Williams Obstetrics, 24th Edition

CHAPTER 63. Neoplastic Disorders

PRINCIPLES OF CANCER THERAPY RELATED TO PREGNANCY

REPRODUCTIVE TRACT NEOPLASMS

BREAST CARCINOMA

THYROID CANCER

LYMPHOID CELL MALIGNANCIES

MALIGNANT MELANOMA

GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT CANCER

MISCELLANEOUS TUMORS

Neoplasms are commonly found in pregnant women. Although most are benign, if a malignancy complicates pregnancy, then usual management schemes become problematic. Uterine leiomyomas and ovarian cysts are the most frequently encountered benign neoplasms during pregnancy. Malignancies have an incidence of approximately 1 per 1000 pregnancies (Brewer, 2011). One third are diagnosed prenatally and the others within 12 months of delivery. Some of the more common cancers found in pregnant women are shown in Figure 63-1. Of these, the three most common are breast—1 per 5000 pregnancies, thyroid—1 per 7000, and cervical—1 per 8500 (Smith, 2003). These, along with lymphoma and melanoma, account for 65 percent of cancer cases in pregnancy (Eibye, 2013).

image

FIGURE 63-1 Proportion of malignancies during pregnancy and within 12 months of delivery in 4.85 million women from the California Cancer Registry. GI = gastrointestinal. (Data from Smith, 2003.)

PRINCIPLES OF CANCER THERAPY RELATED TO PREGNANCY

Management of the pregnant woman with cancer poses unique problems related to fetal concerns. Because of these, treatment must be individualized. Considerations include the type and stage of cancer and the desire for pregnancy continuation with the inherent risks associated with modifying or delaying treatment.

image Surgery

Operative procedures indicated for cancer include those for diagnosis, staging, or therapy. Fortunately, most procedures that do not interfere with the reproductive tract are well tolerated by both mother and fetus (Chap. 46p. 927). Although many procedures have classically been deferred until after 12 to 14 weeks’ gestation to minimize abortion risks, this probably is not necessary. We are of the opinion that surgery should be performed regardless of gestational age if maternal well-being is imperiled.

Both pregnancy and malignancy are risk factors for venous thromboembolism. There are no guidelines specific for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women undergoing surgical procedures for cancer. Thus, depending on the complexity of the planned procedure, it seems reasonable to use mechanical prophylaxis compression or pneumatic stockings, low-molecular-weight heparin, or both (Chap. 52p. 1044). There are general evidenced-based practice guidelines available from the American College of Chest Physicians (Guyatt, 2012).

image Diagnostic Imaging

Sonography is a preferred imaging tool during pregnancy when appropriate. In addition, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009), most diagnostic radiographic procedures have very low x-ray exposure and should not be delayed if they would directly affect therapy (Chap. 46p. 932). Computed tomography is useful for imaging extraabdominal tumors, and abdominal shielding usually helps to decrease fetal exposure. Routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging use is not recommended, and if needed, is used preferentially after the first trimester. Gadolinium contrast administered with MR imaging crosses the placenta, resulting in high fetal concentrations. It should not be used in the first trimester and should be used later in pregnancy only when the benefits overwhelmingly outweigh the risks (Kanal, 2007). Some radioisotopes are relatively safe, but positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is usually not performed during pregnancy. Moreover, 18F-FDG (fludeoxyglucose) is concentrated in both breast tissue and milk. Thus, in the puerperium, breast feeding should be discontinued for 72 hours following a procedure (Rizack, 2009).

image Radiation Therapy

Therapeutic radiation often results in significant fetal exposure depending on the dose, tumor location, and field size. The most susceptible period is organogenesis, although there is no gestational age considered safe for therapeutic radiation exposure. Adverse effects include cell death, carcinogenesis, and mutagenic changes in future generations (Brent, 1999; Hall, 1991). Characteristic fetal effects are microcephaly and mental retardation, and even late exposure can cause growth restriction and brain damage. Thus, radiotherapy to the maternal abdomen is contraindicated. With some head and neck cancers, however, radiotherapy to supradiaphragmatic areas can be used relatively safely with abdominal shielding. In others, such as breast cancer, significant scatter doses can accrue to the fetus.

image Chemotherapy

Various antineoplastic drugs may be given for primary treatment or for adjunctive therapy. Although chemotherapy often improves long-term maternal outcomes, many are reluctant to employ it during pregnancy. As discussed in Chapter 12 (p. 248), fetal concerns include malformations, growth restriction, mental retardation, and the risk of future malignancies. Risks are dependent primarily on fetal age at exposure, and most agents are potentially detrimental given in the first trimester during organogenesis. Indeed, embryonic exposure to cytotoxic drugs may cause major malformations in up to 20 percent of cases (Pavlidis, 2011).

After organogenesis, most antineoplastic drugs are without immediate obvious adverse sequelae (Abdel-Hady, 2012; Cardonick, 2004). Similarly, late mutagenic effects appear limited. Children born to 68 women receiving chemotherapy and who were assessed at 18 months had no excessive adverse effects to their central nervous system, heart, or hearing or to their general health or growth (Amant, 2012b).

Although not always practicable, some recommend that chemotherapy be withheld in the 3 weeks before expected delivery because neutropenia or pancytopenia might cause undue risk for maternal infection or hemorrhage. Another concern is that neonatal hepatic and renal clearance of chemotherapy metabolites is limited (Ko, 2011). For these reasons, chemotherapy is also contraindicated with breast feeding.

image Molecular Therapy

Drugs designed to stimulate hemopoiesis are commonly used with cancer treatments. Some of these include the granulocyte colony-stimulating factors filgrastim (Neupogen) and pegfilgrastim (Neulasta). If required in pregnancy, limited data support the safety of these factors (Dale, 2003). Red blood cells can be stimulated by erythropoietin alfa (Procrit), which likely is also safe in pregnancy (Briggs, 2011).

image Immunotherapy

Hybridized monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor-specific antigens are designed to treat an ever-increasing list of malignant neoplasms. Some of these drugs are described in the discussion of tumors for which they are used. Little is known regarding their fetal effects, but concerns for teratogenicity by tyrosine kinase inhibitors—for example, imatinib (Gleevec)—have been raised (Ali, 2009).

image Fertility and Pregnancy after Cancer Therapy

The number of cancer survivors continues to increase. From the Childhood Cancer Survival Study (CCSS), a fourth of survivors have significant morbidity at 25 years (Diller, 2011). One is that subsequent fertility may be diminished after chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and couples should be counseled regarding potential risks (American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2013). Guidelines for this counseling have been developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Loren, 2013).

Embryo cryopreservation is standard and widely available, however, other methods are considered investigational and limited to referral centers. Some are oocyte or ovarian cryopreservation, preradiotherapy ovarian transposition, and/or ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists before therapy. Educational materials concerning these methods have been provided by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) interdisciplinary group—the Oncofertility Consortium (Woodruff, 2010). This is available online at: http://oncofertility.northwestern.edu.

Not surprisingly, abdominopelvic radiation impairs subsequent reproductive function (Wo, 2009). Data from the CCSS are informative for women who conceive following cancer therapy. Since the database was established in 1994, 4029 pregnancies have been reported in 1953 women. A number of reports have described increased adverse pregnancy outcomes by type of cancer treatment given. For example, fetuses born to women who had undergone prior pelvic radiation were more likely to have a birthweight < 2500 g (Green, 2002; Robison, 2005). There was a higher rate of preterm birth in cancer survivors—especially those given pelvic radiotherapy—compared with their siblings (Signorello, 2006). In another study of 917 pregnancies, cancer survivors had slightly higher rates of preterm birth and postpartum hemorrhage (Clark, 2007). In yet another study of 1657 women from the CCSS, Signorello and colleagues (2010) reported that uterine or ovarian irradiation significantly increased the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death. One possible explanation for adverse reproductive effects is that radiotherapy, but not chemotherapy, at a young age irreversibly reduces the uterine volume in survivors (Larsen, 2004). Perhaps the most reassuring findings from all of these studies are that fetuses of women who were treated in childhood with radiotherapy did not have significantly increased risks for congenital malformations (Lawrenz, 2012; Winther, 2009).

image Placental Metastases

Tumors infrequently metastasize to the placenta. The most common types are malignant melanomas, leukemias, lymphomas, and breast cancer (Al-Adnani, 2007). Placentas from pregnancies in these and all other women with a malignancy should be sent for histological evaluation. Because tumor cells are usually confined within the intervillous spaces, fetal metastases are infrequent. Melanoma is the most common example, and typically fetal metastases are found in the liver or subcutaneous tissue with an 80-percent associated mortality rate (Alexander, 2003; Altman, 2003; Gottschalk, 2009).

REPRODUCTIVE TRACT NEOPLASMS

Benign neoplasms are common in the female reproductive tract and include leiomyomas, ovarian neoplasms, and endocervical polyps. Malignancies of these organs are the most frequent cancers encountered in pregnant women, and of these, cervical cancers make up the majority (Fig. 63-2).

image

FIGURE 63-2 Frequency of reproductive-tract malignancies in 844 pregnant women. (Data from Haas, 1984; Lutz, 1977; Smith, 2003.)

image Cervix

Endocervical Polyp

A number of benign, premalignant, and malignant cervical neoplasms are frequently recognized during pregnancy. Endocervical polyps are overgrowths of benign endocervical stroma covered by epithelium. If asymptomatic, these polyps are usually seen at the time of the initial pelvic examination, although they can cause bleeding at any time. They typically appear as single, red, smooth, elongated fleshy masses of variable size that extend outward from the endocervical canal. Typically benign, they can however be a source of Pap smear results describing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance—AGUS. And although malignant transformation in these growths is uncommon, polypoid cervical cancers can mimic these (Chin, 2002; Younis, 2010). Thus, most recommend their removal and evaluation. Polyps with a slender stalk are removed by grasping the tumor with ring or polyp forceps. It is then twisted repeatedly about its base to strangulate feeding vessels. With repeated twisting, the base narrows and avulses. Monsel solution, which is ferric subsulfate, can be applied with pressure to the stalk stub for hemostasis. A thick-pedicle polyp may sometimes warrant surgical excision.

Epithelial Neoplasia

Pregnancy provides an opportune time to screen for premalignant and malignant cervical epithelial neoplasia, especially in women without regular access to health care. With prenatal Pap smear screening, the pregnancy status is noted on the requisition form because interpretation may be hindered by pregnancy-associated physiological changes (Connor, 1998). Some changes include glandular epithelial hyperplasia, Arias-Stella reaction, and presence of decidual cells.

Screening guidelines also applicable in pregnant women were updated in 2012 by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP). These include: (1) no screening until age 21, (2) cytology alone every 3 years in those aged 21 to 29 years, and (3) in those older than 30, human papillomavirus (HPV) and cytology co-testing every 5 years, or cytology alone every 3 years. Importantly, these broad guidelines do not cover women in high-risk populations who may need more intensive screening. Examples include diethylstilbestrol (DES)-exposed women, cervical cancer survivors, and the immunocompromised (Saslow, 2012).

Oncogenic Human Papillomaviruses. Certain serovars of HPV are associated with high-grade intraepithelial lesions and invasive cancer. Some of these high-risk viruses—HPV types 16, 18, 31, 35, 45, 51, 52, and 56—may have an increased incidence in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women (Fife, 1996). Cotesting for such high-risk serotypes at the time of the Pap test is now incorporated into the recent screening guidelines for women 30 years and older. Cells can be collected directly into liquid-based cytology medium, namely, PreservCyt Solution of the ThinPrep Pap Test. Additionally, the cobas HPV Test and Digene HC2 HPV DNA test also allow collection into a specific collection medium if traditional cytology is performed.

HPV Vaccination. The clear link between HPV infection and cervical neoplasia has prompted development of two Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccines. These are available for girls and women aged 9 to 26 years. The quadrivalent HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (Gardasil) and the bivalent HPV-16/18 vaccine (Cervarix) decrease the incidence of high-grade dysplasia, and thus, cervical carcinoma (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012b; FUTURE II Study Group, 2007; Paavonen, 2009).

Vaccination is not recommended during pregnancy, and contraception during the series is recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010). That said, both vaccines are considered safe and are not associated with higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes if conception occurs during the series (Dana, 2009; Descamps, 2009; Garland, 2009). Completion of the series should be delayed until after delivery. Both of these inactivated vaccines can be given postpartum in a typical regimen of three doses, with injections given at 0, at 1 to 2, and at 6 months. The vaccines are safe for use in breast-feeding women.

