ACP medicine, 3rd Edition


Liver and Pancreas Transplantation

Robert L. Carithers Jr. MD, FACP1

James D. Perkins MD2

1Professor of Medicine and Director, Hepatology Section, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, and Medical Director, Liver Transplantation Program, University of Washington School of Medicine

2Professor, Department of Surgery, and Chief, Division of Transplantation, University of Washington School of Medicine

The authors have no commercial relationships with manufacturers of products or providers of services discussed in this chapter.

January 2007

Liver Transplantation

More than 6,000 liver transplantations are performed annually in the United States.1 Enhancements in patient selection, surgical technique, and the availability of powerful immunosuppressive agents have resulted in steady improvement in patient survival. As a result, liver transplantation has been accepted as the standard of care for patients with severe acute or chronic liver disease in whom conventional modalities of therapy have failed. The major obstacle to the procedure is the critical shortage of donor organs.

Candidates for Transplantation

Any patient with acute or chronic liver failure is a potential candidate for liver transplantation; there are a number of common indications [see Table 1].2 The three most important questions addressed during the evaluation of candidates for liver transplantation are the following:

  1. Can the patient survive the operation and perioperative hospitalization?
  2. Can the patient comply with long-term immunosuppressive therapy?
  3. Does the patient have other medical conditions that would severely compromise long-term survival?

The methods of evaluating candidates for transplantation include careful history and physical examination; cardiopulmonary testing, including echocardiography, dobutamine stress testing, pulmonary function testing, and cardiac catheterization; measurement of creatinine clearance; abdominal imaging studies to evaluate portal vein patency and to detect hepatocellular carcinoma; and a thorough evaluation of social factors and support.2 Echocardiography is useful in assessing left ventricular function and detecting pulmonary hypertension, which is seen in as many as 5% of cirrhotic patients.3 Color flow Doppler studies of the portal vein are used to gauge the integrity of portal vein flow. If extensive portal vein thrombosis is detected, the transplant surgeon can obtain extra donor vessels to bypass the blockade if necessary. Computed tomographic angiography permits detection of small hepatocellular carcinomas and aberrant arterial blood supply to the liver. Rigorous evaluation of the patient for any addictive behavior and assessment of the patient's social support system allow the transplant team to plan in advance for any needed services, which may include counseling, specialized addiction treatment, housing, transportation, and financial assistance for medications and other expenses.

Contraindications to Transplantation

Patients with severe neurologic or cardiopulmonary disease cannot withstand the stress of transplantation surgery. Patients with cirrhosis who have severe pulmonary hypertension rarely survive the operation and perioperative period.4 Other contraindications to transplantation include severe or morbid obesity, extrahepatic malignancies, systemic infection, and cholangiocarcinoma.5 The most common surgical contraindication to liver transplantation is thrombosis of the portal vein and other splanchnic veins to such an extent that viable portal blood flow cannot be achieved.6 Finally, the most frequent contraindications to liver transplantation are ongoing destructive behavior resulting from drug or alcohol addiction and the inability of the patient to comply with the complex medical regimen required after the operation.

Timing of Transplantation

Determining the optimal time to refer patients for evaluation and to perform the operation can be as important to the outcome as patient selection. A few simple clinical approaches have proved useful in determining the prognosis of patients with liver disease. These include use of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification [see Table 2]; use of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for predicting survival in patients with liver disease; determination of the degree of ascites; and identification of other complications of cirrhosis.7,8

MELD, which employs a scoring system based on the serum bilirubin level, the serum creatinine level, and the international normalized ratio (INR) for prothrombin time, is now used for the allocation of donor organs in patients on liver transplantation waiting lists in the United States.9,10 MELD scores range from 6 to 40, with higher scores representing sicker patients, who are granted earlier access to donor organs.11 The United Network for Organ Sharing provides on their Web site a resource for calculating MELD scores for individual patients.12The MELD score can accurately predict 3-month mortality of patients with chronic liver disease who are on the liver waiting list [see Figure 1].11 The MELD score also is an accurate predictor of survival after liver transplantation.13 By comparing pretransplantation and posttransplantation outcomes, it has been shown that for patients who undergo liver transplantation for chronic liver failure, survival is improved only in those with MELD scores greater than 15 at the time of the operation.14

