Principles and Practice of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in ART 1st ed.

37. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: Can We Eliminate It as a Complication of ART?

Mala Arora  and Ritika Arora2

(1)

Infertility and IVF, Noble IVF Centre, Sector-14, Market, Faridabad, Haryana, 121007, India

(2)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Fertility and Reproductive Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Mala Arora

Email: narindamala@gmail.com

Abstract

With the explosive increase in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles worldwide, the morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) cannot be ignored. Researchers and clinicians all over the world are moving toward newer modifications to achieve the goal of OHSS-free clinic and eliminating it as a complication [1]. Segmentation of the IVF cycle with a combination of GnRH-antagonist protocol with GnRH-agonist (GnRHa) trigger followed by embryo/oocyte freezing with subsequent embryo transfer can probably eliminate the risk of OHSS after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In case of embryo transfer in COS cycle, combined use of a GnRH-antagonist protocol with GnRHa trigger followed by single embryo transfer (SET), preferably blastocyst, favors reduction in the incidence of OHSS. But due to luteolytic action of agonist trigger, intensive luteal phase support (LPS) should be considered with adequate monitoring for signs of OHSS. Decision making based on patient characteristics, monitoring techniques, clinical experience, laboratory outcomes, and recent evidence is the key to maintain a balance between incidence and severity of OHSS and IVF cycle outcomes in terms of successful healthy pregnancy.

Keywords

GnRH agonistGnRH antagonistFrozen-thawed embryo replacement cycleAgonist triggeringIn vitro fertilization (IVF)Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

37.1 Introduction

OHSS is the most serious iatrogenic complication of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Though use of exogenous gonadotropins for COS/IVF is the main cause, other agents such as clomiphene and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs are also responsible in occasional cases. Mild OHSS accounts for up to 33 % of IVF cycles, with the reported incidence of 3 to 6 % for moderate and 0.1 % and 2 % for severe OHSS [2].

Severe OHSS may be complicated by thromboembolism, pleural and pericardial effusion, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), renal failure, liver dysfunction, or even multiorgan failure. Very few cases of OHSS-related mortality have been reported in the literature [35]. In a survey on maternal deaths related to IVF in the Netherlands, 3 deaths per 100,000 IVF cycles were reported [6].

37.2 Pathophysiology of OHSS

OHSS involves marked ovarian enlargement, theca lutein cysts, and increased vascular permeability leading to acute fluid shift from intravascular to extravascular space and its sequelae (Fig. 37.1). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a vasoactive cytokine, plays a pivotal role in pathophysiology of OHSS [78].

A319836_1_En_37_Fig1_HTML.gif

Fig. 37.1

Pathogenesis of OHSS

Numerous factors acting directly or indirectly via VEGF, including interleukins, cytokines, angiotensin II, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), etc. may be involved [911]. Some studies showed a direct correlation between plasma renin activity and the severity of OHSS [12], but it could probably be the effect and not the cause of OHSS [13]. Mutation of FSH receptor gene may also predispose to OHSS because of abnormally high sensitivity to hCG [14].

The classification of OHSS is beyond the scope of this chapter, but can be found in other sources [1516].

37.3 OHSS Prevention: A Stepwise Strategy

37.3.1 Identification of High-Risk Cases

Prediction of high-risk cases prior to COS and individualized approach is the first step in the prevention of OHSS (Tables 37.1 and 37.2) [1725].

Table 37.1

Predictors of OHSS

Pretreatment characteristics

 

 Young age

<33 y

 Lean body weight

Insufficient evidence

 Polycystic ovaries on ultrasound/PCOS

 

 High basal antral follicle count (AFC)

≥12–14

 Previous episodes of OHSS or hyperresponse

 

 High anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)

Cutoff level of 3.36 ng/ml

From Humaiden et al. [17]

Table 37.2

Ovarian response parameters

High doses of exogenous gonadotropins in early follicular phase

 

High number of growing follicles

>14 follicles with diameter of 11 mm

>11 follicles with diameter of 10 mm

High serum estradiol (E2) levels

3500–6,000 pg/ml (better applicable in combination of growing follicles)

Rapidly rising serum E2 levels

 

VEGF levels – in follicular fluid

 

Number of oocytes retrieved

>15–20

Higher and/or repeated dose of exogenous hCG administration

 

Follicular fluid IL-6 and IL-8 levels on the day of embryo transfer

 

Pregnancy in fresh cycle

 

Multifetal pregnancy

 

From Humaiden et al. [17]

37.3.2 Adjustment of FSH Starting Dose

Starting with the lowest possible dose of gonadotropins and close monitoring during COS with ultrasound and serum estradiol levels reduces the risk of OHSS.

