al. Precisely defining high-risk operable head and neck tumors based on RTOG #85-03 and #88-24: targets for postoperative radiochemotherapy? Head Neck 1998; 20:588–594.

P.29

 

  1. Dische S, Saunders M, Barrett A, et al. A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol1997;44:123–136.
  2. Fu KK, Pajak TF, Trotti A et al, RTOG. A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2000;48(1):7–16.
  3. Amdur RJ, Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, et al. Split-course versus continuous course irradiation in the postoperative setting for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1989;17(2):279–285.
  4. Marcial VA, Amato DA, Pajak TF. Patterns of failure after treatment for cancer of upper respiratory and digestive tracts: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Report. Cancer Treat Symp1983;2:33–40.
  5. Vissink A, Burlage FR, Spijkervet FKL, et al. Prevention and treatment of the consequences of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med2003;14(3):213–225.
  6. Brizel DM, Wasserman TH, Henke M, et al. Phase III randomized trial of amifostine as a radioprotector in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol2000;18(19):3339–3345.
  7. Hong WK, Schaefer S, Issell B, et al. Prospective randomized trial of methotrexate versus cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer1983; 52:206–210.
  8. Schornagel JH, Verweij J, deMulder PHM, et al. Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group Study. J Clin Oncol1995;13(7):1649–1655.
  9. Grose WE, Lehane DE, Dixon DO, et al. Comparison of methotrexate and cisplatin for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treat Rep1985;69(6):577–581.
  10. Eisenberger M, Hornedo J, Silva H, et al. Carboplatin (NSC 241240): an active platinum analog for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol1986;4(10):1506–1509.
  11. Al Sarraf M, Metch B, Kish J, et al. Platinum analogs in recurrent and advanced head and neck cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group and Wayne State University Study. Cancer Treat Rep1987;71(7-8): 723–726.
  12. Degardin M, Cappelaere P, Krakowski I, et al. Phase II trial of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in advanced, recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol Eur J Cancer1996;32B(4):278–279.
  13. Tapazoglou E, Kish J, Ensley J, et al. The activity of single-agent 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer. Cancer1986;57:1105–1109.
  14. Colevas AD, Amrein PC, Gomolin H, et al. A phase II study of combined oral uracil and ftorafur with leucovorin for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer2001; 92:326–331.
  15. Tanaka J, Inuyama Y, fujii M, et al. Clinical Trials on UFT I the treatment of head and neck cancer. Auris Nasus Larynx1985;12(Suppl. 2):S261–S266.
  16. Smith RE, Thornton DE, Allen J. A phase II trial of paclitaxel in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with correlative laboratory studies. Semin Oncol1995;22(3 Suppl. 6):41–46.
  17. Forastiere AA, Shank D, Neuberg D, et al. Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. Cancer1998;82:2270–2274.
  18. Numicot G, Merlano M. Second line treatment with docetaxel after failure of a platinum-based chemotherapy in squamous-cell head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol2002;13:331–333.
  19. Dreyfuss AI, Clark JR, Norris CM, et al. Docetaxel: an active drug for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol1996;14(5):1672–1678.
  20. Briasoulis E, Karavasilis V, Anastasopoulos D, et al. Weekly docetaxel in minimally pretreated cancer patients: a dose-escalation study focused on feasibility and cumulative toxicity of long-term administration. Ann Oncol1999;10:701–706.
  21. Catimel G, Verweij J, Mattijssen V, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere®), an active drug for the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol1994;5:533–537.
  22. Pivot X, Raymond E, Laguerre B, et al. Pemetrexed disodium in recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer2001;85(5):649–655.
  23. Murphy BA, Cmelak A, Burkey B, et al. The role of topoisomerases in head and neck cancer Oncology (Huntington) 2001;15(7 Suppl. 8):47–52.

P.30

 