Table 1 Common Indications for Liver Transplantation

Chronic hepatitis

  Hepatitis C

  Hepatitis B

  Autoimmune hepatitis

Cholestatic liver disease

  Biliary atresia (in children)

  Primary biliary cirrhosis

  Sclerosing cholangitis

Metabolic diseases

  Wilson disease

  α1-Antitrypsin deficiency



  Primary hepatocellular carcinoma


Alcoholic liver disease

Cryptogenic cirrhosis

Miscellaneous conditions

  Hepatic veno-occlusive disease

  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis


  Crigler-Najjar syndrome

Fulminant hepatic failure

  Hepatitis B

  Hepatitis A

  Acetaminophen overdose

  Other drug-induced hepatitis

  Toxin-induced hepatitis

  Other viral hepatitides

Table 2 Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Classification*






Encephalopathy (grade)








Bilirubin (mg/dl)



> 3

Albumin (g/dl)

> 3.5


< 2.8

Prothrombin time (seconds prolonged)



> 6

*Minimum CTP score, 5 points; maximum CTP score, 15 points. CTP class A: 5 to 6 points. CTP class B: 7 to 9 points. CTP class C: 10 to 15 points.

The MELD score, CTP classification, and assessment of the complications of cirrhosis are the most useful tools for determining the optimal referral of patients to transplant centers.8 It is recommended that patients who show evidence of hepatic dysfunction (i.e., a MELD score of 10 or higher and a CTP score of 7 or higher) or who experience their first major complication (e.g., ascites or hepatic encephelopathy) should be referred to centers for potential transplantation.2 Development of other, more ominous complications of cirrhosis (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome) indicate the need for immediate referral of patients to a transplant center.

Operative Procedures

Most liver transplantations are performed using a whole cadaveric liver placed in the orthotopic position. To increase the overall organ supply and especially to aid young children, for whom there is a perennial shortage of donor organs, a cadaveric liver can be divided into parts for more than one recipient [see Figure 2]. The same techniques can be used with living donors, with only part of the liver being removed for transplantation. Living related donor transplantation for children is a well-established procedure.15 Living related donor transplantation for adults is also being performed at many transplantation centers, although donor safety remains a major concern.16,17

Liver transplantation is a complex, time-consuming operation that requires vascular reconstruction of the hepatic venous drainage to the inferior vena cava, to the hepatic artery, and to the portal vein. The hepatic vein of the donor organ is anastomosed to the inferior vena cava of the recipient; the donor hepatic artery is anastomosed to the recipient hepatic artery; and the portal vein is reconstructed by a vein graft or patch. Biliary reconstruction is usually accomplished by use of an end-to-end anastomosis of the proximal donor bile duct attached to the distal recipient duct; however, in recipients with diseased ducts, the donor duct is usually anastomosed to the jejunum by way of a Roux-en-Y loop.

A number of complications can be anticipated after liver transplantation, including perioperative and surgical complications, immunologic and infectious disorders, and a variety of medical complications.

Complications of Transplantation

Perioperative and Surgical Complications

The most serious immediate complication seen after liver transplantation is nonfunction of the transplanted liver, which occurs in 5% to 10% of cases. In these cases, patients fail to recover neurologic function; coagulopathy fails to improve spontaneously; and there is progressive jaundice and acidosis. Emergent retransplantation is the only recourse for these patients.

Other important surgical complications encountered after liver transplantation include hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and biliary tract complications (e.g., bile leaks and obstruction). Biliary tract complications are the most common; fortunately, most can be managed effectively with endoscopic techniques.18 Hepatic artery thrombosis is a much more serious complication that can result in the need for retransplantation. A variety of surgical and nonsurgical factors are associated with an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis. Included among the nonsurgical factors are immunologic status, hypercoagulable states, tobacco use, and cytomegalovirus infection.19

Immunologic Complications (Graft Rejection)

Two types of allograft rejection are seen after liver transplantation: cellular and ductopenic. Cellular rejection, which is usually manifested by elevated aminotransferase levels, is most commonly seen 6 to 10 weeks after transplantation. The diagnosis is confirmed by liver biopsy, which reveals cellular invasion of small bile ducts and vascular endothelium. Most patients respond rapidly to increased immunosuppression. Ductopenic rejection is a more indolent process that usually presents as progressive jaundice months to years after transplantation. Liver biopsies reveal gradual disappearance of intrahepatic bile ducts. Most patients with this condition ultimately require retransplantation.