37.3.3 Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Preferably GnRH-Antagonist Protocol

Unlike GnRHa, the GnRH antagonists directly and rapidly inhibit gonadotropin release within several hours through competitive binding to the pituitary GnRH receptors [26]. GnRH-antagonist treatment protocols are effective and easy to use, allow flexibility of treatment with fewer side effects, and appear to offer a promising alternative to the long-established GnRHa regimens for prevention of a premature LH surge during COS. Flexibility of use of GnRHa as trigger for oocyte maturation is beneficial in reducing OHSS [27]. A Cochrane review in forty-five RCTs comparing the antagonist to the long agonist protocols showed significant lower incidence of OHSS in the antagonist group (29 RCTs; OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.33–0.57) without any statistically significant difference in rates of live births (9 RCTs; OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.69–1.08) [28].

37.3.4 Coasting

Coasting involves withholding the gonadotropins and postponing hCG administration until the patient’s E2 levels drop to a “safer” level [29]. Prior to the use of GnRH antagonist during COS, it had been widely used in the prevention of severe OHSS. Lower gonadotropin levels increase granulosa cell inhibition and apoptosis leading to lower levels of VEGF and other vasoactive substances involved in the pathogenesis of OHSS [30]. Daily serum E2 levels are monitored in conjunction with follicle tracking until E2 levels decrease to a safe level usually below 3000 pg/ml. A recent Cochrane review showed no evidence of difference in the incidence of moderate and severe OHSS and significantly fewer oocytes retrieved in coasting groups compared with GnRHa (OR −2.44, 95 % CI −4.30 to −0.58; P = 0.01) or no coasting (OR −3.92, 95 % CI −4.47 to −3.37; P < 0.0001. But the problem with this review was that four studies which met the inclusion criteria were different as two studies compared coasting with unilateral follicular aspiration, one compared coasting vs. no coasting, and the last study compared coasting with replacement of GnRHa with GnRH antagonist [31]. There is a high risk of cycle cancelation with coasting especially if it is more than 3–4 days or there is >30 % fall in E2 levels [3233].

37.3.5 Minimize Use of hCG

Both exogenous and endogenous hCG due to its long half-life and leutrotrophic activity play a key role in the pathophysiology of OHSS [34]. Therefore, decreasing dose of hCG for triggering oocyte maturation, replacing GnRHa for hCG trigger, and avoiding hCG in luteal phase support (LPS) are various methods to prevent delayed-onset OHSS [17].

37.3.5.1 Lowering Dose of hCG Especially in GnRHa Protocol

In high-risk cases, the lowest effective dose of hCG has been proposed, ranging from 5,000 to 2,500 IU [35]. A low dose of hCG appears to reduce the incidence of OHSS but cannot eliminate it.