Abnormal Cytological Results. The incidence of abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy is at least as high as that reported for nonpregnant women. Abnormal cytological findings and their suggested management according to consensus guidelines are summarized in Table 63-1. Many of these cytological abnormalities should prompt colposcopy to exclude invasive cancer. Accordingly, lesions suspicious for high-grade disease or cancer should undergo biopsy (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2013a). These may actively bleed because of hyperemia, but this can be stopped with Monsel paste and pressure, silver nitrate application, vaginal packing, or suture.

TABLE 63-1. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) Guidelines for Initial Management of Epithelial Cell Abnormalities in Pregnancy

image

Unsatisfactory colposcopic evaluation is less common during pregnancy because the transformation zone is better exposed due to cervical eversion. With unsatisfactory visualization, colposcopy is repeated in 6 to 8 weeks, during which time the squamocolumnar junction will further evert (Randall, 2009). Once satisfactory examination is possible and advanced disease is excluded, additional colposcopic and cytological examinations during pregnancy are not encouraged. After delivery, repeat cytology and colposcopy should generally be delayed for at least 6 weeks to allow reparative healing.

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Women with histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy may be allowed to deliver vaginally, with further evaluation planned after delivery. For those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, the recommended management is reevaluation postpartum. For those with CIN 2 or 3 in which invasive disease has been excluded, or with advanced pregnancy, repeat colposcopic and cytological evaluations are performed at intervals no more frequent than 12 weeks. Repeat biopsy is recommended if appearance of the lesion worsens or if cytology suggests invasive cancer. Alternatively, deferring reevaluation until at least 6 weeks postpartum is acceptable (Wright, 2007b).

Regression of CIN lesions is common during pregnancy or postpartum. In a study of 1079 pregnant women with cervical dysplasia in which biopsy correlated with colposcopic findings, 61 percent reverted to normal postpartum (Fader, 2010). In another study, Yost and colleagues (1999) reported postpartum regression in 70 percent of women with CIN 2 and CIN 3 lesions. And although 7 percent of women with CIN 2 lesions progressed to CIN 3, none progressed to invasive carcinoma. In another study of 77 women with carcinoma in situ (CIS) diagnosed during pregnancy, a third had postpartum regression, two thirds had persistent CIS, and only two women had microinvasive cancer on cone biopsy after delivery (Ackermann, 2006).

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is managed similarly to CIN 3 (Dunton, 2008). Thus, unless invasive cancer is identified, treatment of AIS is not recommended until 6 weeks postpartum (Wright, 2007b).

Cervical Conization. If invasive epithelial lesions are suspected, conization is indicated and may be done with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) or by cold knife conization. If possible, conization is avoided in pregnancy because of increased risks for abortion, membrane rupture, hemorrhage, and preterm delivery. The epithelium and underlying stroma within the endocervical canal cannot be extensively excised without the risk of membrane rupture. Residual disease is common. Of 376 conization procedures during pregnancy, Hacker and colleagues (1982) found residual neoplasia in 43 percent of subsequent specimens. In addition, nearly 10 percent of 180 pregnant women required transfusion after conization (Averette, 1970).

Women with CIN treated before pregnancy may encounter pregnancy complications. Cicatricial cervical stenosis is uncommon, but it may follow cervical trauma from conization, the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and laser surgery. Cervical stenosis almost always yields during labor. A so-called conglutinated cervix may undergo almost complete effacement without dilation, with the presenting part separated from the vagina by only a thin layer of cervical tissue. Dilatation usually promptly follows pressure with a fingertip, although manual dilatation or cruciate incisions may be required.

For decades, cold-knife conization has been associated with cervical incompetence and preterm birth. However, the relationship between preterm birth and LEEP continues to be debated, with some studies showing increased risk, but others not (Castanon, 2012; Jakobsson, 2009; Samson, 2005; Werner, 2010). An important study confounder is the increased risk of preterm birth in women with CIN compared with the general population even if they have not undergone an excisional procedure (Bruinsma, 2007; Shanbhag, 2009).

Invasive Cervical Cancer

The incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma has dramatically declined and approximates 1 in 8500 pregnancies in the United States (Pettersson, 2010; Smith, 2003). The diagnosis is confirmed with biopsies taken during colposcopy, with conization, or from a grossly abnormal lesion. Of the histological types, squamous cell carcinomas comprises 75 percent of all cervical cancers, whereas adenocarcinomas account for 20 to 25 percent. Cancers may appear as exophytic or endophytic growth; as a polypoid mass, papillary tissue, or barrel-shaped cervix; as a cervical ulceration or granular mass; or as necrotic tissue. A watery, purulent, foul, or bloody discharge may also be present. Biopsy with Tischler forceps is warranted for suspicious lesions.

Cervical cancer is staged clinically, and 70 percent of cases that are diagnosed in pregnancy are stage I (Morice, 2012). Physiological pregnancy changes may impede accurate staging, and the extent of cancer is more likely to be underestimated in pregnant women (Oto, 2007). Specifically, induration of the broad ligament base, which characterizes tumor spread beyond the cervix, may be less prominent due to cervical, paracervical, and parametrial pregnancy-induced softening. Staging is modified and typically incorporates findings from pelvic examination and from renal sonography, chest radiography, cystoscopy, proctoscopy, and perhaps cone biopsy. Although MR imaging is not formally considered for clinical staging, it can be used without gadolinium contrast, ideally after the first trimester, to ascertain disease involvement of the urinary tract and lymph nodes (Fig. 63-3).

image

FIGURE 63-3 Sagittal T-2 weighted magnetic resonance image of a gravid uterus at 32 weeks’ gestation with a large cervical carcinoma (arrows).

Management and Prognosis. Treatment of cervical cancer in pregnant women is individualized and depends on the clinical stage, fetal age, and individual desire to continue pregnancy (Hunter, 2008). Stage IA1 is termed microinvasive disease and describes lesions with deepest invasion ≤ 3 mm and widest lateral extension ≤ 7 mm (FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, 2009b). If diagnosed by cone biopsy, treatment follows guidelines similar to those for intraepithelial disease. In general, continuation of pregnancy and vaginal delivery are considered safe, and definitive therapy is reserved until 6 weeks postpartum.

Truly invasive cancer demands relatively prompt therapy. During the first half of pregnancy, immediate treatment is advised by most, but this depends on the decision whether to continue pregnancy. With diagnosis during the latter half of pregnancy, most agree that pregnancy can safely be continued not only until fetal viability is reached, but also until fetal lung maturity is attained (Greer, 1989). In two studies with a total of 40 women past 20 weeks with either stage I or stage IIA carcinoma, it was concluded that delayed treatment was reasonable in women without bulky lesions (Takushi, 2002; van Vliet, 1998). Another option is to complete staging using laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and to delay treatment if metastases are excluded (Alouini, 2008; Favero, 2010). In a recent metaanalysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum derivatives was found to be promising for treatment in pregnancy (Zagouri, 2013).

Although surgical therapy and radiation are equally effective, radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy is the preferred treatment for invasive carcinoma in most women with stage I and early stage IIA lesions (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2010a). Before 20 weeks, hysterectomy is usually performed with the fetus in situ. In later pregnancy, however, hysterotomy is often performed first. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer destroys ovarian and possibly sexual function, and frequently causes intestinal and urinary tract injury. In 49 women with pregnancy-associated stage IB cancer, there was a 30-percent severe complication rate from radiotherapy compared with only 7 percent with surgery (Nisker, 1983).

Although less commonly selected, fertility-preserving procedures for early-stage cervical cancers have been investigated. Ungár and colleagues (2006) performed abdominal radical trachelectomy before 20 weeks for stage IB1 carcinoma in five pregnant women. Yahata and associates (2008) treated four women at 16 to 23 weeks for stage IA1 adenocarcinoma with laser conization, and all delivered at term. Van Calsteren and coworkers (2008) reported similar success in a woman at 8 weeks with stage IB2 adenocarcinoma.

Radiotherapy is given for more advanced-stage cancer. External beam radiation is given for treatment early in pregnancy, and then if spontaneous abortion does not ensue, curettage is performed. During the second trimester, spontaneous abortion may not promptly occur and may necessitate hysterotomy in up to a fourth of cases.

Stage-for-stage, the survival rate for invasive cervical carcinoma is similar in pregnant and nonpregnant women (Sood, 1998). In a case-control study of 44 women with pregnancy-associated cervical cancer, the overall 5-year survival rate was approximately 80 percent in both pregnant women and nonpregnant controls (Van der Vange, 1995).

Delivery. Any adverse prognostic effects that vaginal delivery through a cancerous cervix might have are unknown. For this reason, the mode of delivery is controversial, especially for small, early-stage lesions. In some cases of bulky or friable lesions, there may be significant hemorrhage with vaginal delivery. Also, recurrences in the episiotomy scar, which result from tumor cells apparently “seeding” the episiotomy, have been reported (Goldman, 2003). Thus, most favor cesarean delivery and use a classical hysterotomy incision to avoid the risk of cutting through tumor.

Pregnancy after Radical Trachelectomy. There is growing experience with pregnancy in women who have previously undergone fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy for stage IB1 and IB2 cervical cancer before conception. During the typically vaginal procedure, the cervix is amputated at the level of the internal os, and a permanent-suture cerclage is placed around the isthmus for support in future pregnancies. The uterine isthmus is then reconstructed to the vagina. Because of the permanent cerclage, a classical cesarean incision is required for delivery.

Shepherd and colleagues (2006) presented outcomes for 123 such women cared for at their institution. Of 63 women who attempted pregnancy, 19 had 28 live births. All had classical cesarean deliveries, and a fourth were before 32 weeks. Similar findings were reported by Kim (2012) and Park (2014) and their colleagues.

image Uterus

Leiomyomas

Also known as myomas and somewhat erroneously called fibroids, uterine leiomyomas are common benign smooth muscle tumors. Their incidence during pregnancy is approximately 2 percent, and the cited range depends on the frequency of routine sonography and population characteristics (Qidwai, 2006; Stout, 2010). For example, in a study of 4271 women, Laughlin and coworkers (2009) reported that first-trimester leiomyoma prevalence was highest in black women—18 percent—and lowest in whites—8 percent.

Leiomyomas vary in location and may develop as submucous, subserosal, or intramural growths. Less frequently, these develop in the cervix or broad ligament. Some become parasitic and their blood supply is derived from adjacent structures such as the highly vascularized omentum. In the rare manifestation of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata, numerous subperitoneal benign smooth muscle tumors may appear similar to disseminated carcinomatosis. The tumors are likely caused by estrogen stimulation of multicentric subcoelomic mesenchymal cells to become smooth-muscle cells (Bulun, 2013). In their review of 45 cases, Lashgari and colleagues (1994) found that half were discovered during pregnancy. Often, these tumors regress after pregnancy.

The stimulatory effects of pregnancy on myoma growth are unpredictable and can be impressive. These tumors respond differently in individual women and may grow, regress, or remain unchanged in size during pregnancy (Laughlin, 2009; Neiger, 2006).

Especially during pregnancy, myomas can be confused with other adnexal masses, and sonographic imaging is indispensable (Fig. 63-4). In women in whom sonographic findings are unclear, MR imaging performed after the first trimester may be necessary (Torashima, 1997). Once diagnosed, leiomyomas do not require surveillance with serial sonography unless associated complications are anticipated.

image

FIGURE 63-4 Sonogram of a pregnant uterus with a large uterine leiomyoma. The heterogeneous mass (arrows) lies beside the fetus (seen in cross section) and has the classic appearance of a leiomyoma in pregnancy. The placenta is located anteriorly, and the mass originates from the posterior lower uterine segment and occupies more than half of the total uterine volume.

Symptoms. Most leiomyomas are asymptomatic, but acute or chronic pain or pressure may develop. For chronic pain secondary to large tumor size, nonnarcotic analgesic drugs may be given. More acutely, in some cases, myomas outgrow their blood supply and hemorrhagic infarction follows, which is termed red or carneous degeneration. Clinically, there is acute focal abdominal pain and tenderness, and sometimes a low-grade fever and leukocytosis is noted. As such, tumor degeneration may be difficult to differentiate from appendicitis, placental abruption, ureteral stone, or pyelonephritis. Sonographic imaging may be helpful, but close observation is requisite because an infarcted myoma is essentially a diagnosis of exclusion. In some women, preterm labor is stimulated by associated inflammation.

Treatment is analgesic medications, and most often, symptoms abate within a few days. If further treatment is given to forestall preterm labor, then close observation to exclude a septic cause is imperative. Although surgery is rarely necessary during pregnancy, myomectomy in highly selected cases has resulted in good outcomes (Celik, 2002; De Carolis, 2001). Most of 23 reported women were 14 to 20 weeks, and in almost half, surgery was performed because of pain. In some, an intramural leiomyoma was in contact with the implantation site. Except for one loss immediately following surgery at 19 weeks, most underwent cesarean delivery later at term.