Infectious Complications

Infections remain among the most serious complications encountered after liver transplantation. Many potential pathogens (e.g.,Pneumocystis jiroveci and cytomegalovirus) can usually be prevented with aggressive prophylaxis. In the early postoperative period, the most common pathogens are fungal and nosocomial bacterial infections. Candidiasis and aspergillosis, which remain the most serious infections encountered after liver transplantation, often occur in malnourished, critically ill patients.20 During the first few months after surgery, cytomegalovirus infection and recurrent hepatitis B and C virus infections become much more prominent. Infection with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium(VREF), is associated with increased postoperative mortality.21


Figure 1. Survival as a Function of MELD Score

Estimated 3-month survival as a function of the MELD score.11


Figure 2. Division of Liver for Transplantation

The liver can be divided into a number of sections, any combination of which can potentially be used for transplantation.

Complications of Immunosuppressive Therapy

A number of immunosuppressive agents are now available for use after solid-organ transplantation. These agents include cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and corticosteroids, as well as various polyclonal or monoclonal antilymphocyte preparations.22 Most liver transplant recipients receive either cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with one or more other immunosuppressive agents.

Complications from cyclosporine and tacrolimus

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are both associated with a number of complications, including renal dysfunction, neurologic toxicity, hypertension, pancreatic injury, and a variety of metabolic abnormalities. Renal failure occurs in 10% of patients who take cyclosporine or tacrolimus within 10 years after transplantation.23 Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 40 ml/min/kg body surface area 1 year after transplantation are at high risk for subsequent renal failure. Replacing calcineurin inhibitors with other immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, or both, may improve renal function in some patients, although monotherapy with either of these agents is associated with a slight increase in the risk of rejection.24 Some patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus experience severe neuropsychiatric complications, including psychosis, seizures, and apraxia.25 Many patients who take these drugs complain of headaches, tremors, and severe musculoskeletal pains. Hypertension, which is quite common in patients who take either cyclosporine or tacrolimus, is thought to result from peripheral and renal vasoconstriction.26 Pancreatic damage with development of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is more common after the use of tacrolimus. Patients who take either drug can experience hyperkalemia, hyperuricemia, and elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels.27 Switching patients from cyclosporine to tacrolimus appears to reduce the severity of hyerlipidemias in some patients.28,29 Treatment with low-dose cerivastatin or pravastatin also has been shown to significantly improve lipid profiles without adversely affecting liver function.30 Cyclosporine, but not tacrolimus, is associated with gingival hyperplasia and excessive hair growth, particularly on the arms and face.

Complications from azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus

Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil can cause bone marrow depression with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. A number of patients who take mycophenolate mofetil also experience gastrointestinal side effects, including nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Long-term corticosteroid therapy is associated with obesity, hypertension, glucose intolerance, cataracts, osteoporosis, and hypercholesterolemia. Side effects of sirolimus include gastrointestinal symptoms and marked elevations of serum lipids, particularly when sirolimus is used in combination with cyclosporine.31

Complications from drug-drug interactions

Both cyclosporine and tacrolimus are extensively metabolized in the liver, primarily via the cytochrome P-450 IIIA enzyme. As a result, both drugs are prone to numerous drug-drug interactions.22 The most dramatic examples include interactions with ketoconazole and phenytoin. Ketoconazole inhibits the P-450 IIIA enzyme and can result in marked increases in circulating levels of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. In contrast, phenytoin induces the enzyme, resulting in enhanced metabolism of cyclosporine and tacrolimus and difficulty maintaining adequate circulating levels of both drugs. A number of other commonly used drugs have lesser but important effects on cyclosporine and tacrolimus metabolism. Awareness of these interactions is important in managing patients after transplantation.


Figure 3. Evaluation of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes for Pancreas Transplantation

Algorithm for evaluation of patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus being considered for pancreas transplantation.