37.3.5.2 GnRHa Trigger

The role of GnRHa trigger (0.2 mg triptorelin, 0.5 mg buserelin, or 1 mg leuprolide) in elimination of OHSS in high-risk patients was first suggested in 1988 [36]. GnRHa-induced surge of gonadotropins consists of 24–36 h span with resemblance to physiological mid-cycle LH surge [37]. This is in contrast to hCG-mediated LH surge which spans several days because of its long half-life leading to prolonged levels in circulation. GnRHa can replace hCG trigger in antagonist- or gonadotropin-only stimulated cycles but not in previous downregulation cycles with long-term agonist treatment [38]. In the oocyte donation model studies, avoidance of hCG exposure has been associated with complete elimination of OHSS, while recipient pregnancy rates are equivalent to those observed with hCG triggering [3940]. GnRHa trigger is the method of choice in oocyte donors and patients for fertility preservation. A recent Cochrane review of 11 RCTs reported no OHSS events in the GnRHa arm of the study and also concluded that GnRHa should not be routinely used to trigger oocyte maturation due to lower live birth rates and ongoing pregnancy rates, but makes an exception for women at high risk of OHSS, after appropriate counseling. It also concluded that combining GnRHa with embryo vitrification has the potential to provide a good clinical outcome [41]. In an analysis by Humaidan et al. comparing nine RCTs with fresh IVF cycles, no OHSS was reported after GnRHa triggering. Additionally, the delivery rate improved significantly after modified luteal support [6 % risk difference in favor of the hCG group (95 % CI: 20.14–0.2)] when compared with initial studies with conventional luteal phase support (LPS) [18 % risk difference (95 % CI: 20.36–0.01)]. They also reported 0 % incidence of OHSS in oocyte donation cycles (four RCTs). They concluded that GnRHa triggering with modified LPS is a valid alternative to hCG triggering, resulting in an elimination of OHSS [27]. Regarding the LPS after GnRHa triggering in fresh transfers, the majority of studies support supplementation with LH activity in addition to standard LPS with estradiol and progesterone [42]. Some studies showed beneficial effect of intensive LPS with intramuscular progesterone and estradiol patches as well as oral estradiol, but others showed lower pregnancy rates with similar LPS [4345]. With the dual trigger – agonist followed by hCG (1000–2500 IU) and standard LPS – comparable reproductive outcome with no increased risk of OHSS is reported [4446]. Recombinant LH after GnRHa trigger for LPS has also been tried with similar implantation rates as compared to standard luteal progesterone protocol and no cases of OHSS [47].

37.3.6 Deciding Fate of the Stimulation Cycle

37.3.6.1 Cycle Cancelation

Termination of cycle by canceling further stimulation and trigger helps in the prevention of OHSS and associated morbidity. But due to the financial burden and psychological impact on dropout patients, it should only be reserved as a last resort for severe OHSS cases or in cases of total loss of cycle control.

37.3.6.2 Cryopreservation of Oocytes and Embryos

Embryo implantation and positive pregnancy can lead to late-onset OHSS or exacerbation of early OHSS. Therefore, cryopreservation of embryos or oocyte can be an option in the prevention of OHSS. Due to improvement in freezing techniques and culture media, pregnancy rates in the frozen cycles are comparable to the fresh cycles [48].

37.3.6.3 Fresh Cycle with Single Embryo Transfer (SET)

In case of decision of fresh embryo transfer, SET is preferred to decrease chance of multiple pregnancy and associated OHSS especially in younger patient. Adoption of strategies such as blastocyst transfer may permit more time for evaluation and decision regarding cryopreservation in case of aggravation of symptoms.

37.3.7 Other Preventive Regimens for OHSS

37.3.7.1 Intravenous Fluid at the Time of Oocyte Retrieval

Albumin is known to increase the plasma oncotic pressure and decrease the capillary permeability by binding to molecules like VEGF. The role of intravenous human albumin infusion at the time of oocyte retrieval for the prevention of OHSS is controversial [4950]. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis showed a borderline statistically significant decrease in the incidence of severe OHSS with administration of human albumin (eight RCTs, OR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.45–0.99). But with administration of hydroxyethyl starch, a plasma expander, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of severe OHSS (three RCTs, OR 0.12, 95 % CI 0.04–0.40), without any effect on the pregnancy rates [51].

37.3.7.2 Dopamine Agonist

Cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, binds to VEGF receptor-2 and inhibits its phosphorylation leading to decrease in capillary permeability [5253]. Oral cabergoline 0.5 mg/day can be administered for at least 8 days in high-risk patients to prevent early OHSS. Cabergoline may reduce the risk of OHSS in high-risk women, especially moderate OHSS. It is unlikely to have a clinically relevant negative impact on clinical pregnancy or on the number of retrieved oocytes [54]. However, impact on live birth, miscarriage, and congenital abnormalities is still uncertain [55]. More recently, quinagolide has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of OHSS [56].