Occasionally, pedunculated subserosal myomas will undergo torsion with subsequent painful necrosis. In such cases, laparoscopy or laparotomy can be used to ligate the stalk and resect the necrotic tumor. That said, we are of the opinion that surgery should be limited to tumors with a discrete pedicle that can be easily clamped and ligated.

Pregnancy Complications. Myomas are associated with a number of complications including preterm labor, placental abruption, fetal malpresentation, obstructed labor, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage (Klatsky, 2008; Qidwai, 2006; Sheiner, 2004). In a review of pregnancy outcomes in 2065 women with leiomyomas, Coronado and coworkers (2000) reported that placental abruption and breech presentation were each increased fourfold; first-trimester bleeding and dysfunctional labor, twofold; and cesarean delivery, sixfold. Salvador and associates (2002) reported an eightfold increased second-trimester abortion risk in these women but found that genetic amniocentesis did not increase this risk.

The two factors most important in determining morbidity in pregnancy are leiomyoma size and location (Shavell, 2012). The proximity of myomas to the placental implantation site is also a factor. Specifically, abortion, preterm labor, placental abruption, and postpartum hemorrhage all are increased if the placenta is adjacent to or implanted over a leiomyoma. Tumors in the cervix or lower uterine segment may obstruct labor, as did the one shown in Figure 63-5. Despite these complications, Qidwai and colleagues (2006) reported a 70-percent vaginal delivery rate in women in whom myomas were ≥ 10 cm. These data argue against empirical cesarean delivery for leiomyomas, and we allow a trial of labor unless myomas clearly obstruct the birth canal. If cesarean delivery is indicated, myomas are generally left alone unless they cause recalcitrant bleeding. An important caveat is that cesarean hysterectomy may be technically difficult because of lateral ureteral displacement by the tumors.

image

FIGURE 63-5 Cesarean delivery performed because of a large leiomyoma in the lower uterine segment. A classical vertical uterine incision, seen to the left of the myoma, was required for delivery of the fetus.

Bleeding due to myomas may develop during pregnancy from any of several factors. Especially common is bleeding with miscarriage, preterm labor, or placenta previa and abruption. Much less frequently, bleeding may result from a submucous myoma that has prolapsed from the uterus and into the cervix or vagina. In these unusual cases, although heavy or persistent bleeding may require earlier intervention, the stalk can be ligated vaginally near term if accessible to avoid tumor avulsion during delivery.

Fortunately, myomas rarely become infected (Genta, 2001). This is most frequent postpartum, especially if the tumor is located immediately adjacent to the implantation site (Lin, 2002). They also may become infected with an associated septic abortion and myoma perforation by a sound, dilator, or curette.

Fertility Considerations. Despite the relatively high prevalence of myomas in young women, it is not clear whether they diminish fertility, other than by possibly causing miscarriage as discussed in Chapter 18(p. 359). In a review of 11 studies, Pritts (2001) concluded that submucous myomas did significantly affect fertility. He also found that hysteroscopic myomectomy improved infertility and early miscarriage rates in these women. Infertility-related myomas in other locations may require laparoscopy or laparotomy for excision.

Some of these methods of treatment for infertility may affect successful pregnancies. For example, after myomectomy, there is concern for uterine rupture before and during labor (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012a). Management is individualized, and review of the prior operative report is prudent. If resection resulted in a defect into or immediately adjacent to the endometrial cavity, then cesarean delivery is usually done before labor begins.

Although less effective than surgery, uterine artery embolization of myomas has also been used to treat infertility or myoma symptoms (Mara, 2008). Women so treated have increased rates of miscarriage, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage (Homer, 2010). At this time, the Society of Interventional Radiology (Stokes, 2010) considers myoma embolization relatively contraindicated in women who plan future pregnancies.

Endometriosis and Adenomyosis

Rarely do endometriomas cause problems in pregnancy. If they are identified sonographically, they can be resected if cesarean delivery is performed. With vaginal delivery, endometriotic tumors or cysts may be removed after the puerperium or followed clinically depending on symptoms and cyst characteristics (Levine, 2010). Occasionally, endometriosis can develop after delivery from endometrial implants within abdominal incisions made at cesarean delivery or within episiotomy scars (Bumpers, 2002).

Adenomyosis is traditionally found in older women. Its acquisition may be at least partially related to disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during sharp curettage for abortion (Curtis, 2002). Although problems during pregnancy are rare, in an 80-year review, Azziz (1986) reported concurrent adenomyosis to be associated with uterine rupture, ectopic pregnancy, uterine atony, and placenta previa.

Endometrial Carcinoma

This estrogen-dependent neoplasia is usually found in women older than 40 years. Thus, it is seen only rarely with pregnancy. Hannuna and colleagues (2009) found 27 cases that were identified during pregnancy or within the first 4 months postpartum. Most were found in first-trimester curettage specimens.

These are usually early-stage well-differentiated adenocarcinomas for which treatment consists primarily of total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Much less commonly, to preserve future fertility, curettage with or without postprocedural progestational therapy has been used for the rare patient with cancer identified in a miscarriage curettage specimen (Schammel, 1998).

Many more studies describe a conservative approach for well-selected nonpregnant women diagnosed with endometrial cancer who wish to preserve fertility. In one study of 13 women treated with progestins for early-stage well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, nine had liveborn infants, and four of six women with a recurrence responded to another course of therapy (Gotlieb, 2003). Similar outcomes were described in 12 women by Niwa and associates (2005) and in 21 women by Signorelli and coworkers (2009). Despite these acceptable pregnancy rates, recurrences and death have been reported, and conservative management is not considered standard (Erkanli, 2010).

image Ovary

Ovarian masses found during pregnancy are relatively common, and the reported incidences are population- and investigation- dependent. Factors include whether studies are referral or primary care sources, the frequency of prenatal sonography, and what size constitutes a “mass.” It is thus not surprising that the incidence has been reported as 1 in 100 to 1 in 2000 pregnancies (Whitecar, 1999; Zanetta, 2003). Of ovarian malignancies, the absolute incidence in the California Cancer Registry was 1 in 19,000 pregnancies (Smith, 2003).

The most frequent types of ovarian masses are corpus luteum cysts, endometriomas, benign cystadenomas, and mature cystic teratomas, colloquially termed dermoids. Because pregnant women are usually young, malignant tumors and those of low malignant potential are proportionately uncommon and vary from 4 to 13 percent (Hoffman, 2007; Sherard, 2003). Our experiences from Parkland Hospital are similar to those reported by Leiserowitz and colleagues (2006), who found that 1 percent of 9375 ovarian masses were frankly malignant and that another 1 percent was of low malignant potential.

Most ovarian masses are asymptomatic in pregnant women. Some cause pressure or chronic pain, and acute abdominal pain may be due to torsion, rupture, or hemorrhage. Seldom is blood loss significant enough to cause hypovolemia.

Sonography

Many ovarian masses are detected during routine prenatal sonography or during imaging done for other indications, including evaluation of symptoms. The typical sonographic appearance of these masses is shown in Figure 63-6. In some instances, MR imaging can be used to evaluate complicated anatomy (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2013b).

image

FIGURE 63-6 Sonographic characteristics of common adnexal masses in pregnancy. A. A simple anechoic cyst with smooth walls is characteristic of a physiological corpus luteum cyst or benign cystadenoma. B. Cystic structure with diffuse internal low-level echoes suggestive of an endometrioma or hemorrhagic corpus luteum. C. Mature cystic teratoma appears as an adnexal cyst (marked by calipers) with accentuated lines and dots that represent hair in both longitudinal and transverse planes. At the central inferior aspect of this cyst, a mural nodule—Rokitansky protuberance—is seen. These typically rounded protuberances range in size from 1 to 4 cm, they are predominantly hyperechoic, and they create an acute angle with the cyst wall. Although not seen here, fat-fluid levels are often identified with cystic teratomas. (Image contributed by Dr. Elysia Moschos.)

Tumor Markers

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels are frequently elevated with ovarian malignancy. Importantly, concentrations in early pregnancy and early puerperium are normally elevated, possibly from the decidua (Aslam, 2000; Haga, 1986; Spitzer, 1998). From the second trimester until term, levels are not normally higher than those in the nonpregnant woman (Appendixp. 1289). Other tumor markers that have not been proven for diagnosis or posttreatment surveillance in pregnancy include OVA1, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), alpha-fetoprotein, and inhibins A and B (Liu, 2011). Of these, OVA1 is a biomarker blood test that measures five analytes, one of which is CA125.

Complications

The two most common complications of any ovarian mass are torsion and hemorrhage. Torsion usually causes acute constant or episodic lower abdominal pain that frequently is accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Sonography often aids the diagnosis. With color Doppler, presence of an ovarian mass with absent flow strongly correlates with torsion. However, minimal or early twisting may compromise only venous flow, thus leaving arterial supply intact. If torsion is suspected, laparoscopy or laparotomy is warranted. Contrary to prior teaching, adnexectomy is generally unnecessary to avoid clot release, thus, most recommend attempts at untwisting (McGovern, 1999; Zweizig, 1993). With a salvageable ovary, within minutes, congestion is relieved, and ovarian volume and cyanosis diminish. If cyanosis persists, however, then removal of the infarcted adnexa is typically indicated.

If the adnexa is healthy, there are options. First, neoplasms are resected. However, ovarian cystectomy in an ischemic, edematous ovary may be technically difficult, and adnexectomy may be necessary. Second, unilateral or bilateral oophoropexy has been described to minimize the risk of repeated torsion (Djavadian, 2004; Germain, 1996). Techniques described include shortening of the uteroovarian ligament or fixing the uteroovarian ligament to the posterior uterus, the lateral pelvic wall, or the round ligament (Fuchs, 2010; Weitzman, 2008).

The most common case of ovarian hemorrhage follows rupture of a corpus luteum cyst. If the diagnosis is certain and symptoms abate, then observation and surveillance is usually sufficient. Concern for ongoing bleeding will typically prompt surgical evaluation. If the corpus luteum is removed before 10 weeks’ gestation, progestational support is recommended to maintain the pregnancy. Suitable regimens include: (1) micronized progesterone (Prometrium) 200 or 300 mg orally once daily; (2) 8-percent progesterone vaginal gel (Crinone) one premeasured applicator vaginally daily plus micronized progesterone 100 or 200 mg orally once daily; or (3) intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, 150 mg. For the last, if given between 8 and 10 weeks’ gestation, only one injection is required immediately after surgery. If the corpus luteum is excised between 6 and 8 weeks’ gestation, then two additional doses should be given 1 and 2 weeks after the first.

Management of an Asymptomatic Adnexal Mass

Because most of these are incidental findings, management considerations include whether resection is necessary and its timing. A cystic benign-appearing mass that is < 5 cm often requires no additional antepartum surveillance. Early in pregnancy, this is likely a corpus luteum cyst, which typically resolves by the early second trimester. For cysts ≥ 10 cm, because of the substantial risk of malignancy, torsion, or labor obstruction, surgical removal is reasonable. Tumors between 5 and 10 cm should be carefully evaluated by sonography along with color Doppler and possibly MR imaging. If they have a simple cystic appearance, these cysts can be managed expectantly with sonographic surveillance (Schmeler, 2005; Zanetta, 2003). Resection is done if cysts grow, begin to display malignant qualities, or becomes symptomatic. However, if there are sonographic characteristics that suggest a cancer—thick septa, nodules, papillary excrescences, or solid components—then immediate resection is indicated (Caspi, 2000; Fleischer, 1990). Approximately 1 in 1000 pregnant women undergoes surgical exploration for an adnexal mass (Boulay, 1998). In general, we plan resection at 14 to 20 weeks because most masses that will regress will have done so by this time. Those with classic findings of endometrioma or mature cystic teratoma may be resected postpartum or during cesarean for obstetrical indications. Importantly, in any instance in which cancer is strongly suspected, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011) recommends consultation with a gynecologic oncologist.

Pregnancy-Related Ovarian Tumors

A group of adnexal masses result directly from the stimulating effects of various pregnancy hormones on ovarian stroma. These include pregnancy luteoma, hyperreactio luteinalis, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Pregnancy Luteoma. These are rare, benign, ovarian neoplasms that are thought to arise from luteinized stromal cells and that classically cause elevated testosterone levels (Irving, 2011). Up to 25 percent of affected women will be virilized, and of these affected women, approximately half of their female fetuses will have some degree of virilization. Fortunately, most mothers and their fetuses are unaffected by the hyperandrogenemia because the placenta rapidly converts androgens to estrogens (Kaňová, 2011).