Delayed complications from immunosuppressive drugs

Most of the delayed complications seen after liver transplantation are secondary to the long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs. The most common of these complications include renal dysfunction, hypertension, diabetes, hyperkalemia and hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and malignancies.32 Hypertension can usually be effectively managed with a combination of calcium channel blockers and beta blockers.33 Transient hyperkalemia can be managed effectively with sodium polystyrene sulfonate. If hyperkalemia is sustained, fludrocortisone can be used. Although many patients experience hyperuricemia after liver transplantation, very few experience gout. Treatment of gout is difficult because allopurinol can interfere with azathioprine metabolism, which can result in profound, life-threatening leukopenia, and because nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs often worsen renal dysfunction. The necessity for treatment of hyperlipidemia after liver transplantation remains unclear. Obese patients who have undergone liver transplantation need a regular exercise program, limited caloric intake, and reduction or discontinuance of corticosteroids.34 After age-related cardiovascular complications, malignancies are the leading cause of late death in liver transplant recipients. The most common tumors seen in these patients are lymphoproliferative disorders associated with chronic viral infections and skin cancers (e.g., squamous cell carcinoma and Kaposi sarcoma).35 Many more recipients of liver transplantation are now receiving the bulk of their care from general internists, gastroenterologists, and primary care physicians. As a result, recognition of potential long-term complications and the need for appropriate immunizations and regular screening visits have become increasingly important.36

Disease-Specific Complications

Certain patients require specific management after liver transplantation because of potential disease-specific complications. For example, progressive liver disease can develop rapidly in patients with hepatitis B and can become fatal within a year after transplantation. However, if they are treated with aggressive antiviral therapy before and after transplantation, these patients have an excellent outcome, with minimal risk of severe recurrent disease.37 Most potential transplant candidates now receive antiviral therapy with lamivudine, adefovir, or entecavir before the operation to reduce levels of circulating virus. Some patients with decompensated cirrhosis have such a dramatic response that transplantation can be postponed indefinitely.38 After surgery, most patients now receive continuous treatment with hepatitis B immune globulin and antiviral agents to prevent recurrent disease.39 There is concern about the emergence of viral mutations after long-term therapy with any of the antiviral agents; however, patients who have strains resistant to one form of therapy have been successfully treated with other agents.40

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who undergo liver transplantation invariably have persistent infection after the operation. Long-term survival of these patients is significantly worse than for patients who receive transplantation for other conditions.41 The optimal management of these patients, which may include pretransplantation and posttransplantation antiviral therapy and retransplantation, remains unclear.42 Donor age, early graft dysfunction, and the type of immunosuppression have emerged as important factors influencing the severity of postoperative disease.43 Because chronic liver disease secondary to hepatitis C is the leading indication for liver transplantation, management of such cases is an issue of increasing importance.

Patients with genetic hemochromatosis also have a significantly worse outcome compared to patients who have undergone liver transplantation for other indications. This is particularly true for patients who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation or heterozygous for the C282Y and H63D mutations. Patients without genetic alterations who have hepatic iron overload at the time of transplantation also have poor outcomes.44

Patients with liver disease caused by sclerosing cholangitis often have associated inflammatory bowel disease. Although the transplant effectively addresses their liver disease, these patients remain at high risk for colon cancer. As a result, they require careful monitoring with colonoscopy and biopsies at least annually. If severe dysplasia is detected, these patients can be effectively treated with colectomy.

Liver transplantation has emerged as the optimal treatment for most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Excellent disease-free survival after transplantation is seen in patients who have (1) a single tumor no greater than 5 cm in diameter, or no more than three lesions, none of which are greater than 3 cm in diameter; (2) no radiographic evidence of vascular invasion; and (3) no evidence of metastases on head and chest CT scans and bone scans.45 The issue of long waiting periods before transplantation has been addressed in the new MELD system for allocation of donor organs, which gives patients with HCC who are optimal candidates for transplantation elevated scores to facilitate early transplantation.10

Outcomes after Transplantation

Survival after liver transplantation has improved steadily over the past 10 years. Most centers now report 1-year survival rates of 85% to 90% and 5-year survival rates of 75% to 80%.1,2 During the same interval, the costs have progressively decreased as the result of reduced hospitalization for most patients.46 The quality of life for most patients after successful transplantation is quite good. Most patients have been able to return to work, and physically active recipients have returned to vigorous endeavors, including marathon running and mountain climbing.