37.3.7.3 Insulin-Sensitizing Agents: Metformin

Insulin is known to stimulate VEGF protein expression and secretion. Metformin improves insulin sensitivity and reduction of hyperinsulinemia and decreases OHSS. In a Cochrane review on efficacy of metformin treatment in women with PCOS undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles, there was a significant reduction in the risk of OHSS (5.7 % vs. 21.2 %) [5758].

37.3.8 Additional Preventive Measures with Limited Evidence

37.3.8.1 In Vitro Maturation of Oocytes (IVM)

In patients with PCOS and in normoovulatory patients at high risk of developing OHSS, IVM of oocytes offers great potential for OHSS prevention. Due to technical difficulties in oocyte retrieval, lower success rate, and reports of high rates of meiotic spindle and chromosomal abnormalities, its practice is limited to very few centers [5960].

37.3.8.2 Glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids are a vasodilator, are an anti-inflammatory, and have inhibitory effect on VEGF gene expression [6162]. But sparse evidence and side effects limit its use in the prevention of OHSS.

37.3.8.3 Follicular Aspiration

Timed aspiration of granulosa cells from one ovary prior to hCG administration reduces the production of OHSS mediators while allowing continued contralateral ovarian development [63]. It is not recommended because of cost, invasive procedure, and limited evidence.

37.3.8.4 Aromatase Inhibitors

Luteal phase estradiol suppression by letrozole is suggested with very limited evidence [6465].

37.3.8.5 Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

Low-dose aspirin beginning on the first day of COS has shown to decrease OHSS incidence (0.25 % vs.8.4 %) in a high-risk group [66]. Meloxicam was capable of reducing the OHSS-associated ovarian weight and expression of VEGF in an animal model [67].

37.3.8.6 GnRH-Antagonist Salvage

Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist administration in patients with established severe early OHSS appears to prevent patient hospitalization and results in quick regression of the syndrome [68]. Decision of concomitant administration with embryo transfer requires more studies [69].

37.4 Segmentation for OHSS-Free Clinic by Freeze-All Policy

As stated by Devroey, the strategy to obtain an OHSS-free clinic is closely related to the segmentation concept (Fig. 37.2) [1]. With the advent of vitrification techniques, there has been a major improvement in the embryo survival and subsequent pregnancy rates [7071]. For couples who do not desire embryo cryopreservation, oocyte vitrification is another option. In a proof-of-concept study by Greisinger et al., 20 high-risk patients (≥20 follicles of ≥10 mm or estradiol ≥4000 pg/ml on trigger day) with GnRHa trigger and cryopreservation of all two pronucleate oocytes reported no case of OHSS and 29.2 % ongoing pregnancy rate in subsequent thaw cycle [3872]. Excellent embryo or oocyte survival rates after vitrification support the use of cryopreservation as a routine approach [70]

A319836_1_En_37_Fig2_HTML.gif

Fig. 37.2

Segmentation of IVF

Advantages of segmentation:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

37.5 Various Proposals for Decision Making Between Fresh Embryo Transfer or Freeze-All Policy

Although the use of a GnRH-agonist trigger can dramatically reduce the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients, for some patients segmentation of the cycle would still be better option. At present, the optimal threshold for performing a freeze-all after a GnRH-agonist trigger is not clear. Following are the various proposals by different studies (Fig. 37.3):

A319836_1_En_37_Fig3_HTML.gif

Fig. 37.3

Stepwise approach to be individualized and combined to reach the goal of eliminating OHSS

1.

2.

3.

37.6 Investigation and Monitoring of an OHSS Patient

37.6.1 General Condition

General condition is monitored by regular charting of vital signs, weight charts, abdominal girth measurement, and a strict fluid balance record.

37.6.2 Biochemical Tests

A complete biochemical assessment includes hematocrit, electrolytes, liver function tests, kidney function tests, and coagulation profile. Blood gases and acid-base balance are required if there is a respiratory or renal compromise. Serum β-hCG is done to rule out pregnancy. Serum and urinary osmolarity and urinary electrolytes may be needed in more severe forms of the disease. The frequency of these tests is guided by the severity of the disease.