In some cases, an adnexal mass along with maternal virilization will prompt sonography and measurement of testosterone and CA125 levels. Luteomas range in size from microscopic to greater than 20 cm. They appear as solid tumors, may be multiple or bilateral, and may be complex because of hemorrhagic areas (Choi, 2000). Concerns for malignancy may be further investigated by MR imaging (Kao, 2005; Tannus, 2009).

Total testosterone levels are increased, but with the caveat that levels in normal pregnancy can be substantially elevated (Appendixp. 1291). Levels of CA125 antigen tumor marker are normal with a pregnancy luteoma, and significantly elevated levels indicate another cause. Differential diagnoses are primary ovarian cancer or metastatic disease and include granulosa cell tumors, thecomas, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, Leydig cell tumors, stromal hyperthecosis, and hyperreactio luteinalis.

Generally, luteomas do not require surgical intervention unless there is torsion, rupture, or hemorrhage (Masarie, 2010). These tumors spontaneously regress during the first few months postpartum, and androgen levels drop precipitously during the first 2 weeks following delivery (Wang, 2005). Lactation may be delayed a week or so by hyperandrogenemia (Clement, 1993; Dahl, 2008). Recurrence in subsequent pregnancies is rare.

Hyperreactio Luteinalis. In this condition, one or both ovaries develop multiple large theca-lutein cysts, typically after the first trimester. Cysts are caused by luteinization of the follicular theca interna layer, and most are in response to stimulation by exceptionally high hCG levels (Russell, 2009). For this reason, they are more common with gestational trophoblastic disease, twins, fetal hydrops, and other conditions with increased placental mass. Similar to luteoma, maternal virilization develops in approximately a third of women, but there have been no reports of fetal virilization (Kaňová, 2011).

These ovarian tumors appear sonographically to have a “spoke wheel” pattern (Fig. 20-3p. 399). If the diagnosis is confident, and unless complicated by torsion or hemorrhage, surgical intervention is not required. These masses resolve after delivery.

Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. This rare event is typified by multiple ovarian follicular cysts accompanied by increased capillary permeability. It most often is a complication of ovulation-induction therapy for infertility, although it rarely may develop in an otherwise normal pregnancy. Its etiopathogenesis is thought to involve hCG stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in granulosa-lutein cells (Soares, 2008). This causes increased vascular permeability that can lead to hypovolemia with ascites, pleural or pericardial effusion, acute kidney injury, and hypercoagulability. There is a clinical spectrum with symptoms that may include abdominal distention, rapid weight gain, dyspnea, and progressive hypovolemia. Serious complications are renal dysfunction, adult respiratory distress syndrome, ovarian rupture with hemorrhage, and thromboembolism.

Although most cases of ovarian hyperstimulation are associated with in vitro fertilization, increasing hCG levels from pregnancy can worsen the syndrome (Chen, 2012). Detailed guidelines for management have been outlined by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2008). Treatment is primarily supportive with attention to maintaining vascular volume and thromboprophylaxis.

Ovarian Cancer

Malignancies of the ovary are most common in older women and are the leading cause of death in all women from genital-tract cancers (American Cancer Society, 2012). That said, the incidence of ovarian malignancy during pregnancy ranges from 1 in 20,000 to 50,000 births (Palmer, 2009; Eibye, 2013; Smith, 2003). Fortunately, 75 percent of these found in pregnancy are early-stage malignancies with a 5-year survival rate between 70 and 90 percent (Brewer, 2011). The types of malignancy are also markedly different in pregnant women compared with those in older women. In pregnant women, these are, in decreasing order of frequency, germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors, low malignant potential tumors, and last, epithelial tumors (Morice, 2012).

Pregnancy apparently does not alter the prognosis of most ovarian malignancies. Management is similar to that for nonpregnant women, with the usual proviso that it may be modified depending on gestational age. Thus, if frozen section histopathological analysis verifies malignancy, then surgical staging is done with careful inspection of all accessible peritoneal and visceral surfaces (Giuntoli, 2006; Yazigi, 1988). Peritoneal washings are taken for cytology; biopsies are taken from the diaphragmatic surface and peritoneum; omentectomy is done; and biopsies are taken from pelvic and infrarenal paraaortic lymph nodes. Depending on the uterine size, some of these components, especially lymphadenectomy, may not be technically feasible.

If there is advanced disease, bilateral adnexectomy and omentectomy will decrease most tumor burden. In early pregnancy, hysterectomy and aggressive surgical debulking procedures may be elected. In other cases, minimal debulking as described is done and the operation terminated. In some cases of aggressive or large-volume disease, chemotherapy can be given during pregnancy while awaiting pulmonary maturation. As discussed on page 1227, monitoring maternal CA125 serum levels during chemotherapy is not accurate in pregnancy (Aslam, 2000; Morice, 2012).

Adnexal Cysts

Paratubal and paroovarian cysts are either distended remnants of the paramesonephric ducts or are mesothelial inclusion cysts. Although most are ≤ 3 cm, they occasionally attain worrisome dimensions (Genadry, 1977). Their reported incidence is influenced by size, but one autopsy series in nonpregnant women cited this to be 5 percent (Dorum, 2005). The most common paramesonephric cyst is the hydatid of Morgagni, which is pedunculated and typically dangles from one of the fimbria. These cysts infrequently cause complications and are most commonly identified at the time of cesarean delivery or puerperal sterilization, at which time they can simply be drained or excised. Neoplastic paraovarian cysts are rare, histologically resemble tumors of ovarian origin, and rarely are of borderline potential or frankly malignant (Honore, 1980; Korbin, 1998).

image Vulva and Vagina

Preinvasive Disease

In young women, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) are seen more often than invasive disease and are commonly associated with HPV infection. As with cervical neoplasia, these premalignant conditions are treated after the puerperium.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cancer of the vulva or vagina is generally a malignancy of older women, and thus, these are rarely associated with pregnancy. Even so, any suspicious lesions should be biopsied. Treatment is individualized according to the clinical stage and depth of invasion. In a review of 23 cases, investigators concluded that radical surgery for stage I disease was feasible during pregnancy—including in the last trimester (Heller, 2000). We and others question the necessity of resection in late pregnancy in that definitive therapy can often be delayed because of vulvar cancer’s typical slow progression (Anderson, 2001). It appears that vaginal delivery is not contraindicated if vulvar and inguinal incisions are well healed.

Vulvar sarcoma, vulvar melanoma, and vaginal malignancies are rare in pregnancy and are the subjects of case reports (Alexander, 2004; Kuller, 1990; Matsuo, 2009).

BREAST CARCINOMA

The incidence of breast cancer is age dependent, however, because of its overall high frequency in women, it is relatively common in young women. Recall from Figure 63-1 that breast malignancies are the most frequent cancer found in pregnant women. And, as more women choose to delay childbearing, the frequency of associated breast cancer is certain to increase (Amant, 2012a). As an example, postponed childbearing was considered partially responsible for the increase in pregnancy-associated breast cancer in Sweden from 16 to 37 percent during the 40-year period from 1963 to 2002 (Andersson, 2009). Similar findings have been reported from Denmark (Eibye, 2013).

image Risk Factors

Some, but not all, studies suggest that women with a family history of breast cancer—especially those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer gene mutations—are more likely to develop breast malignancy during pregnancy (Johannsson, 1998; Shen, 1999; Wohlfahrt, 2002). However, although there is a definitely increased long-term risk with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, it may be that parity modifies this risk. Specifically, parous women older than 40 years with these mutations have a significantly lower cancer risk than nulliparas with these mutations (Andrieu, 2006; Antoniou, 2006). Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations who undergo induced abortion or those who breast feed do not have an increased risk of breast cancer (Beral, 2004; Friedman, 2006). Moreover, Jernström and associates (2004) found that breast feeding actually conveyed a protective effect against this cancer in those with BRCA1 gene mutation, but not in those with BRCA2 mutations. Of other congenital risks, it is controversial whether diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero is associated with an increased breast cancer risk (Hoover, 2011; Larson, 2006; Titus-Ernstoff, 2006).

image Diagnosis

More than 90 percent of pregnant women with breast cancer have a palpable mass, and greater than 80 percent are self-reported (Brewer, 2011). There are usually slight delays in clinical assessment, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of pregnant women with breast tumors (Berry, 1999). This can partially be attributed to increased pregnancy-induced breast tissue that obscures masses.

Evaluation of pregnant women with a breast mass should not differ from that for nonpregnant women. Thus, any suspicious breast mass should be pursued to diagnosis. Pragmatically, a palpable discrete mass can be biopsied or excised. If imaging is desirable to distinguish between a solid mass and a cystic lesion, then sonography has high sensitivity and specificity (Navrozoglou, 2008). Mammography is appropriate if indicated, and the fetal radiation risk is negligible with appropriate shielding. Fetal exposure is only 0.04 mGy for the typical mammogram study. But, because breast tissue is denser in pregnancy, mammography has a false-negative rate of 35 to 40 percent (Woo, 2003). If the decision to biopsy is uncertain, then MR imaging may be used (Amant, 2010). With such techniques, masses can usually be described as either solid or cystic.

Cystic breast lesions are simple, complicated, or complex (Berg, 2003). Simple cysts do not require special management or monitoring, but they may be aspirated if symptomatic. Complicated cysts show internal echoes during sonography, and they sometimes are indistinguishable from solid masses. These are typically aspirated, and if the sonographic abnormality does not resolve completely, a core-needle biopsy is usually performed. Complex cysts have septa or intracystic masses seen on sonographic evaluation. Because some forms of breast cancer may be complex cysts, excision is usually recommended.

For solid breast masses, evaluation is with the triple test, that is, clinical examination, imaging, and needle biopsy. If all three suggest a benign lesion or if all three suggest a breast cancer, the test is said to be concordant. A concordant benign triple test is > 99-percent accurate, and breast lumps in this category can be followed by clinical examination alone. Fortunately, most masses in pregnancy have these three reassuring features. To the contrary, however, if any of the three assessments is suggestive of malignancy, then the mass should be excised regardless of the other two findings.

image Management

Once breast cancer is diagnosed, a limited search of the most common metastatic sites is completed. For most women, this includes a chest radiograph, liver sonography, and skeletal MR imaging (Amant, 2012a).

Treatment of breast cancer is by a multidisciplinary team that includes an obstetrician, surgeon, and medical oncologist. Desires for pregnancy continuation are addressed up front. Data indicate that pregnancy interruption does not influence the course or prognosis of breast cancer (Cardonick, 2010). With pregnancy continuation, treatment in general is similar to that for nonpregnant women. However, chemotherapy and surgery are delayed to the second trimester, and adjuvant radiotherapy is withheld until after delivery (Brewer, 2011).

Surgical treatment may be definitive. In the absence of metastatic disease, either a wide excision or a modified or total mastectomy—each with axillary node staging—can be performed (Rosenkranz, 2006; Woo, 2003). Staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy with technetium-99m is safe. Although often administered concurrently with lymphoscintigraphy, isosulfan blue and methylene blue dyes are pregnancy class C drugs, and some recommend that they be avoided (Mondi, 2007; Spanheimer, 2009). Breast reconstruction, if desired, is typically delayed until after delivery (Viswanathan, 2011).

Chemotherapy is usually given with either positive- or negative-node breast cancers. In premenopausal women, survival is improved even if lymph nodes are cancer free. For node-positive disease, multiagent chemotherapy is begun if delivery is not anticipated within several weeks. Drug classes are alkylating agents, anthracyclines, antimetabolites, and taxanes (Lippman, 2012). Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil are currently in use (García-Manero, 2009). After the first trimester, methotrexate can be substituted for doxorubicin. If an anthracycline-based agent such as doxorubicin is used, pretherapy maternal echocardiography is performed because of associated cardiotoxicity (Brewer, 2011). In 22 pregnant women treated with modified radical mastectomy that was followed by chemotherapy in most, Berry and colleagues (1999) reported minimal fetal risks. Moreover, Hahn and coworkers (2006) reported good short-term outcomes for the offspring of 57 women treated during pregnancy with multiagent chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Immunotherapy for breast cancers has become commonplace. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a monoclonal antibody to the HER2/neu receptor, which is found in approximately a third of invasive breast cancers (Hudis, 2007). The drug is used more commonly as adjunctive therapy for early disease in HER2/neu-positive tumors but is not recommended in pregnancy (Amant, 2010). This is because HER2/neu is strongly expressed in fetal renal epithelium, and trastuzumab has been linked with miscarriage, with fetal renal failure and related oligohydramnios, and with neonatal deaths from preterm birth (Azim, 2010). For these reasons, highly effective contraception is used during and for 6 months following trastuzumab treatment. For women who conceive after only brief exposure, fetal renal effects appear to be reversible, and short-term neonatal outcomes have been normal with no congenital anomalies reported (Azim, 2012).

image Prognosis

The effects of pregnancy on the course of breast cancer and its prognosis are complex. There is no doubt that breast cancer is more aggressive in younger women, but whether it is more aggressive during pregnancy in these same women is debatable. Clinically, most studies indicate little difference in overall survival rates with pregnancy-associated breast cancer compared with similarly aged and staged nonpregnant women (Beadle, 2009). There have been other reports of worse overall survival rates with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (Rodriguez, 2008). These investigators did both conclude, however, that later disease stages are more prevalent in pregnant women.