Pancreas Transplantation

Pancreas transplantation, which aims at providing physiologic insulin replacement, is a therapy that reliably achieves euglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Islet transplantation (engrafting only the insulin-producing B cells of the pancreas) is an exciting alternative that is still in its clinical infancy.47,48,49 Two major difficulties prevent this technique from becoming widespread: (1) more than one pancreas is required to provide the recipient with enough islet cells to become euglyce-mic; and (2) the meticulous technique used for obtaining islet cells for transplantation varies from center to center.50

Since the first vascularized pancreas transplantation in 1966, more than 23,000 have been performed worldwide.51,52 Approximately 78% of pancreas transplantations have been performed with simultaneous kidney transplantations from the same donors (i.e., simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK] transplantation), with the recipients being those in whom renal failure is imminent or those who are already on dialysis.52 Of the remaining transplantations, 16% have been performed as a pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation in diabetic patients who have had a previous kidney transplant, and 7% have been performed as a pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) in diabetic patients who have not yet experienced significant renal failure.52

The goals of pancreas transplantation are to improve the quality of life for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, reverse the metabolic abnormalities caused by the disease, and prevent the secondary complications of the disease. Despite these lofty goals, postoperative complications and the need for long-term immunosuppression have rendered pancreas transplantation controversial except in a select subpopulation of patients.

Candidates for Transplantation

During evaluation, it is essential to confirm the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus, to confirm that secondary complications of diabetes are present, to determine the candidate's ability to undergo a major operation, and to rule out any contraindications to the operation.53 The type of procedure to be performed is determined by the renal function status of the potential recipient [see Figure 3].


Figure 4. Enteric Drainage Technique

Enteric drainage technique for a whole pancreas graft that incorporates anastamosis of the intact duodenum to a roux-en-Y limb of recipient jejunum.69 (IVC—inferior vena cava)

Contraindications to Transplantation

Patients with insufficient cardiovascular reserve (e.g., those who recently had a myocardial infarction), patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50%, or patients with coronary angiographic evidence of significant uncorrectable coronary artery disease should not undergo pancreas transplantation53 [see Figure 3]. Unnecessary loss of pancreas grafts is avoided by excluding patients with current major psychiatric illness or evidence of significant noncompliance. In addition, transplantation should not be considered in patients with an active infection or malignancy.

Other contraindications are controversial and depend on the individual transplantation center. Extremity amputations necessitated by vascular disease usually indicate severe generalized vasculopathy and suggest a condition in which pancreas transplantation would not be beneficial. Patients whose weight is greater than 130% of their ideal body weight often have insulin resistance and, as a result, are not helped by transplantation.53 Continued cigarette use often indicates poor compliance in patients who have already been strongly encouraged to stop smoking. Severe neurogenic bladder dysfunction usually predicts a complicated postoperative course and is considered a contraindication at some centers.

Operative Procedures

Pancreas transplantation includes placement of the pancreas graft, usually in the right lower quadrant, with the reconstructed arteries of the pancreas anastomosed to the common iliac artery [see Figure 4].54 To provide drainage for pancreatic exocrine excretions, the increasingly favored procedure is to anastomose the duodenum of the graft to the recipient's small bowel as opposed to the mobilized urinary bladder.52,54,55 The venous drainage of the graft is achieved by anastomosing the portal vein either to the mobilized common iliac vein or to the portal vein.54,55 In SPK transplantation, the kidney is placed in the left lower quadrant.

Perioperative Care

In the immediate postoperative period, specific care should be directed toward monitoring cardiovascular function.54 Insulin infusions are generally given for a few days to rest the transplanted islets. Because many patients have some form of diabetic gastropathy, a nasogastric tube is required for 4 to 7 days postoperatively. A urinary catheter is required for an extended period to reduce the risk of complications from neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

Complications of Transplantation

Surgical Complications

Surgical complications of pancreas transplantation have recently been analyzed in a large, prospective, multicenter study.56 Complications can occur within the first 3 postoperative months; such complications include the necessity of reoperation, arterial and venous graft vessel thrombosis, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and enteric or ureteral leaks. The risk of these complications is increased when donors are older than 45 years of age.56