37.6.3 Ultrasonographic Examination

Ultrasound gives important information on ovarian size, amount of ascites, presence of hydrothorax or pericardial effusion, and detection of pregnancy, whether single or multiple.

37.6.4 Chest X-Ray

A chest X-ray can rule out pleural effusion.

37.6.5 Serum ß-hCG

It is done to confirm pregnancy making the women at a high risk for developing severe disease.

37.6.6 Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring

When OHSS becomes critical, monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure and central venous pressure may be required.

37.7 Treatment

The condition usually resolves within 10–14 days. Treatment is based on severity of the disease.

37.7.1 Mild OHSS

In mild cases, the treatment is usually conservative and is done at outpatient level with close follow-up. Plenty of fluids is advised. She is advised to avoid exertion and counseled on the warning signs like nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain or distension, and decreased urinary output. Serum electrolytes, hematocrit, and ultrasonography should be done. Analgesics and antiemetics may be used if required. Intake-output monitoring is important.

Drug therapy may be started in an established case.

GnRH antagonists: If given on day 6 after oocyte retrieval in women with OHSS for 4 days, combined with luteal phase support using exogenous estradiol and progesterone, OHSS regressed [69]. In women on antagonist regime, antagonist administration was re-initiated if OHSS developed and continued daily for a week, while all embryos were cryopreserved.

Role of GnRH agonists: This resolved the OHSS. A marked decrease of hematocrit, white blood cell count, ovarian volume, and ascitic fluid has been observed during one week of follow-up [68].

Cabergoline: Cabergoline is given as 0.5 mg/day. It reduces hemoconcentration and ascites in hyperstimulated women undergoing assisted reproduction [79].

37.7.1.1 Reassessment

Reassessment is required if there is increase in weight more than 2 kg or worsening of symptoms.

37.7.1.2 Indication of Hospitalization

Hospitalization should be considered in all severe and critical cases of the disease or if condition worsens. In cases of mild to moderate OHSS, admission is required if a woman is not responding to treatment and if there is intolerable nausea and vomiting, hypotension, signs of pleural effusion or ascites, a hematocrit of more than 48 %, potassium level more than 5.0 mg/l, and serum creatinine more than 1.2 mg.

37.7.2 Severe OHSS

The aim of therapy is correction of circulatory volume, electrolyte imbalance, maintenance of renal function, and prevention of thrombosis.

37.7.2.1 Maintenance of Intravascular Volume and Electrolyte Imbalance

The aim must be to restore normal intravascular volume and preserve adequate renal function. Colloid expander may be used for this purpose, but they have the disadvantage that after a short while, they redistribute into the extravascular space worsening the ascites. Low-salt albumin is the expander of choice and is given in a dose of 50–100 g every 2–12 h. It reverses hematocrit changes, improves renal function, and is safe from viral contamination. Other options tried are mannitol, dextran, and fresh frozen plasma. Dextran can cause ARDS. Only if there is hyponatremia, normal saline with or without glucose is the crystalloid used for replacement. Up to 1.5–3 l may be needed. Other electrolyte imbalances like hyperkalemia are corrected.

37.7.2.2 Prevention of Thrombosis

Low-dose heparin should be given, as prophylaxis, in cases where there is an altered coagulation profile.

37.7.2.3 Dopamine

Dopamine may help to avoid fluid and salt retention by improving the renal blood flow in oliguric patient.

37.7.2.4 Management of Ascites and Hydrothorax

Paracentesis under ultrasound guidance is done where there is severe discomfort and compromise of venous return leading to a decreased cardiac output and hypotension, renal compromise, respiratory distress, or hemoconcentration unresponsive to medical therapy. Repeat aspiration may be required. This should be done if dyspnea is present because of severe pleural effusion.