Thus, it appears that because breast cancer is usually found at a more advanced stage in pregnant women, overall prognosis is diminished. In an earlier review, Jacob and Stringer (1990) reported that approximately 30 percent of pregnant women had stage I disease, 30 percent had stage II, and 40 percent had stages III or IV. In addition, the aggregate of studies published after 1990 indicate that up to 60 percent of pregnant women have concomitant axillary node involvement at diagnosis. And although, stage for stage, the 5-year survival rate is comparable in pregnant and nonpregnant women, the more advanced stages that are typical of pregnant women worsen their prognosis (King, 1985; Nugent, 1985; Zemlickis, 1992).

image Pregnancy Following Breast Cancer

After breast cancer treatment, chemotherapy will render some women infertile, and options for childbearing are limited (Kim, 2011). For those who became pregnant, there appear to be no adverse effects on long-term maternal survival rates (Averette, 1999; Velentgas, 1999). Moreover, a metaanalysis of 10 studies found that for women with early breast cancer, pregnancy that occurs 10 months after diagnosis may, in fact, have a survival benefit (Valachis, 2010). There are also no data indicating that lactation adversely affects the course of previously diagnosed breast cancer. Also, lactation and breast feeding are possible after conservative surgery and radiation of the treated breast (Higgins, 1994).

Recommendations for subsequent pregnancies in women successfully treated for breast malignancy are based on several factors that include consideration for the recurrence risk. Simply because recurrences are more common soon after treatment, it seems reasonable to advise a delay of 2 to 3 years for observation. Hormonal contraceptive methods are contraindicated, and a copper-containing intrauterine device is an excellent long-acting reversible method for many. Even with contraceptive failure, women who conceive do not appear to have diminished survival (Ives, 2006). It is reassuring that women who undertake pregnancy after breast cancer treatment overall have good outcomes (Langagergaard, 2006). Of particular concern is that women treated with tamoxifen are at risk for several months after its discontinuation for having an infant with congenital anomalies. This is because of its extremely long half-life, and thus delaying conception is recommended for at least 2 months after its completion (Braems, 2011).

THYROID CANCER

Various thyroid gland malignancies constitute the most common endocrine cancers. Because most of these originate within discrete nodules, their evaluation is important. This typically includes sonography and measurement of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine levels. Fine-needle aspiration is indicated for any suspicious nodule (Yazbeck, 2012).

With a diagnosis of thyroid malignancy, pregnancy termination is not necessary (Alves, 2011). Primary therapy is total thyroidectomy performed ideally during the second trimester. Postoperatively, replacement thyroxine is given to maintain serum TSH levels between 0.1 and 0.5 mIU/L (Abalovich, 2007). Most thyroid cancers are well differentiated and follow an indolent course. Thus, delayed surgical treatment does not usually alter outcome (Yazbeck, 2012). If surgical therapy is postponed until after pregnancy, thyroxine is given to suppress any growth stimulus of TSH on tumor cells (Pacini, 2012).

In some types of thyroid malignancies, primary or postoperative treatment is given with radioiodine. This is contraindicated in both pregnancy and lactation. Transplacental iodine-131 is avidly trapped by the fetal thyroid gland to cause hypothyroidism (Chap. 58p. 1149). During lactation, the breast also concentrates a substantial amount of iodide. This may pose neonatal risk due to 131I-containing milk ingestion and maternal risk from significant breast irradiation. To limit maternal exposure, a delay of 3 months between lactation and ablation will more reliably ensure complete breast involution (Sisson, 2011). Last, pregnancy should be avoided for 6 months to 1 year in women with thyroid cancer who receive 131I doses. This time ensures thyroid function stability and confirms thyroid cancer remission (Abalovich, 2007).

LYMPHOID CELL MALIGNANCIES

Hematological malignancies comprise 10 to 20 percent of cancers in pregnancy (Cohen, 2011; Eibye, 2013; Smith, 2003). Some of these present as leukemia involving bone marrow and blood. Others are solid lymphomas, which may be of B- or T-cell origin.

image Hodgkin Disease

This lymphoma is probably B-cell derived and is cytologically distinguished from other lymphomas by Reed–Sternberg cells. It is the most common malignant lymphoma in women of childbearing age. In a population-based review of approximately 4 million pregnancies, Smith and associates (2003) reported that Hodgkin lymphoma complicated only 1 in 34,000 live births. Our experiences are similar during the past 40 years at Parkland Hospital with nearly 500,000 births.

In more than 70 percent of Hodgkin disease cases, there is painless enlargement of lymph nodes above the diaphragm—the axillary, cervical, or submandibular chains. Approximately one third of patients have symptoms including fever, night sweats, malaise, weight loss, and pruritus. Diagnosis is by histological examination of involved nodes (Longo, 2012).

Staging and Treatment

The Ann Arbor staging system, shown in Table 63-2, is used for Hodgkin and other lymphomas. Recent studies have used risk categories—high, low, and very low—however, these are not succinctly defined (Armitage, 2010). Pregnancy limits the use of some radiographic studies for staging, but at minimum, chest radiography, abdominal imaging with sonography or MR imaging, and bone marrow biopsy are completed (Williams, 2001). MR imaging is excellent for evaluating thoracic and abdominal paraaortic lymph nodes (Fig. 63-7) (Brenner, 2012).

TABLE 63-2. Ann Arbor Staging System for Hodgkin and Other Lymphomas

image

image

FIGURE 63-7 Hodgkin lymphoma. Magnetic resonance imaging for staging shows an axial T2-weighted image taken from the midabdomen that demonstrates bilateral paraaortic adenopathy (arrows). Amnionic fluid (AF), fetal abdomen (F), maternal right inferior liver (L), and maternal left kidney (K) are seen. (Image contributed by Dr. Desiree Morgan.)

The current trend for nonpregnant individuals is to administer chemotherapy for all stages of Hodgkin disease. In pregnancy, for early-stage disease in the first trimester, options include observation until after 12 weeks, single-agent vinblastine until the second trimester, pregnancy termination followed by multiagent chemotherapy, or radiotherapy alone for isolated neck or axillary sites (El-Hemaidi, 2012; Rizack, 2009).

For advanced-stage disease, chemotherapy is recommended regardless of gestational age. Before 20 weeks, therapeutic abortion is a consideration, but if termination is unacceptable, then treatment with vinblastine followed by multiagent therapy in the second trimester can be used (Pereg, 2007). For most advanced-stage disease after the first trimester, cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbadine (ABVD) are given, and radiotherapy can be added postpartum (Cohen, 2011). In general, postponement of therapy until fetal maturity is achieved seems justifiable only when the diagnosis is made late in pregnancy (Shulman, 2008). Importantly, in our experiences, pregnant women with Hodgkin disease—even after they are “cured”—are inordinately susceptible to infection and sepsis. Active antineoplastic therapy increases this vulnerability.

Prognosis

The overall prognosis with Hodgkin lymphoma is good, and survival rates exceed 70 percent. Pregnancy does not adversely affect the course or survival rate of women with this lymphoma (Brenner, 2012; Pavlidis, 2002). Moreover, adverse perinatal outcomes do not appear to be increased (Langagergaard, 2008). Finally, neither chemotherapy after the first trimester nor mediastinal and neck irradiation had reported adverse fetal effects (Jacobs, 1981).

The long-term prognosis for women with Hodgkin disease is encouraging. Horning and coworkers (1981) reported that half of women resumed normal menses after chemotherapy and that there were no birth defects in 24 neonates subsequently born to these women. Long-term complications of lymphoma treatment include secondary leukemia in those treated with chemotherapy, secondary breast cancer in those treated with radiotherapy, and myocardial damage and infarction, pulmonary fibrosis, hypothyroidism, and marrow suppression (Longo, 2012).

image Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Although usually B-cell tumors, non-Hodgkin can also be T-cell or natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms. Their biology, classification, and treatment are complex (Longo, 2012; O’Gara, 2009). For example, they are associated with viral infections, and indeed, their incidence has risen sharply at least partly because 5 to 10 percent of HIV-infected persons develop lymphoma. Other associated viruses include Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis C virus, and human herpes virus 8. Some of these lymphomas are quite aggressive, and survival varies with the type of cell line involved.

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas are uncommon during pregnancy, and only approximately 100 cases have been reported (Brenner, 2012). They are staged according to the Ann Arbor system shown in Table 63-2. If diagnosed in the first trimester, pregnancy termination followed by multiagent chemotherapy is recommended for all but indolent or very early disease. These less aggressive forms may either be observed or be temporized with focal supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, with full treatment after entering the second trimester. If one of these lymphomas is diagnosed after the first trimester, chemotherapy and immunotherapy with rituximab (Rituxan) are given (Cohen, 2011; Rizack, 2009). In a report describing follow-up at 6 to 29 years in 55 individuals whose mothers were given chemotherapy during pregnancy, there were no congenital, neurological, or psychological abnormalities (Avilés, 2001). Furthermore, these exposed persons had no cancers, including leukemia.

Burkitt lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell tumor associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Prognosis is poor, and treatment is given with multiagent chemotherapy. In a review of 19 women whose pregnancies were complicated by this lymphoma, 17 died within a year of diagnosis (Barnes, 1998).

image Leukemias

In general, these malignancies arise either from lymphoid tissues—lymphoblastic or lymphocytic leukemias, or from bone marrow—myeloid leukemias. They can be acute or chronic. Although adult leukemias are more prevalent after age 40, they still are among the most common malignancies of young women. Leukemia was diagnosed in 1 in 40,000 pregnancies reported to the California Cancer Registry (Smith, 2003). In a review of 350 reports of pregnancy complicated by leukemia, of 72 cases reported from 1975 until 1988, 44 had acute myelogenous leukemia; 20 had acute lymphocytic leukemia; and eight had one of the chronic leukemias (Caligiuri, 1989). The last are uncommon in young women, and chronic hairy-cell leukemia has been reported in only six pregnancies (Stiles, 1998).

Acute leukemias almost always cause marked peripheral blood count abnormalities, and frequently there is an elevated white blood cell count with readily recognizable circulating blast cells. The diagnosis is made from bone marrow biopsy.

Currently, with contemporary therapy, remission during pregnancy is common, compared with almost 100-percent mortality before 1970. The goal of remission is aggressively pursued with multiagent chemotherapy. There is no evidence that pregnancy termination further improves the prognosis, however, abortion is a consideration in early pregnancy to avoid potential chemotherapy teratogenesis. One example is treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with all-trans-retinoic acid, also known as tretinoin (Carradice, 2002; Celo, 1994). This is a potent teratogen that causes retinoic acid syndrome (Chap. 12p. 251). In other cases, pregnancy termination before viability may simplify management of the acutely ill woman.

Other than these caveats, treatment of pregnant women with leukemia is similar to that for nonpregnant women. After induction chemotherapy, postremission maintenance therapy is mandatory to prevent a relapse, which is usually then treated with stem-cell transplantation (Wetzler, 2012). If allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is indicated, early delivery is considered. With some chronic leukemias, it may be possible to delay therapy until after delivery (Fey, 2008). As with lymphoma, infection and hemorrhage are significant complications that should be anticipated in women with active disease. Puerperal infection is particularly problematic.

There are few contemporaneous studies of leukemia treated during pregnancy. In an earlier review of 58 cases, Reynoso and colleagues (1987) reported that 75 percent were diagnosed after the first trimester. Half were acute myelogenous leukemia, which had a remission rate of 75 percent with chemotherapy. Only 40 percent of these pregnancies resulted in liveborn infants. Preterm delivery and stillbirth rates were also reported to be increased (Caligiuri, 1989).