Immunologic Complications (Graft Rejection)

Rejection, which is the leading cause of graft loss after a successful pancreas transplantation, has decreased markedly in the past few years.52 The gold standard for diagnosis of rejection is histopathologic evaluation of the graft.57 Rejection can be confirmed histologically, because tissue samples of the graft can be obtained by percutaneous biopsies.57

Complications of Medical Therapy

With the increased use of enteric drainage rather than bladder drainage, the complications of dehydration and metabolic acidosis have decreased significantly.55

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid have become the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy for pancreas transplantation. In addition, most pancreas transplant centers now use induction immunosuppressive therapy followed by steroid-free maintenance therapy58; this preventive measure reduces the risk of medical complications caused by corticosteroid therapy.

Graft pancreatitis, which is also a common side effect, is manifested by hyperamylasemia, abdominal pain, and graft tenderness. This complication occurs less frequently than in the past because most pancreas transplants are now enterically drained.

Outcomes after Transplantation

Metabolic Outcomes

Successful pancreas transplantation results in normalization of glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels.53 Glucose tolerance tests are normal or near normal; however, insulin levels are much higher than normal in recipients of pancreas transplantation. The systemic venous drainage of the graft causes elevated plasma levels of insulin, which is known to be a potent regulator of plasma lipoprotein metabolism. As a result, SPK transplantation recipients have a more favorable lipid profile than patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who have kidney transplants.59

Effect on Disorders Associated with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetic nephropathy

A transplanted pancreas can prevent or reduce the nephropathy that eventually develops in diabetic patients with a kidney graft. The presence of a transplanted pancreas can also reduce the risk of diabetic nephropathy in the kidneys of SPK transplant recipients.60 The successful pancreas transplant alone can improve diabetic nephropathy, as evidenced by reduced proteinuria and unchanged creatinine levels and clearance rates at 1 year posttransplantation.61


Pancreas transplantation appears to have a stabilizing effect on retinopathy. In a recent study, pancreas transplantation was associated with improvement or stabilization of diabetic retinopathy in more than 90% of patients. Even in patients whose retinopathy was more advanced before they underwent surgery, the majority experienced no further progression after the transplantation.62


Reestablishment of the euglycemic state by successful pancreas transplantation halts or reverses diabetic neuropathy. In one study, motor nerve conduction increased in patients whose transplantations were successful.63 Changes in autonomic function were favorable, but they did not amount to significant improvement at long-term follow-up.63


Pancreas transplantation has at least a partial beneficial effect on the macroangiopathy of the carotid artery in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.64 Also, compared with type 1 diabetes mellitus patients who receive kidney transplants, SPK recipients show improvement of diabetic microangiopathy.62,65 The progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with functioning pancreas grafts is reduced.

Survival Outcomes

Patient survival exceeds 96% at 1 year and 90% at 3 years. Graft survival (i.e., complete insulin independence) exceeds 85% at 1 year and 75% at 3 years.46 Patients who undergo SPK transplantation have a markedly improved 10-year survival, compared with diabetic patients who undergo kidney transplantation alone.52,66,67

Quality of Life

Quality of life in terms of general health perception, physical ability, and sexual activity is higher for SPK transplant recipients than for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who receive kidney transplants, and it is far higher for SPK transplant recipients than for patients who remain on hemodialysis.68


Figure 2 Tom Moore.