37.7.3 Critical OHSS

Critical OHSS causes multisystem failure and requires multidisciplinary intensive care. Renal failure may need to be treated with dopamine, central venous pressure line, and hemodialysis. In case of pulmonary complications, arterial blood gas monitoring, thoracocentesis, or assisted ventilation is required if they do not respond to basic treatment. Patients with thromboembolic episodes require therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin. Laparotomy is required if the cysts undergo torsion, hemorrhage, or rupture. Laparoscopic unwinding can be done in cases of torsion.

Termination of pregnancy: If critical condition does not improve, one may consider termination of pregnancy.

37.8 Conclusions

GnRH-agonist trigger with antagonist cycle and freeze-all or fresh transfer with intensive LPS will help in achieving the goal toward elimination of OHSS without compromising pregnancy outcome. The optimal LPS, mode of administration, and length after COH still need to be determined. Currently, the ideal strategy that will eliminate OHSS without compromising ART outcome seems to be cycle segmentation and freezing of all embryos. Continuation of GnRH antagonists for a few days will rapidly regress the ovarian size, and transfer of embryos in subsequent natural cycles will give the best pregnancy outcomes. OHSS-related morbidity and mortality can be reduced by appropriate preventive measures, timely detection of OHSS, and management based on the severity of OHSS.

References

1.

Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2593–7.CrossRefPubMed

2.

Serour G, Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Sattar M, Amin Y, Aboulghar H. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3,500 cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(4):638–42.CrossRefPubMed

3.

Cluroe AD, Synek BJ. A fatal case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with cerebral infarction. Pathology. 1995;27(4):334–46.CrossRef

4.

Semba S, Moriya T, Youssef EM, Sasano H. An autopsy case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with massive pulmonary edema and pleural effusion. Pathol Int. 2000;50(7):549–52.CrossRefPubMed

5.

Fineschi V, Neri M, Di Donato S, Pomara C, Riezzo I, Turillazzi E. An immunohistochemical study in a fatality due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Int J Legal Med. 2006;120(5):293–9.CrossRefPubMed

6.

Braat D, Schutte J, Bernardus R, Mooij T, van Leeuwen F. Maternal death related to IVF in the Netherlands 1984–2008. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(7):1782–6.CrossRefPubMed

7.

Pietrowski D, Szabo L, Sator M, Just A, Egarter C. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is correlated with a reduction of soluble VEGF receptor protein level and a higher amount of VEGF-A. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):196–9.CrossRefPubMed

8.

Wang T, Horng S, Chang C, Wu H, Tsai Y, Wang H, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin-induced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is associated with up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3300–8.CrossRefPubMed

9.

Whelan III J, Vlahos N. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):883–96.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrinol Rev. 1997;18(1):4–25.CrossRef

11.

Abramov Y, Schenker J, Lewin A, Friedler S, Nisman B, Barak V. Endocrinology: plasma inflammatory cytokines correlate to the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(7):1381–6.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Navot D, Margalioth E, Laufer N, Birkenfeld A, Relou A, Rosler A, et al. Direct correlation between plasma renin activity and severity of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1987;48(1):57–61.PubMed

13.

Manno M, Tomei F. Renin-angiotensin system activation during severe OHSS: cause or effect? Authors’ reply. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):488.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rizk B. Genetics of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):14–27.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Mathur RS, Akande AV, Keay SD, Hunt LP, Jenkins JM. Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):901–7.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mathur R, Kailasam C, Jenkins J. Review of the evidence base strategies to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Fertil. 2007;10(2):75–85.CrossRef

17.

Humaidan P, Quartarolo J, Papanikolaou E. Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):38–400.CrossRef

18.

Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, Wu YL, Shih YT, Ho HN, et al. Serum anti-mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:160–7.CrossRefPubMed

19.

North American Ganirelix Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:38–45.CrossRef

20.

European Orgalutran Study Group. Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1490–8.CrossRef

21.

Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Fatemi HM, et al. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):112–20.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Morris RS, Wong IL, Kirkman E, Gentschein E, Paulson RJ. Inhibition of ovarian-derived prorenin to angiotensin cascade in the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1355–8.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Asch RH, Li HP, Balmaceda JP, Weckstein LN, Stone SC. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high risk groups. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(10):1395–9.PubMed

24.