MALIGNANT MELANOMA

These malignant tumors most frequently originate in the skin from a preexisting nevus and its pigment-producing melanocytes. Melanomas should be suspected in pigmented lesions with changes in contour, surface elevation, discoloration, itching, bleeding, or ulceration, which should prompt biopsy. They are most common in light-skinned whites and develop relatively frequently in women of childbearing age. They sometimes are first diagnosed during pregnancy, and the reported incidence ranges widely from 0.03 to 2.8 per 1000 live births (Eibye, 2013; Smith, 2003; Wong, 1990). This is likely because many are treated on an outpatient basis, and thus they are not entered into a tumor registry. As noted on page 1221, malignant melanoma is one of the tumors that is known to metastasize to the placenta and fetus. Placental evaluation for metastasis should be performed after delivery.

image Staging and Treatment

Staging is clinical as follows: stage I is a melanoma with no palpable lymph nodes; in stage II, lymph nodes are palpable; and in stage III, there are distant metastases. For patients with stage I, tumor thickness is the single most important predictor of survival. The Clark classification includes five levels of involvement by depth into the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous fat. The Breslow scale measures tumor thickness and size, in addition to depth of invasion.

Primary surgical treatment for melanoma is determined by the stage and includes wide local resection, sometimes with extensive regional lymph node dissection. Schwartz and associates (2003) recommend sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy using 99mTc-sulfur colloid, which has a calculated fetal dose of 0.014 mSv or 0.014 mGy. Routine regional node dissection reportedly improves survival in nonpregnant patients with microscopic metastases (Cascinelli, 1998). For pregnant patients, an algorithm has been proposed that begins with resection of the primary tumor under local anesthesia and postpones sentinel lymph node biopsy until after delivery (Broer, 2012). Although prophylactic chemotherapy or immunotherapy is usually avoided during pregnancy, it may be given if indicated by tumor stage and maternal prognosis. In most cases of distant metastatic melanoma, treatment is at best palliative. At this time, the role of estrogen receptor-β in melanoma progression is under investigation, and it may be a target for therapeutic intervention (de Giorgi, 2011).

image Prognosis

Stage-for-stage, survival is equivalent between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Therapeutic abortion does not appear to improve survival. Clinical stage is the strongest determinant of survival, and women with deep cutaneous invasion or regional node involvement have the worst prognosis (Dipaola, 1997; Kjems, 1993; Lens, 2008). Approximately 60 percent of recurrences will manifest within 2 years, and 90 percent by 5 years. Thus, most recommend that pregnancy be avoided for 3 to 5 years after surgical resection. Interim contraception can include combination oral contraceptives, as they do not appear to have adverse effects (Gandini, 2011). Related, subsequent pregnancies in women with localized melanoma do not appear to adversely affect cancer survival rates (Driscoll, 2009).

GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT CANCER

image Colorectal Cancer

Malignancies of the colon and rectum are the third most frequent in women of all age groups in the United States (American Cancer Society, 2012). Even so, colorectal tumors seldom complicate pregnancy because they are uncommon before age 40. Smith and colleagues (2003) reported an approximate incidence of 1 per 150,000 deliveries in the California Cancer Registry. It was about 1 per 35,000 births in the Danish Registry (Eibye, 2013). The majority—80 percent—of colorectal carcinomas in pregnant women arise from the rectum. In one review, there were only 41 reported cases in pregnancy with cancer above the peritoneal reflection (Chan, 1999).

The most frequent symptoms of colorectal cancer are abdominal pain, distention, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and rectal bleeding. The diagnosis may be delayed because many of these symptoms are common in pregnancy. Certainly, if symptoms suggestive of colon disease persist, digital rectal examination, stool tests for occult blood, and flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be done.

Treatment of colon cancer in pregnant women follows the same general guidelines as for nonpregnant women. Without evidence of metastatic disease, surgical resection is preferred, but most pregnant women have advanced lesions (Walsh, 1998). During the first half of pregnancy, hysterectomy is not necessary to perform colon or rectal resection, and thus, therapeutic abortion is not mandated. During later pregnancy, therapy may be delayed until fetal maturation, however, hemorrhage, obstruction, or perforation may force surgical intervention (Minter, 2005). Vaginal delivery is usually avoided because lower rectal lesions may cause dystocia, or delivery may cause tumor hemorrhage.

There is no evidence that pregnancy influences the course of colorectal cancer, and the prognosis appears to be similar to that for identical stages in nonpregnant patients (Dahling, 2009). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a tumor marker for colon cancer, and although it may be elevated during normal pregnancy, baseline values may be useful to monitor disease (Minter, 2005).

image Other Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Gastric cancer is rarely associated with pregnancy, and most reported cases are from Japan. Hirabayashi and associates (1987) reviewed outcomes in 60 pregnant women during a 70-year period from 1916 to 1985. Delayed diagnosis during pregnancy is common, and the prognosis is consistently poor (Lee, 2009). It is axiomatic that persistent unexplained upper gastrointestinal symptoms should be evaluated by endoscopy.

With Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, tumors typically found in the duodenum or pancreas secrete excess gastrin. This leads to increased stomach acid production and gastric ulceration. Most tumors are slow growing, and thus, the primary goal in pregnancy is control of acid secretion. Some advise surgical resection before pregnancy (Stewart, 1997). In pregnant women with metastatic disease or in those with previously undiagnosed tumors, antacids and antisecretory treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors usually controls acid secretion.

MISCELLANEOUS TUMORS

Various other neoplasms have been reported in pregnancy and are usually the subject of case reports. Examples include carcinoid tumors, which are usually of gastrointestinal origin (Durkin, 1983). Both pancreatic and hepatocellular cancer are rare during pregnancy (Kakoza, 2009; Marinoni, 2006; Papoutsis, 2012; Perera, 2011). Bladerston and coworkers (1998) described a massive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma masquerading as HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome. Gastrointestinal cancers during pregnancy are often discovered because of ovarian metastases—Krukenberg tumors—which have a bleak prognosis (Glišić, 2006). Central nervous system benign and malignant neoplasms had a reported frequency of 1 in 10,000 to 28,000 (Eibye, 2013; Smith, 2003). Bladder and urachal duct carcinoma have been rarely reported coincident with pregnancy (McNally, 2013; Yeaton-Massey, 2013). Finally, bone and vaginal tumors have been described (ElNaggar, 2012; Kathiresan, 2011).

REFERENCES

Abalovich M, Amino N, Barbour LA, et al: 2007 management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:S1, 2007

Abdel-Hady ES, Hemida RA, Gamal A, et al: Cancer during pregnancy: perinatal outcome after in utero exposure to chemotherapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(2):283, 2012

Ackermann S, Gehrsitz C, Mehihorn G, et al: Management and course of histologically verified cervical carcinoma in situ during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1134, 2006

Al-Adnani M, Kiho L, Scheimberg I: Maternal pancreatic carcinoma metastatic to the placenta: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Dev Pathol 10:61, 2007

Alexander A, Harris RM, Grossman D, et al: Vulvar melanoma: diffuse melanosis and metastases to the placenta. J Am Acad Dermatol 50(20):293, 2004

Alexander A, Samlowski WE, Grossman D, et al: Metastatic melanoma in pregnancy: risk of transplacental metastases in the infant. J Clin Oncol 21:2179, 2003

Ali R, Ozkalemkas F, Kimya Y, et al: Imatinib use during pregnancy and breast feeding: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:169, 2009

Alouini S, Rida K, Mathevet P: Cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: implications of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 108(3):472, 2008

Altman JF, Lowe L, Redman B, et al: Placental metastasis of maternal melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 49:1150, 2003

Alves GV, Santin AP, Furlanetto TW: Prognosis of thyroid cancer related to pregnancy: a systematic review. J Thyroid Res 2011:1, 2011

Amant F, Deckers S, Van Calsteren K, et al: Breast cancer in pregnancy: recommendations of an international consensus meeting. Eur J Cancer 46(18):3158, 2010

Amant F, Loibl S, Neven P, et al: Breast cancer in pregnancy. Lancet 379:570, 2012a

Amant F, Van Calsteren K, Halaska MJ: Long-term cognitive and cardiac outcomes after prenatal exposure to chemotherapy in children aged 18 months or older: an observational study. Lancet Oncol, 13(3):256, 2012b

American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2012

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 299, September 2004, Reaffirmed 2009

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Human papillomavirus vaccination. Committee Opinion No. 467, September 2010

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: The role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Committee Opinion No. 477, March 2011

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Practice Bulletin No. 96, August 2008, Reaffirmed 2012a

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Screening for cervical cancer. Practice Bulletin No. 109, November 2012b

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors. Practice Bulletin No. 140, December 2013a

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Management of adnexal masses. Practice Bulletin No. 83, July 2007, Reaffirmed 2013b

American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100(5):1224, 2013

American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 90(5 Suppl):S188, 2008

Anderson ML, Mari G, Schwartz PE: Gynecologic malignancies in pregnancy. In Barnea ER, Jauniaux E, Schwartz PE (eds): Cancer and Pregnancy. London, Springer, 2001, p 33

Andersson TM, Johansson AL, Hsieh CC et al: Increasing incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 114:568, 2009

Andrieu N, Goldgar DE, Easton DF, et al: Pregnancies, breast-feeding, and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS). J Natl Cancer Inst 98:535, 2006

Antoniou AC, Shenton A, Maher ER, et al: Parity and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2. Breast Cancer Res 8:R72, 2006

Armitage J: Early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 363:653, 2010

Aslam N, Ong C, Woelfer B, et al: Serum CA125 at 11–14 weeks of gestation in women with morphologically normal ovaries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107:689, 2000

Averette HE, Mirhashemi R, Moffat FL: Pregnancy after breast carcinoma: the ultimate medical challenge. Cancer 85:2301, 1999

Averette HE, Nasser N, Yankow SL, et al: Cervical conization in pregnancy: analysis of 180 operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106:543, 1970

Avilés A, Neri N: Hematological malignancies and pregnancy: a final report of 84 children who received chemotherapy in utero. Clin Lymphoma 2(3):173, 2001

Azim HA Jr, Azim H, Peccatori FA: Treatment of cancer during pregnancy with monoclonal antibodies: a real challenge. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 6(6):821, 2010

Azim HA Jr, Metzger-Filho O, deAzambuja E, et al: Pregnancy occurring during or following adjuvant trastuzumab in patients enrolled in the HERA trial (BIG 01-01). Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1)387, 2012

Azziz R: Adenomyosis in pregnancy: a review. J Reprod Med 31:223, 1986

Barnes MN, Barrett JC, Kimberlin DF, et al: Burkitt lymphoma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 92:675, 1998

Beadle BM, Woodward WA, Middleton LP, et al: The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in women < or = 35 years. Cancer 115(6):1174, 2009

Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, et al: Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83,000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363:1007, 2004

Berg WA, Campassi CI, Loffe OB: Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 227:183, 2003

Berry DL, Theriault RL, Holmes FA, et al: Management of breast cancer during pregnancy using a standardized protocol. J Clin Oncol 17:855, 1999

Bladerston KD, Tewari K, Azizi F, et al: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma masquerading as the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) in pregnancy: case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:823, 1998

Boulay R, Podczaski E: Ovarian cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:3856, 1998

Braems G, Denys H, DeWever O, et al: Use of tamoxifen before and during pregnancy. Oncologist 16(11):1547, 2011

Brenner B, Avivi I, Lishner M: Haematological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet 379:580, 2012

Brent RL: Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures. Teratology 59:182, 1999

Brewer M, Kueck An, Runowicz CD: Chemotherapy in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:602, 2011

Briggs GC, Freeman RK, Yaffee SJ (eds): Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: a Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk, 9th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011, p 499

Broer N, Buonocore S, Goldberg C: A proposal for the timing of management of patients with melanoma presenting during pregnancy. J Surg Oncol 106(1):36, 2012

Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, et al: Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG 114:70, 2007

Bulun SE: Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 369:1344, 2013

Bumpers HL, Butler KL, Best IM: Endometrioma of the abdominal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1709, 2002

Caligiuri MA, Mayer RJ: Pregnancy and leukemia. Semin Oncol 16:388, 1989

Cardonick E, Dougherty R, Grana G et al: Breast cancer during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes. Cancer 16:76, 2010

Cardonick E, Iacobucci A: Use of chemotherapy during human pregnancy. Lancet Oncol 5:283, 2004

Carradice D, Austin N, Bayston K, et al: Successful treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia during pregnancy. Clin Lab Haematol 24:307, 2002

Cascinelli N, Morabito A, Santinami M, et al: Immediate or delayed dissection of regional nodes in patients with melanoma of the trunk: a randomized trial. Lancet 351:793, 1998