Figure 4 Alice Y. Chen


  1. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, accessed August, 2006,
  2. Murray KF, Carithers RL Jr: AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology 41:1407,2005
  3. Colle IO, Moreau R, Godinho E, et al: Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in candidates for liver transplantation: a prospective study. Hepatology 37:401,2003
  4. Krowka MJ, Plevak DJ, Findlay JY, et al: Pulmonary hemodynamics and perioperative cardiopulmonary-related mortality in patients with portopulmonary hypertension undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 6:443,2000
  5. Nair S, Verma S, Thuluvath PJ: Obesity and its effect on survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation in the United States. Hepatology 35:105,2002
  6. Manzanet G, Sanjuan F, Orbis P, et al: Liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis. Liver Transpl 7:125,2001
  7. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al: A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31:864,2000
  8. Lucey MR, Brown KA, Everson GT, et al: Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: a report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver Transpl Surg 3:628,1997
  9. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al: A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33:464,2001
  10. Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, et al: MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl 7:567,2001
  11. Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 124:91,2003
  12. Merion RM: When is a patient too well and when is a patient too sick for a liver transplant? Liver Transpl 10(suppl 2):S69,2004
  13. Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, et al: The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 5:307,2005
  14. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS): Resources: MELD/PELD calculator.
  15. Otte JB, Ville-de-Goyet J, Reding R, et al: Pediatric liver transplantation: from the full-size liver graft to reduced, split, and living related liver transplantation. Pediatr Surg Int 13:308,1998
  16. Trotter JF, Wachs M, Everson GT, et al: Adult-to-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. N Engl J Med 346:1074,2002
  17. Surman OS: The ethics of partial-liver donation. N Engl J Med 346:1038,2002
  18. Moser MA, Wall WJ: Management of biliary problems after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S46,2001
  19. Pastacaldi S, Teixeira R, Montalto P, et al: Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of nonsurgical causes. Liver Transpl 7:75,2001
  20. Rabkin JM, Oroloff SL, Corless CL, et al: Association of fungal infection and increased mortality in liver transplant recipients. Am J Surg 179:426,2000
  21. Singh N, Gayowski T, Rihs JD, et al: Evolving trends in multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacteria in liver transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Liver Transpl 7:22,2001
  22. Levy GA: Long-term immunosuppression and drug interactions. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S53,2001
  23. Cohen AJ, Stegall MD, Rosen CB, et al: Chronic renal dysfunction late after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 8:916,2002
  24. Schlitt HJ, Barkmann A, Boker KH, et al: Replacement of calcineurin inhibitors with mycophenolate mofetil in liver-transplant recipients with renal dysfunction: a randomized controlled study. Lancet 357:587,2001
  25. Beresford TP: Neuropsychiatric complications of liver and other solid organ transplantation. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S36,2001
  26. Textor SC, Taler SJ, Canzanello VJ: Posttransplantation hypertension related to calcineurin inhibitors. Liver Transpl 6:521,2000
  27. Charco R, Cantarell C, Vargas V, et al: Serum cholesterol changes in long-term survivors of liver transplantation: a comparison between cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy. Liver Transpl Surg 5:204,1999
  28. Manzarbeitia C, Reich DJ, Rothstein KD, et al: Tacrolimus conversion improves hyperlipidemic states in stable liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 7:93,2001
  29. Neal DA, Gimson AE, Gibbs P, et al: Beneficial effects of converting liver transplant recipients from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on blood pressure, serum lipids, and weight. Liver Transpl 7:533,2001
  30. Zachoval R, Gerbes AL, Schwandt P, et al: Short-term effects of statin therapy in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia after liver transplantation: results of a randomized cross-over trial. J Hepatol 35:86,2001
  31. Trotter JF, Wachs ME, Trouillot TE, et al: Dyslipidemia during sirolimus therapy in liver transplant recipients occurs with concomitant cyclosporine but not tacrolimus. Liver Transpl 7:401,2001
  32. Sheiner PA, Magliocca JF, Bodian CA, et al: Long-term medical complications in patients surviving > or = 5 years after liver transplant. Transplantation 69:781,2000
  33. Gonwa TA: Hypertension and renal dysfunction in long-term liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S26,2001
  34. Reubin A: Long-term management of the liver transplant patient: diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and obesity. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S13,2001
  35. Fung JJ, Jain A, Kwak EJ, et al: De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: a major late cause of late death. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S109,2001