Steward R, Lan L, Shah A, Yeh J, Price T, Goldfarb J, et al. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:967–73.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Chen C, Chen H, Lu H, Chen S, Ho H, Yang Y. Value of serum and follicular fluid cytokine profile in the prediction of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1037–42.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Halmos G, Schally A. Changes in subcellular distribution of pituitary receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) after treatment with the LH-RH antagonist cetrorelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(2):961–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

27.

Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou E. GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):510–24.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Al-Inany H, Youssef M, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, Abou-Setta AM. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(5):CD001750.

29.

Nardo L, Cheema P, Gelbaya T, Horne G, Fitzgerald C, Pease E, et al. The optimal length of ‘coasting protocol’ in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization. Hum Fertil. 2006;9(3):175–80.CrossRef

30.

García-Velasco JA, Zuniga A, Pacheco A, Gomez R, Simon C, Remohi J, et al. Coasting acts through downregulation of VEGF gene expression and protein secretion. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1530–8.CrossRefPubMed

31.

D’Angelo A, Brown J, Amso N. Coasting (withholding gonadotrophins) for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6):CD002811.

32.

Levinsohn-Tavor O, Friedler S, Schachter M, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Ron-El R. Coasting—what is the best formula? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):937–40.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G, Amin Y, Abou-Setta A. Criteria of a successful coasting protocol for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3167–72.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Chen D, Burmeister L, Goldschlag D, Rosenwaks Z. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: strategies for prevention. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kolibianakis E, Papanikolaou E, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Triggering final oocyte maturation using different doses of human chorionic gonadotropin: a randomized pilot study in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1382–8.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Itskovitz J, Boldes R, Barlev A, Erlik Y, Kahana L, Brandes JM. The induction of LH surge and oocyte maturation by GnRH analogue (buserelin) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1988;2 Suppl 2:165.

37.

Itskovitz J, Boldes R, Levron J, Erlik Y, Kahana L, Brandes JM. Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(2):213–20.PubMed

38.

Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a “freeze-all” strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2029–33.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Galindo A, Bodri D, Guillén JJ, Colodrón M, Vernaeve V, Coll O. Triggering with HCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist treated oocyte donation cycles: a randomised clinical trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Melo M, Busso C, Bellver J, Alama P, Garrido N, Meseguer M, et al. GnRH agonist versus recombinant HCG in an oocyte donation programme: a randomized, prospective, controlled, assessor-blind study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(4):486–92.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Youssef M, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany H, Griesinger G, Mochtar M, Aboulfoutouh I, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD008046.

42.

Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Devroey P, Kolibianakis E. GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(2):159–68.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):84–91.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Shapiro B, Daneshmand ST, Garner F, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Comparison of “triggers” using leuprolide acetate alone or in combination with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2715–7.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Orvieto R. Intensive luteal-phase support with oestradiol and progesterone after GnRH-agonist triggering: does it help? Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(5):680–1.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Humaidan P, Ejdrup Bredkjaer H, Westergaard L, Yding AC. 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin administered at oocyte retrieval rescues the luteal phase when gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used for ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(3):847–54.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Papanikolaou EG, Verpoest W, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P, Tournaye H. A novel method of luteal supplementation with recombinant LH, when a GnRH-Agonist is used instead of HCG for ovulation triggering: a randomized prospective proof of concept study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1174–7.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2008 assisted reproductive technology success rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. p. 2010.

49.

Shoham Z, Weissman A, Barash A, Borenstein R, Schachter M, Insler V. Intravenous albumin for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in an in vitro fertilization program: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(1):137–42.PubMed

50.

Bellver J, Muñoz E, Ballesteros A, Soares S, Bosch E, Simón C, et al. Intravenous albumin does not prevent moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk IVF patients: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2283–8.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Youssef M, Al-Inany H, Evers J, Aboulghar M. Intra-venous fluids for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD001302.

52.