Caspi B, Levi R, Appelman Z, et al: Conservative management of ovarian cystic teratoma during pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:503, 2000

Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, et al: Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study. BMJ 345:e5174, 2012

Celik C, Acar A, Cicek N, et al: Can myomectomy be performed during pregnancy? Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:79, 2002

Celo JS, Kim HC, Houlihan C, et al: Acute promyelocytic leukemia in pregnancy: all-trans retinoic acid as a newer therapeutic option. Obstet Gynecol 83:808, 1994

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: FDA licensure of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 59:626, 2010

Chan YM, Ngai SW, Lao TT: Colon cancer in pregnancy. A case report. J Reprod Med 44:733, 1999

Chen CD, Chen SU, Yang YS: Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26(6):817, 2012

Chin N, Platt AB, Nuovo GJ: Squamous intraepithelial lesions arising in benign endocervical polyps: a report of 9 cases with correlation to the Pap smears, HPV analysis, and immunoprofile. Int J Gynecol Pathol 27(4):582, 2008

Choi JR, Levine D, Finberg H: Luteoma of pregnancy: sonographic findings in two cases. J Ultrasound Med 19(12):877, 2000

Clark H, Kurinczuk JJ, Lee AJ, et al: Obstetric outcomes in cancer survivors. Obstet Gynecol 110(4):849, 2007

Clement PB: Tumor-like lesions of the ovary associated with pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12(2):108, 1993

Cohen JB, Blum KA: Evaluation and management of lymphoma and leukemia in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:556, 2011

Connor JP: Noninvasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:331, 1998

Coronado GD, Marshall LM, Schwartz SM: Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 95:764, 2000

Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al: Disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(3):543, 2002

Dahl SK, Thomas MA, Williams DB, et al: Maternal virilization due to luteoma associated with delayed lactation. Fertil Steril 90(5):2006.e17, 2008

Dahling MT, Xing G, Cress R, et al: Pregnancy-associated colon and rectal cancer: perinatal and cancer outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22(3):204, 2009

Dale DC, Cottle TE, Fier CJ, et al: Severe chronic neutropenia: treatment and follow-up of patients in the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry. Am J Hematol 72(2):82, 2003

Dana A, Buchanan KM, Goss MA, et al: Pregnancy outcomes from the pregnancy registry of a human papillomavirus type 6/11/16/18 vaccine. Obstet Gynecol 2009 114(6):1170, 2009

De Carolis S, Fatigante G, Ferrazzani S, et al: Uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Fetal Diagn Ther 16:116, 2001

de Giorgi V, Gori A, Grazzini M, et al: Estrogens, estrogen receptors and melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 11:739, 2011

Descamps D, Hardt K, Spiessens B, et al: Safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine for cervical cancer prevention: a pooled analysis of 11 clinical trials. Hum Vaccin 5(5):332, 2009

Diller L: Adult primary care after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 365:1417, 2011

Dipaola RS, Goodin S, Ratzell M, et al: Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 66:526, 1997

Djavadian D, Braendle W, Jaenicke F: Laparoscopic oophoropexy for the treatment of recurrent torsion of the adnexa in pregnancy: case report and review. Fertil Steril 82(4):933, 2004

Dorum A, Blom GP, Ekerhovd E, et al: Prevalence and histologic diagnosis of adnexal cysts in postmenopausal women: an autopsy study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(1):48, 2005

Driscoll MS, Grant-Kels JM: Nevi and melanoma in the pregnant woman. Clin Dermatol 27(1):116, 2009

Dunton CJ: Management of atypical glandular cells and adenocarcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 35(4):623, 2008

Durkin JW Jr: Carcinoid tumor and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145: 757, 1983

Eibye S, Kjaer SK, Mellemkjaer L: Incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer in Denmark, 1977–2006. Obstet Gynecol 122:608, 2013

El-Hemaidi I, Robinson SE: Management of haematological malignancy in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26(1):149, 2012

ElNaggar A, Patil A, Singh K, et al: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 119:445, 2012

Erkanli S, Ayhan A: Fertility-sparing therapy in young women with endometrial cancer: 2010 update. Int J Gyn Cancer 20:1170, 2010

Fader AN, Alward EK, Niederhauser A, et al: Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: a multi-institutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:113, 2010

Favero G, Chiantera V, Oleszczuk A, et al: Invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy: laparoscopic nodal evaluation before oncologic treatment delay. Gynecol Oncol 118:123, 2010

Fey MF, Surbek D: Leukaemia and pregnancy. Recent Results Cancer Res 178:97, 2008

Fife KH, Katz BP, Roush J, et al: Cancer-associated human papillomavirus types are selectively increased in the cervix of women in the first trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1487, 1996

FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology: Current FIGO staging for cancer of the vagina, fallopian tube, ovary, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(1):3, 2009a

FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology: Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:103, 2009b

Fleischer AC, Dinesh MS, Entman SS: Sonographic evaluation of maternal disorders during pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am 28:51, 1990

Friedman E, Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, et al: Spontaneous and therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 8:R15, 2006

Fuchs N, Smorgick N, Tovbin Y, et al: Oophoropexy to prevent adnexal torsion: how, when, and for whom? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(2):205, 2010

FUTURE II Study Group: Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med 356:1915, 2007

Gandini S, Iodice S, Koomen E, et al: Hormonal and reproductive factors in relation to melanoma in women: current review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 47(17):2607, 2011

García-Manero M, Royo MP, Espinos J, et al: Pregnancy associated breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(2):215, 2009

Garland SM, Ault KA, Gall SA, et al: Pregnancy and infant outcomes in the clinical trials of a human papillomavirus type 6/11/16/18 vaccine: a combined analysis of five randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1179, 2009

Genadry R, Parmley T, Woodruff JD: The origin and clinical behavior of the parovarian tumor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129(8):873, 1977

Genta PR, Dias ML, Janiszewski TA, et al: Streptococcus agalactiae endocarditis and giant pyomyoma simulating ovarian cancer. South Med J 94:508, 2001

Germain M, Rarick T, Robins E: Management of intermittent ovarian torsion by laparoscopic oophoropexy. Obstet Gynecol 88(4 Pt 2):715, 1996

Giuntoli RL II, Vang RS, Bristow RE: Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):492, 2006

Glišić A, Atanacković J: Krukenberg tumor in pregnancy. The lethal outcome. Pathol Oncol Res 12(2):108, 2006

Goldman NA, Goldberg GL: Late recurrence of squamous cell cervical cancer in an episiotomy site after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101:1127, 2003

Gotlieb WH, Beiner ME, Shalmon B, et al: Outcome of fertility-sparing treatment with progestins in young patients with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 102:718, 2003

Gottschalk N, Jacobs VR, Hein R, et al: Advanced metastatic melanoma during pregnancy: a multidisciplinary challenge. Onkologie 32:748, 2009

Green DM, Whitton JA, Stovall M, et al: Pregnancy outcome of female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1070, 2002

Greer BE, Easterling TR, McLennan DA, et al: Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 34:61, 1989

Griffith WF, Werner CL: Benign disorders of the lower reproductive tract. In Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, et al (eds): Williams Gynecology, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 110

Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, et al: Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl): 7S, 2012

Haas JF: Pregnancy in association with newly diagnosed cancer: a population-based epidemiologic assessment. Int J Cancer 34:229, 1984

Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, et al: Carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 59:735, 1982

Haga Y, Sakamoto K, Egami H, et al: Evaluation of serum CA125 values in healthy individuals and pregnant women. Am J Med Sci 292(1):25, 1986

Hahn KM, Johnson PH, Gordon N, et al: Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Cancer 107:1219, 2006

Hall EJ: Scientific view of low-level radiation risks. Radiographics 11:509, 1991

Hannuna KY, Putignani L, Silvestri E, et al: Incidental endometrial adenocarcinoma in early pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(9):1580, 2009

Heinzman AB: Pelvic mass. In Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, et al (eds): Williams Gynecology, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 246

Heller DS, Cracchiolo B, Hameed M, et al: Pregnancy-associated invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva in a 28-year-old, HIV-negative woman: a case report. J Reprod Med 45:659, 2000

Higgins S, Haffty BG: Pregnancy and lactation after breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer. Cancer 73:2175, 1994

Hirabayashi M, Ueo H, Okudaira Y, et al: Early gastric cancer and a concomitant pregnancy. Am Surg 53:730, 1987

Hoffman MS, Sayer RA: A guide to management: adnexal masses in pregnancy. OBG Management 19(3):27, 2007

Homer H, Saridogan E: Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 94(1):324, 2010

Honore LH, O’Hara KE: Serous papillary neoplasms arising in paramesonephric parovarian cysts. A report of eight cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 59(6):525, 1980

Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, et al: Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med 365:1304, 2011

Horning SJ, Hoppe RT, Kaplan HS, et al: Female reproductive potential after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 304:1377, 1981

Hudis CA: Trastuzumab—mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 357:39, 2007

Hunter MI, Tewari KS, Monk BJ: Cervical neoplasia in pregnancy. Part 2: current treatment of invasive disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(1):10, 2008

Irving JA, Clement PB: Nonneoplastic lesions of the ovary. In Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM (eds): Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed. New York, Springer, 2011, p 606

Ives A, Saunders C, Bulsara M, et al: Pregnancy after breast cancer: population based study. BMJ 334:194, 2006

Jacobs C, Donaldson SS, Rosenberg SA, et al: Management of the pregnant patient with Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Intern Med 95:669, 1981

Jacob JH, Stringer CA: Diagnosis and management of cancer during pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 14:79, 1990

Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, et al: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 114:504, 2009

Jernström H, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, et al: Breast-feeding and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(14):1094, 2004

Johannsson O, Loman N, Borg A, et al: Pregnancy-associated breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutation carriers. Lancet 352:1359, 1998

Kakoza RM, Vollmer CM Jr, Stuart KE, et al: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pregnant patient: a case report and literature review. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):535, 2009

Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al: ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1447, 2007

Kaňová N, Bičíková M: Hyperandrogenic states in pregnancy. Physiol Res 60(2):243, 2011

Kao HW, Wu CJ, Chung KT, et al: MR imaging of pregnancy luteoma: a case report and correlation with the clinical features. Korean J Radiol 6(1):44, 2005

Kathiresan AS, Johnson JN, Hood BJ, et al: Giant cell bone tumor of the thoracic spine presenting in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 118(2 Pt 2):428, 2011

Kim CH, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, et al: Reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125(3):585, 2012

Kim SS, Klemp J, Fabian C: Breast cancer and fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 95(5):1535, 2011

King RM, Welch JS, Martin JK Jr, et al: Carcinoma of the breast associated with pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160:228, 1985

Kjems E, Krag C: Melanoma and pregnancy. Acta Oncol 32:371, 1993

Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, et al: Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(4):357, 2008

Ko EM, Van Le L: Chemotherapy for gynecologic cancers occurring during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 66(5):291, 2011

Korbin CD, Brown DL, Welch WR: Paraovarian cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas: sonographic characteristics in 14 cases. Radiology 208(2):459, 1998

Kuller JA, Zucker PK, Peng TC: Vulvar leiomyosarcoma in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:164, 1990

Langagergaard V, Gislum M, Skriver MV, et al: Birth outcome in women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 94:142, 2006

Langagergaard V, Horvath-Puho E, Norgaard M, et al: Hodgkin’s disease and birth outcome: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Br J Cancer 98(1):183, 2008

Larsen EC, Schmiegelow K, Rechnitzer C, et al: Radiotherapy at a young age reduces uterine volume of childhood cancer survivors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:96, 2004

Larson PS, Ungarelli RA, de Las Morenas A, et al: In utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) does not increase genomic instability in normal or neoplastic breast epithelium. Cancer 107(9):212, 2006

Lashgari M, Behmaram B, Ellis M: Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 39:652, 1994

Laughlin SK, Baird DD, Savitz DA, et al: Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 113(3):630, 2009

Lawrenz B, Henes M, Neunhoeffer E, et al: Pregnancy after successful cancer treatment: what needs to be considered? Onkologie 35:128, 2012

Lee HJ, Lee IK, Kim JW, et al: Clinical characteristics of gastric cancer associated with pregnancy. Dig Surg 26(1):31, 2009

Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, et al: Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol Oncol 101:315, 2006

Lens M, Bataille V: Melanoma in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors in women: current review on controversial issues. Cancer Causes Control 19(5):437, 2008

Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, et al: Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology 256(3):943, 2010

Lin YH, Hwang JL, Huang LW, et al: Pyomyoma after a cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:571, 2002

Lippman ME: Breast Cancer. In Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, et al (eds): Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 18th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 754

Liu J, Zanotti K: Management of the adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 117:1413, 2011