  1. Catimel G, Vermorken JB, Clavel M, et al. A Phase II study of Gemcitabine (LY 188011) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol1994;5:543–547.
  2. Degardin M, Oliveira J, Geoffrois L, et al. An EORTC-ECSG phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol1998; 9:1103–1107.
  3. Saxman S, Mann B, Canfield V, et al. A phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol1998;21(4):398–400.
  4. Cohen EE, Rosen F, Stadler WM, et al. Phase II trial of ZD1839 in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol2003;21(10):1980–1987.
  5. Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol1992;10(8):1245–1251.
  6. Gebbia V, Mantovani G, Agostara B, et al. Treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with a combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil: a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol1995;6:987–991.
  7. Murphy B, Li Y, Cella D, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin & 5 fluorouracil (F) versus cisplatin & paclitaxel in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol2001;20:224a.
  8. Shin DM, Khuri FR, Glisson BS, et al. Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. Cancer2001;91:1316–1323.
  9. Shin DM, Glisson BS, Khuri FR, et al. Phase II trial of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol1998;16(4):1325–1330.
  10. Hussain M, Gadgeel S, Kucuk O, et al. Paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer1999;86:2364–2369.
  11. Janinis J, Papadakou M, Zidakis E, et al. Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in previously treated patients with advanced/recurrent head and neck cancer. Am J Clin Oncol (CCT) 2000;23(2):128–131.
  12. Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-Garcia E, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol1992;10:257–263.
  13. Forastiere AA. Overview of platinum chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol1994; 21(15 Suppl. 12):20–27.
  14. Takimoto CH, Rowinsky EK. Dose-intense paclitaxel: Déjà vu all over again? J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(15):2810–2814.
  15. Lamont EB, Vokes EE. Chemotherapy in the management of squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The Lancet2001;2:261–269.
  16. Browman GP, Cronin L. Standard chemotherapy in squamous cell head and neck cancer: what we have learned from randomized trials. Semin Oncol1994;21:311–319.
  17. Kish JA, Ensley JF, Jacobs J, et al. A randomized trial of cisplatin (CACP) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and CACP + 5-FU bolus for recurrent and advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer1985;56:2740–2744.
  18. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Study Group. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med1991;324:1685–1690.
  19. Lefebvre JL, Chevalier D, Lubomski B, et al. Larynx preservation in hypopharynx and lateral epilarynx cancer: preliminary results of EORTC randomized phase III trial 24891. J Natl Cancer Inst1996;88:890–899.
  20. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med2003;349(22):2091–2098.
  21. Dent P, Yacoub A, Contessa J, et al. Stress and radiation-induced activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Radiation Res2003;159:283–300.
  22. Bourhis J, Pignon JP. Meta-analyses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: what is the role of chemotherapy? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1999;13(4):769–775.
  23. El-Sayed S, Nelson N. Adjuvant and adjunctive chemotherapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: a meta-analysis of prospective and randomized trials. J Clin Oncol1996;14(3):838–847.
  24. Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C, et al, on behalf of the MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. The Lancet2000;355:949–955.
  25. Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL, et al. An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol2003;21(1):92–98.

P.31

 

  1. Taylor SG IV, Murthy AK, Vannetzel JM, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil infusion followed by radiation versus concomitant treatment in advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol1994:12(2):385–395.
  2. Vokes EE, Stenson K, Rosen FR, et al. Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by concomitant paclitaxel, fluorouracil and hydroxyurea chemotherapy: curative and organ-preserving therapy for advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol2003;21(2):320–326.
  3. Garden AS, Harris J, Vokes EE, et al. Preliminary results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group97-03: a randomized phase II trial of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(14):2856–2864.
  4. Grandis JR, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, et al. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst1998;90(11):824–832.
  5. Ang KK, Berkey BA, Tu X, et al. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res2002;62:7350–7356.
  6. Dassonville O, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. J Clin Oncol1993;10:1873–1878.
  7. Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Valerie KC, Chan W, et al. Altered expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and estrogen receptor in MCF-7 cells after single and repeated radiation exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1994;29:813–819.
  8. Huang SM, Harari PM. Modulation of radiation response after epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in squamous cell carcinomas: Inhibition of damage repair, cell cycle kinetics ad tumor angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res2000;6:2166–2174.
  9. Burtness BA, Li Y, Flood W, et al. Phase III trial comparing cisplatin + placebo to cisplatin + anti-epidermal growth factor antibody (EGF-R)C225 in patients with metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol2002;21:226a.
  10. Brizel DM, Albers ME, Fisher SR, et al. Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med1998;338:1798–1814.
  11. Weber RS, Berkey MS, Forastiere A, et al. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2003;129:44–49.
  12. Laramore G, Scott C, Al-Sarraf M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: report on intergroup study 0034. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1992;23:705–713.
  13. Cooper JS, Pajak TJ, Forastiere AA, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New Engl J Med2004; 350(19):1973–1944.
  14. Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, et al. Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004; 350(19): 1945–52.
  15. Calais G, Alfonsi M, Bardet E, et al. Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst1999;91(24):2081–2086.
  16. Al Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PGS, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol1998; 16(4):1310–1317.
  17. Kao J, Garofalo MC, Milano MT, et al. Reirradiation of recurrent and second primary head and neck malignancies: a comprehensive review. Cancer Treat Rev2003;29:21–30.
  18. Forastiere A, Licitra L, Grandi C, et al. Major and minor salivary glands tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol2003;45:215–225.
  19. Mercado G, Adelstein DJ, Saxton JP, et al. Hypothyroidism: a frequent event after radiotherapy and after radiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with head and neck carcinoma. Cancer2001; 92:2892–2897.
  20. Colevas AD, Read R, Thornhill J, et al. Hypothyroidism incidence after multimodality treatment for stage III and IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2001; 51(3):599–604.
  21. Pellitteri PK, Ferlito A, Bradley PJ, et al. Management of sarcomas of the head and neck in adults. Oral Oncol2003;39:2–12.
  22. Patel SG, Meyers P, Huvos AG, et al. Improved outcomes in patients with osteogenic sarcoma of the head and neck. Cancer2002;95:1495–1503.
  23. Lengyel E, Gilde K, Remenar E, et al. Malignant mucosal melanoma of the head and neck–a review. Pathol Oncol Res2003;9(1):7–12.