Gomez R, Gonzalez-Izquierdo M, Zimmermann R, Novella-Maestre E, Alonso-Muriel I, Sanchez-Criado J, et al. Low-dose dopamine agonist administration blocks vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated vascular hyperpermeability without altering VEGF receptor 2-dependent luteal angiogenesis in a rat ovarian hyperstimulation model. Endocrinology. 2006;147(11):5400–11.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Soares SR, Gómez R, Simón C, García-Velasco JA, Pellicer A. Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):321–33.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Tang H, Hunter T, Hu Y, Zhai S, Sheng X, Hart R. Cabergoline for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(2):CD008605.

55.

Leitao V, Moroni R, Seko L, Nastri C, Martins W. Cabergoline for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):664–75.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Busso C, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Garcia-Velasco JA, Landeras J, et al. The non-ergot derived dopamine agonist quinagolide in prevention of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in IVF patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):995–1004.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

57.

Tso L, Costello M, Albuquerque L, Andriolo R, Freitas V. Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD006105.

58.

Moll E, van der Veen F, van Wely M. The role of metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6):527–37.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Lanzendorf S. Developmental potential of in vitro–and in vivo–matured human oocytes collected from stimulated and unstimulated ovaries. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):836–7.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Imesch P, Scheiner D, Xie M, Fink D, Macas E, Dubey R, et al. Developmental potential of human oocytes matured in vitro followed by vitrification and activation. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

61.

Nauck M, Karakiulakis G, Perruchoud A, Papakonstantinou E, Roth M. Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;341(2):309–15.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Perretti M, Ahluwalia A. The microcirculation and inflammation: site of action for glucocorticoids. Microcirculation. 2000;7(3):147–61.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Gonen Y, Powell W, Casper R. Effect of follicular aspiration on hormonal parameters in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(3):356–8.PubMed

64.

Garcia-Velasco J, Quea G, Piro M, Mayoral M, Ruiz M, Toribio M, et al. Letrozole administration during the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation impacts corpus luteum function: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):222–5.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Fatemi H, Popovic-Todorovic B, Donoso P, Papanikolaou E, Smitz J, Devroey P. Luteal phase oestradiol suppression by letrozole: a pilot study in oocyte donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(3):307–11.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Varnagy A, Bodis J, Manfai Z, Wilhelm F, Busznyak C, Koppan M. Low-dose aspirin therapy to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2281–4.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Quintana R, Kopcow L, Marconi G, Young E, Yovanovich C, Paz DA. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by meloxicam decreases the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a rat model. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4):1511–6.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Lainas T, Sfontouris I, Zorzovilis I, Petsas G, Lainas G, Kolibianakis E. Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by re-initiation of GnRH antagonist. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(4):408–12.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Lainas T, Sfontouris I, Zorzovilis I, Petsas G, Lainas G, Alexopoulou E, et al. Live births after management of severe OHSS by GnRH antagonist administration in the luteal phase. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(6):789–95.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Selman H, Brusco G, Fiorini F, Barnocchi N, Mariani M, El-Danasouri I. Vitrification is a highly efficient method to cryopreserve human embryos in in vitro fertilization patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1611–3.CrossRefPubMed

71.

AbdelHafez F, Desai N, Abou-Setta A, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(2):209–22.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Griesinger G, Von Otte S, Schroer A, Ludwig A, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, et al. Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(5):1348–52.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):835–42.

74.

Griffin D, Benadiva C, Kummer N, Budinetz T, Nulsen J, Engmann L. Dual trigger of oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin to optimize live birth rates in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1316–20.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Orvieto R. Can we eliminate severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):320–2.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Orvieto R. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome – an optimal solution for an unresolved enigma. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):77.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

77.

Kol S, Humaidan P. GnRH agonist triggering: recent developments. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(3):226–30.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Humaidan P, Polyzos N, Alsbjerg B, Erb K, Mikkelsen A, Elbaek H, et al. GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2511–21.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Alvarez C, Martí-Bonmatí L, Novella-Maestre E, Sanz R, Gómez R, Fernández-Sánchez M, et al. Dopamine agonist cabergoline reduces hemoconcentration and ascites in hyperstimulated women undergoing assisted reproduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):2931–7.CrossRefPubMed