Longo DL: Malignancies of lymphoid cells. In Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, et al (eds): Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 18th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 919

Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, et al: Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(19):2500, 2013

Lutz MH, Underwood PB Jr, Rozier JC, et al: Genital malignancy in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129:536, 1977

Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, et al: Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(1):73, 2008

Marinoni, E, Di Netta T, Caramanico L, et al: Metastatic pancreatic cancer in late pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19(4):247, 2006

Masarie K, Katz V, Balderston K: Pregnancy luteomas: clinical presentations and management strategies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65(9):575, 2010

Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD, et al: Pregnancy and genital sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 26(7):507, 2009

McGovern PG, Noah R, Koenigsberg R, et al: Adnexal torsion and pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 54(9):601, 1999

McNally L, Osmundson S, Barth R, et al: Urachal duct carcinoma complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 122:469, 2013

Minter A, Malik R, Ledbetter L, et al: Colon cancer in pregnancy. Cancer Control 12(3):196, 2005

Mondi MM, Cuenca RE, Ollila DW, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy: initial clinical experience. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):218, 2007

Morice P, Uzan C, Gouy S, et al: Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet 379:558, 2012

Navrozoglou I, Vrekoussis T, Kontostolis E et al: Breast cancer during pregnancy: a mini-review. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:837, 2008

Neiger R, Sonek JD, Croom CS, et al: Pregnancy-related changes in the size of uterine leiomyomas. J Reprod Med 51:671, 2006

Nisker JA, Shubat M: Stage IB cervical carcinoma and pregnancy: report of 49 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:203, 1983

Niwa K, Tagami K, Lian Z, et al: Outcome of fertility-preserving treatment in young women with endometrial carcinomas. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112:317, 2005

Nugent P, O’Connell TX: Breast cancer and pregnancy. Arch Surg 120:1221, 1985

O’Gara P, Shepard J, Yared K, et al: Case 39-2009L: a 28-year-old pregnant woman with acute cardiac failure. N Engl J Med 361:2462, 2009

Oto A, Ernst R, Jesse MK, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in the evaluation of pregnant patients with neoplasms. Am J Perinatol 24(4):243, 2007

Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J, et al: Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 374(9686):301, 2009

Pacini F, Castagna MG: Approach to and treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Med Clin North Am 96(2):369, 2012

Palmer J, Vatish M, Tidy J: Epithelial ovarian cancer in pregnancy: a review of the literature. BJOG 116:480, 2009

Papoutsis D, Sindos M, Papantoniou N, et al: Management options and prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma at 16 weeks’ gestation: a case report. J Reprod Med 57:167, 2012

Park JY, Kim DY, Suh DS, et al: Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 25:9, 2014

Pavlidis N: Cancer and pregnancy: what should we know about the management with systemic treatment of pregnant women with cancer? Eur J Cancer 47 Suppl 3:S348, 2011

Pavlidis NA: Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. Oncologist 7:279, 2002

Pereg D, Koren G, Lishner M: The treatment of Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in pregnancy. Haematologica 92(9):1230, 2007

Perera D, Kandavar R, Palacios E: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: clinical and radiologic manifestations. J La State Med Soc 163:114, 2011

Pettersson BF, Andersson S, Hellman K, et al: Invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: 90 years of experience. Cancer 116:2343, 2010

Pritts EA: Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56:483, 2001

Qidwai II, Caughey AB, Jacoby AF: Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 107:376, 2006

Randall ME, Michael H, Long H III, et al: Uterine cervix. In Barakat RR, Markman M, Randall ME (eds): Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology, 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009, p 647

Reynoso EE, Shepherd FA, Messner HA, et al: Acute leukemia during pregnancy: the Toronto Leukemia Study Group experience with long-term follow-up of children exposed in utero to chemotherapeutic agents. J Clin Oncol 5:1098, 1987

Richardson DL: Cervical cancer. In Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, et al (eds): Williams Gynecology, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 769

Rizack T, Mega A, Legare R, et al: Management of hematological malignancies during pregnancy. Am J Hematol 84(12):830, 2009

Robison LL, Green DM, Hudson M, et al: Long-term outcomes of adult survivors of childhood cancer. Results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer Suppl 104(11):2557, 2005

Rodriguez AO, Chew H, Cress R, et al: Evidence of poorer survival in pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol 112(1):71, 2008

Rosenkranz KM, Lucci A: Surgical treatment of pregnancy associated breast cancer. Breast Dis 23:87, 2006

Russell P, Robboy SJ: Ovarian cysts, tumor-like, iatrogenic and miscellaneous conditions. In Robboy SJ, Mutter GL, Prat J, et al (eds): Robboy’s Pathology of the Female Reproductive Tract, 2nd ed. London, Churchill Livingstone, 2009, p 577

Salvador E, Bienstock J, Blakemore KJ, et al: Leiomyomata uteri, genetic amniocentesis, and the risk of second-trimester spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:913, 2002

Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, et al: The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105:325, 2005

Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al: American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 137(4):516, 2012

Schammel DP, Mittal KR, Kaplan K, et al: Endometrial adenocarcinoma associated with intrauterine pregnancy: a report of five cases and a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Pathol 17:327, 1998

Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, et al: Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 105:1098, 2005

Schwartz JL, Mozurkewich EL, Johnson TM: Current management of patients with melanoma who are pregnant, want to get pregnant, or do not want to get pregnant. Cancer 97(9):2130, 2003

Shanbhag S, Clark H, Timmaraju V, et al: Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 114:727, 2009

Shavell VI, Thakur M, Sawant A, et al: Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with sonographically identified large uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 97(1):107, 2012

Sheiner E, Bashiri A, Levy A, et al: Obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol Surv 59:647, 2004

Shen T, Vortmeyer AO, Zhuang Z, et al: High frequency of allelic loss of BRCA2 gene in pregnancy-associated breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1686, 1999

Shepherd JH, Spencer C, Herod J, et al: Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer—cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113:719, 2006

Sherard GB III, Hodson CA, Williams HJ, et al: Adnexal masses and pregnancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:358, 2003

Shulman LN, Hitt RA, Ferry JA: Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 4-2008. A 33-year-old pregnant woman with swelling of the left breast and shortness of breath. N Engl J Med 358(5):513, 2008

Signorelli M, Caspani G, Bonazzi C, et al: Fertility-sparing treatment in young women with endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia: a prospective single-institution experience of 21 cases. BJOG 116(1):114, 2009

Signorello LB, Cohen SS, Bosetti C, et al: Female survivors of childhood cancer: preterm birth and low birth weight among their children. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1453, 2006

Signorello LB, Mulvihill JJ, Green DM, et al: Stillbirth and neonatal death in relation to radiation exposure before conception: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 376:624, 2010

Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ, Nogales F, et al: Tumors of the Uterine Corpus [Epithelial tumors and related lesions]. In Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (eds): World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. 2003, p 221

Sisson JC, Freitas J, McDougall IR, et al: Radiation safety in the treatment of patients with thyroid diseases by radioiodine 131I: practice recommendations of the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid 21(4):335, 2011

Smith LH, Danielsen B, Allen ME, et al: Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1128, 2003

Soares SR, Gómez R, Simón C, et al: Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 14(4):321, 2008

Sood AK, Sorosky JI: Invasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: how to manage the dilemma? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:343, 1998

Spanheimer PM, Graham MM, Sugg SL, et al: Measurement of uterine radiation exposure from lymphoscintigraphy indicates safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1143, 2009

Spitzer M, Kaushal N, Benjamin F: Maternal CA-125 levels in pregnancy and the puerperium. J Reprod Med 43:387, 1998

Stewart CA, Termanini B, Sutliff VE, et al: Management of the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:224, 1997

Stiles GM, Stanco LM, Saven A, et al: Splenectomy for hairy cell leukemia in pregnancy. J Perinatol 18:200, 1998

Stokes LS, Wallace MJ, Godwin RB, et al: Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(8):1153, 2010

Stout MJ, Odibo AO, Graseck AS, et a: Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 116(5):1056, 2010

Takushi M, Moromizato H, Sakumoto K, et al: Management of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: outcome of intentional delay in treatment. Gynecol Oncol 87:185, 2002

Tannus JF, Hertzberg BS, Haystead CM, et al: Unilateral luteoma of pregnancy mimicking a malignant ovarian mass on magnetic resonance and ultrasound. J Magn Reson Imaging 29(3):713, 2009

Tavassoli FA, Devilee P: Tumours of the ovary and peritoneum. In World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2003, p 114

Titus-Ernstoff L, Troisi R, Hatch EE, et al: Mortality in women given diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy. Br J Cancer 95:107, 2006

Torashima M, Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, et al: Invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: MR imaging. Comp Med Imaging Graph 21(4):253, 1997

Ungár L, Smith JR, Pálfavli L, et al: Abdominal radical trachelectomy during pregnancy to preserve pregnancy and fertility. Obstet Gynecol 108:811, 2006

Valachis A, Tsali L, Pesce LL, et al: Safety of pregnancy after primary breast carcinoma in young women: a meta-analysis to overcome bias of healthy mother effect studies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65:786, 2010

Van Calsteren K, Hanssens M, Moerman P, et al: Successful conservative treatment of endocervical adenocarcinoma stage Ib1 diagnosed early in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(2):250, 2008

van der Vange N, Weverling GJ, Ketting BW, et al: The prognosis of cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: a matched cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 85:1022, 1995

van Vliet W, van Loon AJ, ten Hoor KA, et al: Cervical carcinoma during pregnancy: outcome of planned delay in treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 79:153, 1998

Velentgas P, Daling JR, Malone KE, et al: Pregnancy after breast carcinoma: outcomes and influence on mortality. Cancer 85:2424, 1999

Viswanathan S, Ramaswamy B: Pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(4):546, 2011

Walsh C, Fazio VW: Cancer of the colon, rectum, and anus during pregnancy. The surgeon’s perspective. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 27:257, 1998

Wang YC, Su HY, Liu JY, et al: Maternal and female fetal virilization caused by pregnancy luteomas. Fertil Steril 84:509.e15, 2005

Werner CL, Lo JY, Heffernan, et al: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 115:605, 2010

Weitzman VN, DiLuigi AJ, Maier DB, et al: Prevention of recurrent adnexal torsion. Fertil Steril 90(5):2018.e1, 2008

Wetzler M, Byrd JC, Bloomfield CD: Acute and chronic myeloid leukemia. In Kasper DL, Brauward E, Fauci AS, et al (eds): Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 18th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2012, p 905

Whitecar MP, Turner S, Higby MK: Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:19, 1999

Williams SF, Schilsky RL: Neoplastic disorders. In Barron WM, Lindheimer MD (eds): Medical Disorders During Pregnancy, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2001, p 392

Winther JF, Boice JD Jr, Frederiksen K, et al: Radiotherapy for childhood cancer and risk for congenital malformations in offspring: a population-based cohort study. Clin Genet 75(1):50, 2009

Wo JY, Viswanathan AN: Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcome in female cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(5):1304, 2009

Wohlfahrt J, Olsen JH, Melby M: Breast cancer risk after childbirth in young women with family history. Cancer Causes Control 13:169, 2002

Wong DJ, Strassner HT: Melanoma in pregnancy: a literature review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 33:782, 1990

Woo JC, Yu T, Hurd TC: Breast cancer in pregnancy. Arch Surg 138:91, 2003

Woodruff TK: The Oncofertility Consortium—addressing fertility in young people with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7(8):466, 2010

Wright TC Jr, Massad S, Dunton CJ, et al: 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(4):346, 2007a

Wright TC Jr, Massad S, Dunton CJ, et al: 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(4):340, 2007b

Yahata T, Numata M, Kashima K, et al: Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):49, 2008

Yazbeck CF, Sullivan SD. Thyroid disorders during pregnancy. Med Clin No America 96:235, 2012

Yazigi R, Sandstad J, Munoz AK: Primary staging in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 31:402, 1988

Yeaton-Massey A, Brookfield KF, Aziz N, et al: Maternal bladder cancer diagnosed at routine first-trimester obstetric ultrasound examination. Obstet Gynecol 122:464, 2013

Yost NP, Santoso JT, McIntire DD, et al: Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III lesions. Obstet Gynecol 93:359, 1999

Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, et al: Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150(2):190, 2010

Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Chrysikos D, et al: Platinum derivatives during pregnancy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 121:337, 2013

Zanetta G, Mariani E, Lissoni A, et al: A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110:578, 2003

Zemlickis D, Lishner M, Degendorfer P, et al: Maternal and fetal outcome after breast cancer in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:781, 1992

Zweizig S, Perron J, Grubb D, et al: Conservative management of adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(6 Pt 1):1791, 1993