  36. McCashland TM: Posttransplantation care: role of the primary care physician versus transplant center. Liver Transpl 7(suppl 1):S2,2001
  37. Steinmuller T, Seehofer D, Rayes N, et al: Increasing applicability of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease. Hepatology 35:1528,2002
  38. Fontana RJ, Hann HW, Perrillo RP, et al: Determinants of early mortality in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B treated with antiviral therapy. Gastroenterology 123:719,2002
  39. Multimer D: Review article: hepatitis B and liver transplantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1031,2006
  40. Schreibman IR, Schiff ER: Prevention and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation: the current role of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5:8,2006
  41. Forman LM, Lewis JD, Berlin JA, et al: The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 122:889,2002
  42. Davis GL: The challenge of progressive hepatitis C following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 12:19,2006
  43. Lake JR, Shorr JS, Steffen BJ, et al: Differential effects of donor age in liver transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B, hepatitis C and without viral hepatitis. Am J Transplant 5:549,2005
  44. Kowley KV, Brandhagen DJ, Gish RG, et al: Survival after liver transplantation in patients with iron overload: the national hemochromatosis transplant registry. Gastroenterology 129:494,2005
  45. Bruix J, Llovet JM: Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:519,2002
  46. Best JH, Veenstra DL, Geppert J: Trends in expenditures for Medicare liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 7:858,2001
  47. Worldwide Transplant Center Directory: Islet transplants. Clin Transpl, 2001, p 383
  48. Ryan EA, Lakey JR, Paty BW, et al: Successful islet transplantation: continued insulin reserve provides long-term glycemic control. Diabetes 51:2148,2002
  49. Robertson RP: Islet transplantation as a treatment for diabetes: a work in progress. N Engl J Med 350:694,2004
  50. Hakim NS: Recent developments and future prospects in pancreatic transplantation. Exp Clin Transplant 1:26,2003
  51. Kelly WD, Lillehei RC, Merkel FK, et al: Allotransplantation of the pancreas and duodenum along with the kidney in diabetic nephropathy. Surgery 61:827,1967
  52. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE: Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004. Clin Transplant 19:433,2005
  53. Robertson RP, Sutherland DE, Lanz KJ: Normoglycemia and preserved insulin secretory reserve in diabetic patients 10–18 years after pancreas transplantation. Diabetes 48:1737,1999
  54. Perkins JD, Fromme GA, Narr BJ, et al: Pancreas transplantation at Mayo: II. Operative and perioperative management. Mayo Clin Proc 65:483,1990
  55. Stratta RJ, Gaber AO, Shokouh-Amiri MH, et al: A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation. Surgery 127:217,2000
  56. Malaise J, Steurer W, Koenigsrainer A, et al: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in a large multicenter study: surgical complications. Transplant Proc 37:2859,2005
  57. Laftavi MR, Gruessner AC, Bland BJ, et al: Significance of pancreas graft biopsy in detection of rejection. Transplant Proc 30:642,1998
  58. Kaufman DB, Leventhal JR, Gallon LG: Alemtuzumab induction and prednisone-free maintenance immunotherapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation comparison with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction: long-term results. Am J Transplant 6:331,2006
  59. Foger B, Konigsrainer A, Palos G, et al: Effect of pancreas transplantation on lipoprotein lipase, postprandial lipemia, and HDL cholesterol. Transplantation 58:899,1994
  60. Wilczek HE, Jaremko G, Tyden G, et al: Evolution of diabetic nephropathy in kidney grafts. Transplantation 59:51,1995
  61. Coppelli A, Giannarelli R, Vistoli F, et al: The beneficial effects of pancreas transplant alone on diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 28:1366,2005
  62. Giannarelli R, Coppelli A, Sartini M, et al: Effects of pancreas-kidney transplantation on diabetic retinopathy. Transpl Int 18:619,2005
  63. Navarro X, Sutherland DE, Kennedy WR: Long-term effects of pancreatic transplantation on diabetic neuropathy. Ann Neurol 42:727,1997
  64. Larsen JL, Ratanasuwan T, Burkman T, et al: Carotid intima media thickness decreases after pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 73:936,2002
  65. Jukema JW, Smets YF, van der Pijl JW, et al: Impact of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal failure due to type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:906,2002
  66. Tyden G, Tollemar J, Bolinder J: Combined pancreas and kidney transplantation improves survival in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Clin Transplant 14:505,2000
  67. Reddy KS, Stablein D, Taranto S, et al: Long-term survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation versus kidney transplantation alone in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 41:464,2003
  68. Gross CR, Limwattananon C, Matthees B, et al: Impact of transplantation on quality of life in patients with diabetes and renal dysfunction. Transplantation 70:1736,2000
  69. Prieto M, Sutherland DE, Goetz FC, et al: Pancreas transplant results according to the technique of duct management: bladder versus enteric drainage. Surgery 102:680,987

Editors: Dale, David C.; Federman, Daniel D.